Hi,
some time ago I installed a little server at home to use it as firewall and
mailserver. I got the mail using fetchmail, scanned with spamassassin and the
delivered and filter with exim. Something that a lot of pages have explained.
I'm using sarge in a P100 with 64Mb of ram. Little
Użytkownik o2 napisał:
Czy ktoś zna może adres jakiejś strony z dokładny opisem
konfiguracjaii spamassassin-a z exim 3 ???
proponuję zacząć od tego: http://www.debianusers.pl/article.php?aid=62
spamassasina podłączysz do amavisa a nie bezpośrednio do exima.
pozdrawiam
pr
Czy ktoś zna może adres jakiejś
strony z dokładny opisem konfiguracjaii spamassassin-a z exim 3
???
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003 05:42:50 -0700
Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 10:16:14PM -0400, Jeff Elkins wrote:
Kmail doesn't show your email as having an attachment. Would that be the
gpg?
Yup, that's it. View the
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003 05:45:10 -0700
Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kmail does allow you to define filters, but wouldn't it be better to let
exim do the filtering before the mail reaches the MUA?
exim doesn't do filtering, but procmail does.
Not true in multiple cases.
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003 14:15:09 -0400
kenneth dombrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well, there's definitely something wrong with my setup since upgrading
from 2.43 - 2.55 this past week, I've fed sa-learn almost 2k --spam
and 4k --ham messages, and I'm yet to see a single BAYES_* test in the
into your personal filter and looking at it from the global or
vice versa?
Thank you, Steve, your last question prompted me to rethink what was
going on. I am calling spamc via dman's SpamAssassin/Exim 3 method
(which must run as user mail to set $received_protocol) but calling
sa-learn as my user. I
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003 03:19:12 -0400
kenneth dombrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the end it might have been easier to just filter @ the Procmail
level, but I understand with Exim4 it's possible to reject mail @ the
SMTP level based on SA results.. which seems like a desirable thing to
On 03-09-01 01:48 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
Actually it is a more secure version of what I have done here. In fact I
do it the really half-baked way by adding myself to the mail and gave myself
sudo access to chmod to get the directories to the right permission.
cool. thanks for the
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 15:04:59 -0400
Jeff Elkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I used spamc ./$1 | grep '^X-Spam' and it identified an obvious piece of
spam, and my emails now contain: Received: from mail by elkins.org with
spam-scanned (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
Your stats on mail processed is
On Saturday 30 August 2003 8:39 pm, Steve Lamb wrote:
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 15:04:59 -0400
Jeff Elkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I used spamc ./$1 | grep '^X-Spam' and it identified an obvious piece of
spam, and my emails now contain: Received: from mail by elkins.org with
spam-scanned (Exim
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 22:16:14 -0400
Jeff Elkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kmail doesn't show your email as having an attachment. Would that be the
gpg?
Yup.
At any rate, almost 99% of the spam I get is HTML, but I get your drift of
letting SA handle the catagorization of email. Like I
On Saturday 30 August 2003 10:19 pm, Steve Lamb wrote:
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 22:16:14 -0400
Jeff Elkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kmail doesn't show your email as having an attachment. Would that be the
gpg?
Yup.
At any rate, almost 99% of the spam I get is HTML, but I get your drift of
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 22:35:20 -0400
Jeff Elkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that I'm using SA, I'm using Bayesian filtering, yes?
If you turned it on, yes.
Kmail does allow you to define filters, but wouldn't it be better to let
exim do the filtering before the mail reaches the MUA?
Steve Lamb wrote:
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 22:35:20 -0400
Jeff Elkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that I'm using SA, I'm using Bayesian filtering, yes?
If you turned it on, yes.
Kmail does allow you to define filters, but wouldn't it be better to let
exim do the filtering before the mail
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 23:18:59 -0400
Tom Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From what I'm seeing in the logs and in the docs is that Bayesian filtering
is enabled by default. But it is not used until there is (IIRC) 200 emails
of both spam and ham built into the database.
Did I miss
Steve Lamb wrote:
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 23:18:59 -0400
Tom Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From what I'm seeing in the logs and in the docs is that Bayesian filtering
is enabled by default. But it is not used until there is (IIRC) 200 emails
of both spam and ham built into the database.
Did I
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 23:40:13 -0400
Tom Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It may be turned on in the config files, but I am guessing that the code is
skipping the bayesian score contribution until the mail count gets to 200 on
each side (ham/spam).
Right.
I just grabbed a lot of email I
On Saturday 30 August 2003 11:48 pm, Steve Lamb wrote:
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 23:40:13 -0400
Tom Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It may be turned on in the config files, but I am guessing that the code
is skipping the bayesian score contribution until the mail count gets to
200 on each side
Also Sprach Jeff McAdams
Also Sprach Paul Johnson
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 10:16:14PM -0400, Jeff Elkins wrote:
Kmail doesn't show your email as having an attachment. Would that be
the gpg?
Yup, that's it. View the raw message and you'll see that it's a
multipart MIME message. As is mine.
Of
Also Sprach Paul Johnson
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 10:16:14PM -0400, Jeff Elkins wrote:
Kmail doesn't show your email as having an attachment. Would that be
the gpg?
Yup, that's it. View the raw message and you'll see that it's a
multipart MIME message. As is mine.
Of course, multipart MIME is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 08:56:43AM -0400, Jeff McAdams wrote:
Of course, multipart MIME is strictly the same thing as an attachment.
Specifically, the various parts of multipart/signed messages are shown
as inline rather than attached. The
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 11:06:16AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
Yes, whereas mutt really does the job right. It's a bummer nobody's
made a KDE shell for mutt to bring the joy of mutt to the Windows
convert newbies. It would totally blow their minds.
KDE shell for mutt? What's konsole, then?
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 05:45:10AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
exim doesn't do filtering, but procmail does. You may find procmail
better suited to your needs, but a good part of the decision is
personal choice.
Er, exim most certainly does do filtering. There's a lot to be said for
rejecting
what a timely thread!
excuse me for interrupting,
On 03-08-30 20:48 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
You can tell by looking at the headers and seeing if BAYES_xx shows up.
The xx is the approx. range that the Bayesian filter places the particular
piece of mail. For example here's the score
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 11:16:42AM -0700, Marc Wilson wrote:
KDE shell for mutt? What's konsole, then?
No, I meant like a GUI frontend.
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :' :
`. `'` proud Debian admin and user
`- Debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 10:35:20PM -0400, Jeff Elkins wrote:
Now that I'm using SA, I'm using Bayesian filtering, yes?
That is correct.
Kmail does allow you to define filters, but wouldn't it be better to let exim
do the filtering before the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 10:16:14PM -0400, Jeff Elkins wrote:
Kmail doesn't show your email as having an attachment. Would that be the gpg?
Yup, that's it. View the raw message and you'll see that it's a
multipart MIME message. As is mine.
At any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 08:27:43PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
Did I miss something?
How does it get to that 200 mark of ham and spam?
I got bored last night. Really bored. Waiting for 2.6.0-test2 to
compile bored. In the mean time, I went
On Friday 29 August 2003 2:21 pm, Michael Heldebrant wrote:
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 12:23, Jeff Elkins wrote:
Is there a FAQ available for setting up Spamassassin and exim? Googling
found several for SA + postfix, but not for exim.
Thanks,
Jeff Elkins
I'm not sure if there is a complete FAQ
Is there a FAQ available for setting up Spamassassin and exim? Googling found
several for SA + postfix, but not for exim.
Thanks,
Jeff Elkins
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 13:23:51 -0400
Jeff Elkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a FAQ available for setting up Spamassassin and exim? Googling
found several for SA + postfix, but not for exim.
Ya sure about that? Seems to me that the 2nd link for a search on
Spamassassin Exim is pretty
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 01:23:51PM -0400, Jeff Elkins wrote:
| Is there a FAQ available for setting up Spamassassin and exim?
| Googling found several for SA + postfix, but not for exim.
Try again.
http://www.google.com/search?q=exim%20spamassassin
Or look on the spamassassin home page.
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 12:23, Jeff Elkins wrote:
Is there a FAQ available for setting up Spamassassin and exim? Googling found
several for SA + postfix, but not for exim.
Thanks,
Jeff Elkins
I'm not sure if there is a complete FAQ available. This is how I have
spamc integrated into
that the 2nd link for a search on
Spamassassin Exim is pretty darn useful all things considered.
http://dman13.dyndns.org/~dman/config_docs/exim-spamassassin/
I must have screwed up my query. Re-searching found several.
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Andreas,
* Mit Exim4 als Transport (das mueste sich aber auch fuer v3
adaptieren lassen).
http://dman.ddts.net/~dman/config_docs/exim4_spamassassin.html
Für exim3 gibt es dort auch eine sehr gute Anleitung unter
Hallo Freunde von Debian
Wie sieht es aus mit dem Exim und Spamassassin habe eine Installation mit
apt-get install spamassassin
gemacht nun weiss ich nicht weiter! Wer kann mir helfen?
Grüsse aus der Schweiz
Stefan
--
Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ):
On Sat, 31 May 2003 the mental interface of
Stefan Risse told:
Hallo Freunde von Debian
Wie sieht es aus mit dem Exim und Spamassassin habe eine Installation mit
apt-get install spamassassin
gemacht nun weiss ich nicht weiter! Wer kann mir helfen?
/etc/init.d/spamd start
Studiere
Hallo Stefan,
* Stefan Risse schrieb [31-05-03 22:42]:
Wie sieht es aus mit dem Exim und Spamassassin habe eine Installation mit
apt-get install spamassassin
gemacht nun weiss ich nicht weiter! Wer kann mir helfen?
man spamassassin
ls -l /usr/share/doc/spamassassin
man google
Gruss Udo
Stefan Risse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wie sieht es aus mit dem Exim und Spamassassin habe eine Installation mit
apt-get install spamassassin
gemacht nun weiss ich nicht weiter! Wer kann mir helfen?
Kommt darauf an, was du mit welcher Version von Exim willst:
* Integration in procmail: Siehe
In der Konfigurationsdatei von Exim müssen die
notwendigen Eintragungen vorhanden sein.
Es muss ein Router definiert werden, bzw. ein Director,
wenn Sie noch Exim3 benutzen und natürlich ein Transport.
Beispiel für den Router:
--- SNIP
#
Hallo Elimar,
* Elimar Riesebieter schrieb [31-05-03 23:22]:
/etc/init.d/spamd start
Dieses Initscript hat wohl keiner auf dem Rechner. Außerdem:
$EDITOR /etc/default/spamassassin
Gruss Udo
--
Übrigens gibt es jetzt eine Briefmarke von Bill Gates. Leider klebt die
nicht so richtig. Eine
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 10:59:12AM -0400, Kevin Coyner wrote:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 12:52:56AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote..
Can anyone recommend a good way to integrate spamassassin with exim?
apt-get install procmail. Then, in your ~/.procmail/rc.recipe file,
make sure you have
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 12:52:56AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
Can anyone recommend a good way to integrate spamassassin with exim?
I tried the instructions at
http://dman.ddts.net/~dman/config_docs/exim3_spamassassin.html
to use it as a transport filter, but I just unexpected EOF during
On 16 Oct 2002, Iain. wrote:
Gottfried Szing [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i would suggest to replace the spamassassin with spamc/spamd. spamd is a
daemon which runs in the background and spamc controls the daemon.
I've got a couple of problems with spamd. First is that it doesn't
appear to
Can anyone recommend a good way to integrate spamassassin with exim?
I tried the instructions at
http://dman.ddts.net/~dman/config_docs/exim3_spamassassin.html
to use it as a transport filter, but I just unexpected EOF during smtp
type errors from the spawned exim.
I set up an awful kludge in
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 12:52:56AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote..
Can anyone recommend a good way to integrate spamassassin with exim?
apt-get install procmail. Then, in your ~/.procmail/rc.recipe file,
make sure you have something like:
## filter all mail through SpamAssassin
On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 16:59, Kevin Coyner wrote:
apt-get install procmail. Then, in your ~/.procmail/rc.recipe file,
make sure you have something like:
## filter all mail through SpamAssassin ##
:0 fw
| spamassassin -P
i would suggest to replace the spamassassin with
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 05:22:10PM +0200, Gottfried Szing wrote..
On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 16:59, Kevin Coyner wrote:
apt-get install procmail. Then, in your ~/.procmail/rc.recipe file,
make sure you have something like:
## filter all mail through SpamAssassin ##
This one time, at band camp, Kevin Coyner said:
If I run spamc/spamd, then would my procmail recipe simple be ...
## filter all mail through SpamAssassin ##
:0 fw
| spamassassin
Or something different?
Thanks
Kevin
The site http://spamassassin.org/sitewide.html says
Hello Kevin,
On Oct 16, Kevin Coyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| If I run spamc/spamd, then would my procmail recipe simple be ...
|
| ## filter all mail through SpamAssassin ##
| :0 fw
| | spamassassin
|
| Or something different?
The following two blocks are my first
Gottfried Szing [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i would suggest to replace the spamassassin with spamc/spamd. spamd is a
daemon which runs in the background and spamc controls the daemon.
I've got a couple of problems with spamd. First is that it doesn't
appear to start correctly if I'm offline. I
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 12:52:56AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
Can anyone recommend a good way to integrate spamassassin with exim?
I tried the instructions at
http://dman.ddts.net/~dman/config_docs/exim3_spamassassin.html
to use it as a transport filter, but I just unexpected EOF during
Le ven 14/06/2002 à 18:02, Jacques L'helgoualc'h a écrit :
le couple client/démon spam[cd] est bien plus rapide quand on récupère
son courrier par paquets.
# utilise le daemon spamd
:0 fw
| spamc
pour l'instant ni spamassassin, ni spam[cd] fonctionnent chez moi :
je n'ai pas de header
en fait je n'ai rien touché a ce niveau par rapport a la config par
défaut.
les mails qui arrivent par fetchmail ne sont pas analysés non plus
fetchmail tourne en démon, allant chercher les mails toutes les 300
secondes
dans /etc/fetchmailrc, il n'y a rien concernant procmail
Oui, dans ton .fetchmailrc, il faut ajouter après les poll
mda /usr/bin/procmail -Y -d %T
(en vérifiant le chemin vers procmail bien sur)
j'ai ajouté ca dans mon /etc/fetchmailrc
cependant j'ai une erreur quand fetchmail va chercher les mails :
Insecure dependency in mkdir while running
On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 10:55:38AM +0200, Grégoire Cachet wrote:
Oui, dans ton .fetchmailrc, il faut ajouter après les poll
mda /usr/bin/procmail -Y -d %T
(en vérifiant le chemin vers procmail bien sur)
j'ai ajouté ca dans mon /etc/fetchmailrc
cependant j'ai une erreur quand
Le 15.06.02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
| On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 10:55:38AM +0200, Grégoire Cachet wrote:
|
| Oui, dans ton .fetchmailrc, il faut ajouter après les poll
| mda /usr/bin/procmail -Y -d %T
| (en vérifiant le chemin vers procmail bien sur)
|
| j'ai ajouté ca dans mon
Grégoire Cachet a écrit, samedi 15 juin 2002, à 10:55 :
[...]
/etc/procmailrc contenant :
:0 fw
| spamassassin
je fais comment pour corriger ca ?
| spamassassin -P
--
Jacques L'helgoualc'h
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
j'aimerais mettre en place une solution pour éliminer la majeure partie
de ce spam
Si cela peut t'aider, j'ai écrit cette doc d'intégration d'Exim et de
SPAMASSASSIN il y quelques temps.
Stef...
..
. Linux - Debian - php4 - Apache -
Le sam 15/06/2002 à 11:34, Thomas Nemeth a écrit :
Le 15.06.02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
| On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 10:55:38AM +0200, Grégoire Cachet wrote:
|
| Oui, dans ton .fetchmailrc, il faut ajouter après les poll
| mda /usr/bin/procmail -Y -d %T
| (en vérifiant le chemin
Le sam 15/06/2002 à 11:26, Jacques L'helgoualc'h a écrit :
Grégoire Cachet a écrit, samedi 15 juin 2002, à 10:55 :
[...]
/etc/procmailrc contenant :
:0 fw
| spamassassin
je fais comment pour corriger ca ?
| spamassassin -P
ca ne change rien
merci
grégoire
--
Ceux qui ne
Le sam 15/06/2002 à 12:03, Stephane Leclerc a écrit :
j'aimerais mettre en place une solution pour éliminer la majeure partie
de ce spam
Si cela peut t'aider, j'ai écrit cette doc d'intégration d'Exim et de
SPAMASSASSIN il y quelques temps.
interessant ;-)
Applications needed: exim
Create a basic setup for GLOBAL user in the userpref table.
que veux-tu dire par la ?
Pour que le système marche, il faut au moins un enregistrement dans la base
de données. L'enregistrement GLOBAL.
INSERT INTO userpref VALUES ('GLOBAL', 'rewrite_subject', '0', 303);
INSERT INTO userpref
Le 15.06.02, Grégoire Cachet a tapoté :
| Le sam 15/06/2002 à 11:34, Thomas Nemeth a écrit :
| Le 15.06.02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
|
| | mda /usr/bin/procmail -Y -d %T
| | j'ai ajouté ca dans mon /etc/fetchmailrc
|
| Ce n'est pas forcément nécessaire : si la config de fetchmail
Le sam 15/06/2002 à 23:35, Thomas Nemeth a écrit :
Dans ce cas il faut que ton serveur SMTP soit ouvert à
l'extérieur. Perso, je ne le fais pas...
je le fais, et ca marche tres bien jusqu'a présent (surtout quand
wanadoo marche plus, c'est hyper pratique !)
Soit via
bonjour
on parle pas mal de spam en ce moment, alors j'en profite.
je recois plusieurs spams par jours( 15 ), dont au moins la moitié
vient de corée
ma passerelle ( en woody ) vers internet se charge de récuperer les
mails, et ce, de deux manieres :
via exim (serveur smtp fonctionnel a
Le ven 14/06/2002 à 17:12, Lam a écrit :
en fait j'ai juste rajouter une ligne dans .procmailrc
et deja il me met dans le rep spam presque tous les spams que je
recevais :
:0 fw
| spamassassin -P
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
caughtspam
j'ai ajouté ca dans /etc/procmailrc
que
Lam a écrit, vendredi 14 juin 2002, à 17:12 :
[...]
en fait j'ai juste rajouter une ligne dans .procmailrc
et deja il me met dans le rep spam presque tous les spams que je
recevais :
:0 fw
| spamassassin -P
le couple client/démon spam[cd] est bien plus rapide quand on récupère
son
69 matches
Mail list logo
