On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 14:38:44 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes:
Is there some way to get a `Virtual' resolution using whatever
techniques are now employed to generate our desktops?
Yes, I would try to set it with xrandr:
On Sat 01 Oct 2011 at 13:46:37 +, Camaleón wrote:
It should be enough with a simple:
xrandr --output DVI-I-1 --panning 2048 1536
But I can confirm that this is not working while it was months ago so
unless xrandr now needs puting things in a different way I dunno what's
going
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:56:31 +0100, Brian wrote:
On Sat 01 Oct 2011 at 13:46:37 +, Camaleón wrote:
It should be enough with a simple:
xrandr --output DVI-I-1 --panning 2048 1536
But I can confirm that this is not working while it was months ago so
unless xrandr now needs puting
Scott Ferguson prettyfly.producti...@gmail.com writes:
Is there some way to get a `Virtual' resolution using whatever
techniques are now employed to generate our desktops?
Yes
xrandr --panning
*Just an example - DO NOT use on your monitor/screen* eg:-
xrandr --output LVDS --panning
On Fri 30 Sep 2011 at 07:52:23 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
Scott Ferguson prettyfly.producti...@gmail.com writes:
*Just an example - DO NOT use on your monitor/screen* eg:-
xrandr --output LVDS --panning 2048x1536
Whats with the Do NOT part? Harmful in some way?
Scott is possibly
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 19:55:13 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
(...)
With that in xorg.conf... I'd have a desktop of that size but when I
try to use the xorg.conf on this brand new install of debian wheezy it
just gums up the works... and can't get to X at all.
Is there some way to get a
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes:
Is there some way to get a `Virtual' resolution using whatever
techniques are now employed to generate our desktops?
Yes, I would try to set it with xrandr:
http://wiki.debian.org/XStrikeForce/HowToRandR12
some (alot) of that is pretty confusing to me.
On Fri 30 Sep 2011 at 14:38:44 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
I'm not getting heads or tails from the web page... can you take an
educated guess what might work to give me a fair bit of panning room?
Could be a bug, y'know. It's been known to happen:
On 01/10/11 05:38, Harry Putnam wrote:
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes:
Is there some way to get a `Virtual' resolution using whatever
techniques are now employed to generate our desktops?
Yes, I would try to set it with xrandr:
http://wiki.debian.org/XStrikeForce/HowToRandR12
some
For many years I've been able to get a really big desktop, so big you
have to pan around on it. I used some code in xorg.conf to do it, but
now that X and desktops are generated quite a lot different. I don't
begin to understand the process but would like to find a way to get my
old high
On 30/09/11 10:55, Harry Putnam wrote:
For many years I've been able to get a really big desktop, so big you
have to pan around on it. I used some code in xorg.conf to do it, but
now that X and desktops are generated quite a lot different. I don't
begin to understand the process but would
11 matches
Mail list logo