Hi Andy,
[]
>> My understanding is that as we are sending email from our own domain
>> e.g "example.com" its complaining because the PTR is ovh.net not example.com?
> No, there is no requirement for the PTR record to match the From:
> address of the email. They just want it to not look
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 02, 2023 at 12:46:04PM +0100, Andrew Wood wrote:
> Can I clarify my understanding of an issue with a Debian Postfix server
> please. We have a mail server which is a VPS running Debian hosted by OVH.
> Its hostname is of the form vps-xyz.vps.ovh.net the PTR for the IP
On 02/06/2023 13:01, Dan Ritter wrote:
Ask OVH to set the PTR to one of your domains, and make sure you
have an MX in each of your domains that points back to that
domain.
i.e.:
PTR mail.longterm.com
MX for longterm:
50 mail.longterm.com
MX for otherdomain:
30 mail.otherdomain.com
50
Andrew Wood wrote:
> Hi
>
> Can I clarify my understanding of an issue with a Debian Postfix server
> please. We have a mail server which is a VPS running Debian hosted by OVH.
> Its hostname is of the form vps-xyz.vps.ovh.net the PTR for the IP resolves
> to that.
>
&
Le 2 juin 2023 Andrew Wood a écrit :
> The the issue is our server sends mail for our own domains and we are getting
> mail rejected from some recipient servers with 550 PTR rejected: Please use a
> non-generic PTR (in reply to RCPT TO command.
Give the full message for better understanding but
Hi
Can I clarify my understanding of an issue with a Debian Postfix server
please. We have a mail server which is a VPS running Debian hosted by
OVH. Its hostname is of the form vps-xyz.vps.ovh.net the PTR for the IP
resolves to that.
The the issue is our server sends mail for our own
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 5:09 AM Tom Browder wrote:
>
> I am preparing servers to use with OpenSMTPD and Sympa to provide mail
and mailing list service.
...
After considering all the suggestions, I have prepared a plan, using a bit
of pseudo code, to describe what I believe I need to do.
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 11:04 AM Henning Follmann
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 08:47:36AM -0600, Tom Browder wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 08:37 Henning Follmann
...
> For years I operated a couple of sendmail installations. That and the
> O'Reilly Sendmail book tought me a lot.
> Today
On Fri 21 Feb 2020 at 12:36:38 -0600, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 12:05 PM Brian wrote:
> > On Fri 21 Feb 2020 at 11:22:58 -0600, Tom Browder wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 09:36 Brian wrote:
> ...
> > Thanks, I will read the page in detail later. Meanwhile, I did a
ot; (such as
│ or ). It should be a fully qualified domain
name (FQDN) that you are entitled to use.
│
│ For instance, to allow the local host to generate mail with
addresses such as , set the
│ system mail name to "example.org".
So, I guess I can trust opensmtpd to do the right thing if I set up
it
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 12:05 PM Brian wrote:
> On Fri 21 Feb 2020 at 11:22:58 -0600, Tom Browder wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 09:36 Brian wrote:
...
> Thanks, I will read the page in detail later. Meanwhile, I did a quick
> search on the page for "mailname" and didn't get anything.
ware of the function
> > of /etc/mailname in its sending of mail. What does /etc/mailname do on
> > OpenSMTPD?
>
>
> The source of my info is in this link:
>
>
> https://poolp.org/posts/2019-09-14/setting-up-a-mail-server-with-opensmtpd-dovecot-and-rspamd/?utm_source=s
this link:
https://poolp.org/posts/2019-09-14/setting-up-a-mail-server-with-opensmtpd-dovecot-and-rspamd/?utm_source=share_medium=ios_app_name=iossmf
-Tom
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 08:47:36AM -0600, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 08:37 Henning Follmann
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 12:38:45PM +0100, john doe wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > Don't do THAT!
> >
> > RFC2181 section 10.3 says you can't point your MX record to a CNAME
> >
>
On Fri 21 Feb 2020 at 05:09:47 -0600, Tom Browder wrote:
> I am preparing servers to use with OpenSMTPD and Sympa to provide mail and
> mailing list service.
>
> I need to settle on names to define as the "mailname" for each the two
> servers I will designate for the DNS MX records for all my
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 08:37 Henning Follmann
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 12:38:45PM +0100, john doe wrote:
...
> Don't do THAT!
>
> RFC2181 section 10.3 says you can't point your MX record to a CNAME
>
Maybe that's why Namecheap has the MXE record that points to an IP.
Besides the
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 12:38:45PM +0100, john doe wrote:
> On 2/21/2020 12:09 PM, Tom Browder wrote:
> > I am preparing servers to use with OpenSMTPD and Sympa to provide mail and
> > mailing list service.
> >
> > I need to settle on names to define as the "mailname" for each the two
> > servers
On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:46:59 -0600
Tom Browder wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 06:29 Joe wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:00:14 -0600
> > Tom Browder wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > As I understand it, a mail server has to use smtp to physically
> &
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 06:29 Joe wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:00:14 -0600
> Tom Browder wrote:
...
> > As I understand it, a mail server has to use smtp to physically
> > transfer mail between physical hosts and that requires one name that
> > will resolve to a
gt; Depends on the purpose of the name(s).
>
> ...
>
> Thanks, Jonas, that makes good sense. Based on that I should use
> "mail" and maybe "mail2" for my backup mail server.
Only if by "backup" you mean mirror of mail services generally - i.e.
also fo
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 06:17 Michael Howard
wrote:
...
> I don't know your use case but using 'regular' names like smtp.example.com,
> imap.example.com, pop3.example.com etc, help with the auto config
> processes used on devices, thus making it easier for users to setup
> accounts on their
ase) multiple
> domains hosted across multiple servers which I also fully control (no
> sharing, full root control).
>
> As I understand it, a mail server has to use smtp to physically
> transfer mail between physical hosts and that requires one name that
> will resolve to an IP.
uld use "mail" and
maybe "mail2" for my backup mail server.
One of the reasons I asked was I know Gmail used to use something like "
smtp.gmail.com" for its smtp server and thought that might be popular among
sysadmins with such servers.
-Tom
On 21/02/2020 11:09, Tom Browder wrote:
I am preparing servers to use with OpenSMTPD and Sympa to provide mail
and mailing list service.
I need to settle on names to define as the "mailname" for each the two
servers I will designate for the DNS MX records for all my
mail-enabled domains. The
or any other
> choice?
Depends on the purpose of the name(s).
If you run everything on a single host, then mail.example.com.
If you need to distinguish mail routing from other tasks (e.g. when
running a spam filter on a different host and you want to tell other
smtp servers to
l
root control).
As I understand it, a mail server has to use smtp to physically transfer
mail between physical hosts and that requires one name that will resolve to
an IP. Even if the server is hosting multiple domains, the mail for each
still has to use the one "mailname" for transport.
H
On 2/21/2020 12:09 PM, Tom Browder wrote:
> I am preparing servers to use with OpenSMTPD and Sympa to provide mail and
> mailing list service.
>
> I need to settle on names to define as the "mailname" for each the two
> servers I will designate for the DNS MX records for all my mail-enabled
>
I am preparing servers to use with OpenSMTPD and Sympa to provide mail and
mailing list service.
I need to settle on names to define as the "mailname" for each the two
servers I will designate for the DNS MX records for all my mail-enabled
domains. The mailnames should be "fully qualified domain
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
The script needs more work it is not exim4-exploiters, it is for
repeated failed logins.
As it is now, it will treat any single failure as one to ban and that
is only going to cause trouble. Although users should be logged in
normally and will
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Slightly improved shell script, uses iprange once and conflates both
lists together.
#!/bin/bash
declare -a tcp25_set tcp465_set tcp_25_465_set
banned_ports_list=25,465,993,995
logwatch_file=/var/log/exim4/logwatch-email-20190622a.eml
# NB
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 22/6/19 6:24 pm, john doe wrote:
>> I've blacklisted quite a number of IP addresses and CIDR blocks
>> from delivering email to my server with entries in the
>> /etc/exim4/local_host_blacklist file.
>>
>> Is there any config file that I
> Hi,
>
> I've blacklisted quite a number of IP addresses and CIDR blocks from
> delivering email to my server with entries in the
> /etc/exim4/local_host_blacklist file.
>
> Is there any config file that I can easily use to block 465 login
> attempts from bad IP addresses and CIDR blocks?
>
> If
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I've blacklisted quite a number of IP addresses and CIDR blocks from
delivering email to my server with entries in the
/etc/exim4/local_host_blacklist file.
Is there any config file that I can easily use to block 465 login
attempts from bad IP
of its
>>>> recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
>>>>
>>>>debian-user@lists.debian.org
>>>> SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT
>>>> TO:<debian-user@lists.debian.org>:
>>>>
ddress(es) failed:
>>>
>>>debian-user@lists.debian.org
>>> SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT
>>> TO:<debian-user@lists.debian.org>:
>>> host bendel.debian.org [82.195.75.100]: 554 5.1.8
>>> <gldu-debian-use...@m.gmane
On 2018-02-18, Karol Augustin <ka...@augustin.pl> wrote:
>>
>> A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
>> recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
>>
>>debian-user@lists.debian.org
>>
his is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
>
>debian-user@lists.debian.org
> SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT
> TO:<debian-user@lists.debian.org>:
> host bendel.debian.org [82.195.75.100]: 554 5.1.8
> <gldu-debian-use...@m.gmane
-user@lists.debian.org
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT
TO:<debian-user@lists.debian.org>:
host bendel.debian.org [82.195.75.100]: 554 5.1.8
<gldu-debian-use...@m.gmane.org>:
Sender address rejected: Domain not found
Domain not found. This is quite sudde
My mail was duplicated 4 times due to random timings of mail.
Sometimes they would go right away, some would lag for 60 min!
Sorry for the duplicates.
_
Free e-mail, simple, clean and easy to use. Visit CosmicEmail.com for your
instant
Merhaba arkadaşlar. Bir acentenin mail server işi için teklif vermem lazım.
2 milyon email adresi var.
Spama takılmadan mail gönderebilrmesi için nasıl bir sistem kurmalıyım .
Yardımlarınız için şimdiden teşekkürler.
of
emails on our mail server and in case of email lost we can not recover
it since we have no backup. so my proposal to my management is if we
place a centralized mail server we can make backup of users email from
our mail server and old mail can also be restored. you can call it
migrating
to migrate the e-mails and
other stuff from Outlook clients to the new e-mailing service?
ok our 20 users fetching their emails from our hosted server. which is
maintained by our service provider. and we are keeping 3 months of
emails on our mail server and in case of email lost we can
mail server unintentionally mailer daemon
comes in my mind. this is my first time that i am implementing MTA on
linux.since i have just started to shift from Microsoft to Linux.
there is lot to learn.
I first switched -time ago- from MDaemon (v3.2) when I installed a
Linux system and had
years working with Mailer daemon v7.0 so when
ever some one say a name mail server unintentionally mailer daemon
comes in my mind. this is my first time that i am implementing MTA on
linux.since i have just started to shift from Microsoft to Linux.
there is lot to learn.
I first switched -time ago
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 20:21:53 +0500
Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote:
ok our 20 users fetching their emails from our hosted server. which is
maintained by our service provider. and we are keeping 3 months of
emails on our mail server and in case of email lost we can not recover
there are few populer mail servers like
postfix, sandmail etc out there.
here is some details about my office.
1. 20 users.
2. pop from main server
3. send via SMTP
4. local mail distribution IMAP
i am not looking in to easy or hard mail server. what i am looking is
it should
On Sb, 28 iul 12, 12:53:19, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
is there any good howto on Debian Squeeze on following tools
-postfidx
-dovecot
-postfixadmin (web interface)
-roundcube
-spamassassin
-clamv
btw i have a question in my mind . postfix is mail server. but the
question raising
Muhammad Yousuf Khan:
btw i have a question in my mind . postfix is mail server. but the
question raising in my mind if postfix is the complete server then why
we have to add several other tools like mentioned above
(dovecot,spamassassin etc) ?
When Unix/Linux people talk about mail servers
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote:
-postfidx
-dovecot
-postfixadmin (web interface)
-roundcube
-spamassassin
-clamv
btw i have a question in my mind . postfix is mail server. but the
question raising in my mind if postfix is the complete server
actually i have spent 3 years working with Mailer daemon v7.0 so when
ever some one say a name mail server unintentionally mailer daemon
comes in my mind. this is my first time that i am implementing MTA on
linux.since i have just started to shift from Microsoft to Linux.
there is lot to learn
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Brad Alexander stor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com
wrote:
-postfidx
-dovecot
-postfixadmin (web interface)
-roundcube
-spamassassin
-clamv
btw i have a question in my mind . postfix is mail
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks, good example. if i say ISPs which provide SMTP relay. are
using MTA where they dont want to store emails (unlike i have to do in
office) rather just relay all the messages to destination. Correct?
Generally
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 18:01:09 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
actually i have spent 3 years working with Mailer daemon v7.0 so when
ever some one say a name mail server unintentionally mailer daemon
comes in my mind. this is my first time that i am implementing MTA on
linux.since i have
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 18:01:09 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
actually i have spent 3 years working with Mailer daemon v7.0 so when
ever some one say a name mail server unintentionally mailer daemon
comes in my mind
is there any good howto on Debian Squeeze on following tools
-postfidx
-dovecot
-postfixadmin (web interface)
-roundcube
-spamassassin
-clamv
Most of that list is covered by the tutorials at
http://workaround.org/ispmail/
I have used the tutorial for Debian Lenny and found it very
[Please trim your posts.]
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 12:53:19PM +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
is there any good howto on Debian Squeeze on following tools
Google is your friend. It also corrects spelling mistakes. :)
-postfidx
Web Results 1 - 10 of about 276,000 for +squeeze +postfidx
there.
here is some details about my office.
1. 20 users.
2. pop from main server
3. send via SMTP
4. local mail distribution IMAP
i am not looking in to easy or hard mail server. what i am looking is
it should be good for my carrier and for my office too.
secure, stable, web base
On 25.07.2012 22:14, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
Thanks for letting me know these matters but i am not using it
publicly i will be downloading my emails from my hosted mail server.
Then you will have to add a tool like fetchmail to your list to
download the mails and put them into the local
On 25.07.2012 22:17, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
how you perform basic tasks like mail-ques checking, logs, mail box
create, delete, mail restriction .etc.?
With postfix there is the command postqueue which will show you the
current queue. With the postsuper command you can delete Mails
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 01:17:15 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 16:52:25 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
need suggestions, i know there are few populer mail servers like
postfix, sandmail etc out
On 26.07.2012 16:25, Camaleón wrote:
how you perform basic tasks like mail-ques checking, logs, mail box
create, delete, mail restriction .etc.?
IIRC, last time I checked years ago, there were some GUI based frontends
to perform the usual operations with Cyrus and Postfix (and also
On Jo, 26 iul 12, 10:17:38, Denis Witt wrote:
On 25.07.2012 22:14, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
Thanks for letting me know these matters but i am not using it
publicly i will be downloading my emails from my hosted mail server.
Then you will have to add a tool like fetchmail to your list
need suggestions, i know there are few populer mail servers like
postfix, sandmail etc out there.
here is some details about my office.
1. 20 users.
2. pop from main server
3. send via SMTP
4. local mail distribution IMAP
i am not looking in to easy or hard mail server. what i am looking
in to easy or hard mail server. what i am looking is
it should be good for my carrier and for my office too.
secure, stable, web base console etc.
btw, i have heard that there is a mailserver called zimbra. but i
think debian is not natively supporting it.
any help would be appreciable
from main server
3. send via SMTP
4. local mail distribution IMAP
i am not looking in to easy or hard mail server. what i am looking is
it should be good for my carrier and for my office too.
secure, stable, web base console etc.
btw, i have heard that there is a mailserver called
am not looking in to easy or hard mail server. what i am looking is
it should be good for my carrier and for my office too.
secure, stable, web base console etc.
btw, i have heard that there is a mailserver called zimbra. but i
think debian is not natively supporting it.
any help would
On 25.07.2012 13:52, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
here is some details about my office.
1. 20 users.
2. pop from main server
3. send via SMTP
4. local mail distribution IMAP
i am not looking in to easy or hard mail server. what i am looking is
it should be good for my carrier and for my
i am not looking in to easy or hard mail server. what i am looking is it
should be good for my carrier and for my office too. secure, stable,
web base console etc.
btw, i have heard that there is a mailserver called zimbra. but i think
debian is not natively supporting it.
Ugh... I would
server
3. send via SMTP
4. local mail distribution IMAP
i am not looking in to easy or hard mail server. what i am looking is
it should be good for my carrier and for my office too.
secure, stable, web base console etc.
btw, i have heard that there is a mailserver called zimbra. but i
think
in to easy or hard mail server. what i am looking is
it should be good for my carrier and for my office too.
secure, stable, web base console etc.
btw, i have heard that there is a mailserver called zimbra. but i
think debian is not natively supporting it.
Hi,
you will need at least two things
from main server
3. send via SMTP
4. local mail distribution IMAP
i am not looking in to easy or hard mail server. what i am looking is it
should be good for my carrier and for my office too. secure, stable,
web base console etc.
btw, i have heard that there is a mailserver called zimbra
, mydomain.example has to be routeable and
accesible worldwide otherwise nobody would be able to exchange messages
with your host but from your own local network.
and forward to another mail server (internal.existingdomain.example).
How can I configure Exim4 to do that?
(...)
I think you want
Stan, just out of curiosity, in such a case as this would it be worth
trying to log in to the admin port on the router and muck with the
settings? Or is there a subtext of owned router in the conversation
here?
Joel
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Olivier BATARD obat...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/11/15 Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com:
On 11/15/2011 10:07 AM, Olivier BATARD wrote:
mynetworks = !192.168.150.254 192.168.150.0/24
The ! excludes the address.
Thanks that solve my problem
You're welcome. Due to the NAT source address rewrite problem, the
previous mynetworks
HI,
I'm a little in double because my postfix server is used to send an
huge amount of spam, generating huge logs like that :
postfix/error[2120]: 993AE145D: to=xbee...@yahoo.com.tw, relay=none,
delay=101, delays=100/0.07/0/0.31, dsn=4.7.0, status=deferred
(delivery temporarily suspended: host
are secured with strong password, town
can I stop that ?
thanks,
Some log entries from when the message was submitted from the spammer
into your mail system would be more useful, instead of the log entries
from when your mail server then tried to deliver it.
Is it possible you have an account
.html)
I'm running squeeze, my account are secured with strong password, town
can I stop that ?
thanks,
Some log entries from when the message was submitted from the spammer
into your mail system would be more useful, instead of the log entries
from when your mail server then tried to deliver
be more useful, instead of the log entries from when
your mail server then tried to deliver it.
Is it possible you have an account on your system with an easy to guess
(or empty) password? Look in your system log for when the connection came
in from the spammer, and see if it shows they actually
On 11/15/2011 5:44 AM, Olivier BATARD wrote:
Thanks for the answer, when I run a grep -e connect from on the
syslog I got this :
Nov 15 12:32:47 VOLTALIAMSG postfix/smtpd[31110]: disconnect from
unknown[192.168.150.254]
Nov 15 12:32:49 VOLTALIAMSG postfix/smtpd[31102]: connect from
2011/11/15 Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com:
On 11/15/2011 5:44 AM, Olivier BATARD wrote:
Thanks for the answer, when I run a grep -e connect from on the
syslog I got this :
Nov 15 12:32:47 VOLTALIAMSG postfix/smtpd[31110]: disconnect from
unknown[192.168.150.254]
Nov 15 12:32:49
On 11/15/2011 10:07 AM, Olivier BATARD wrote:
mynetworks = !192.168.150.254 192.168.150.0/24
The ! excludes the address.
Thanks that solve my problem
You're welcome. Due to the NAT source address rewrite problem, the
previous mynetworks configuration made Postfix a wide open relay. I'm
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Rubbish. ;) There is no technical difference between a static IP and
dynamic WRT SMTP, thus one can properly run a mail server for both
sending and receiving directly. The problem one runs into here, which
is probably what you meant to say, is merely receiver policy
This is my first time ever working with a mail server. Thus, I don't know what
I'm doing, but I'm trying to learn.
All I'm trying to do right now is send and receive email messages through my
free DynDNS account. Let's say it's subdomain1.dyndns-free.com .
The OS is Debian Lenny. The mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Do I need an MX hostname? There are so many unknowns that I don't know where
to begin.
Yes, you need a MX hostname and reverse DNS. Set the reverse DNS
hostname to the HELO hostname your SMTP server uses, as well as your MX
hostname.
About the
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 01:13:57 -0500
Jason Hsu jhsu802...@jasonhsu.com wrote:
This is my first time ever working with a mail server. Thus, I don't
know what I'm doing, but I'm trying to learn.
All I'm trying to do right now is send and receive email messages
through my free DynDNS account
Jason Hsu put forth on 3/15/2011 1:13 AM:
This is my first time ever working with a mail server. Thus, I don't know
what I'm doing, but I'm trying to learn.
This is bad because you're trying to do it with DynDNS. This prevents
you from being able to setup a standard internet mail host
is that the MX record has a corresponding A record as
well.
Also, as has been mentioned already, it is highly advisable to have rDNS
{reverse DNS) -- without it, you should be using smart host, ie your
ISP as an upstream sender.
Using dynamic IP means that you can't properly run your own mail
setup relay via SMTP
auth to his ISPs relays.
Using dynamic IP means that you can't properly run your own mail server
for both sending and receiving directly.
Rubbish. ;) There is no technical difference between a static IP and
dynamic WRT SMTP, thus one can properly run a mail server for both
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:58:01 -0600, mike cutie and maia wrote:
I am new when it comes to setting up mail servers I got my bind9 to work
but I need some instructions to set up a mail server with pop3 and also
to make sure that people using Microsoft can fatch and retrieve mail
from the server
Hi all,
I am new when it comes to setting up mail servers I got my bind9 to work but
I need some instructions to set up a mail server with pop3 and also to make
sure that people using Microsoft can fatch and retrieve mail from the server
any ideas?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ
On 03/01/2011 07:28 AM, mike cutie and maia wrote:
Hi all,
I am new when it comes to setting up mail servers I got my bind9 to work but
I need some instructions to set up a mail server with pop3 and also to make
sure that people using Microsoft can fatch and retrieve mail from the server
any
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
Right, thats what merrimac is doing (managing for the domain). What I am
not
understanding, is since everything should be going to the mailboxes on
merrimac, why it is trying to contact hornet again. The mail flow, as I
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 12:25:51 -0500, Brad Alexander wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Camaleón wrote:
Right, thats what merrimac is doing (managing for the domain). What
I am
not
understanding, is since everything should be going to the mailboxes
on merrimac, why it is trying
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 19:58:35 -0500, Brad Alexander wrote:
I have three mail server questions, if I might.
(...)
On the mail server:
Feb 24 13:16:06 merrimac postfix/qmgr[14271]: A5D97F1852: from=
r...@hornet.bar.com, size=1143, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Feb 24 13:16:06
merrimac postfix/smtp
El 2011-02-25 a las 13:47 -0500, Brad Alexander escribió:
(resending to the list)
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
r...@hornet.bar.com, relay=none, delay=0.05, delays=0.04/0.01/0/0,
dsn=4.4.1, status=deferred (connect to hornet.bar.com[192.168.1.13]:25:
I have three mail server questions, if I might.
1. I have set up most of the systems on my network to use my mail server for
internal mail, things like ossec messages, apticron, etc. Most hosts run
exim, so I have them set up with the mail server as my smarthost. However,
one box, running Proxmox
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 08:10:10AM +0530, Abdullah wrote:
I want to setup a mailserver on a debian machine. please help me as i have
not got a perfect answer by googling.
I wuld like to use squirrelmail. please help.
First set up a nameserver, see
/usr/share/doc/HOWTO/en-txt/DNS-HOWTO.gz.
I want to setup a mailserver on a debian machine. please help me as i have
not got a perfect answer by googling.
I wuld like to use squirrelmail. please help.
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Carlos Mennens carlosw...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com
On 26/10/10 13:20, Carlos Mennens wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Camaleónnoela...@gmail.com wrote:
I like Postfix and Dovecot :-)
I think Postfix is the best open source MTA available on Linux hands
down. I have used Sendmail, Qmail, and Exim and none of them have
given me the
Postfix + Cyrus + SASL for simple users. You can add spamassassin +
pyzor/rzor config your SASL to use LDAP or other auth method. For me
postfix + cyrus is just a better combi.
On Wednesday, 27 October, 2010 04:13 PM, Alan Chandler wrote:
On 26/10/10 13:20, Carlos Mennens wrote:
On Tue, Oct
1 - 100 of 854 matches
Mail list logo
