Re: Debian stable - updates

On Sun, 27 Jun 2021 07:46:58 -0500 John Hasler wrote: > Joe writes: > > When I'm sufficiently > > annoyed with the problem I'll do a reinstall but there are over 4000 > > packages... > > While I don't upgrade daily it's bad to let it get that far behind. I do upgrade pretty much daily. I

Re: Debian stable - updates

Joe writes: > When I'm sufficiently > annoyed with the problem I'll do a reinstall but there are over 4000 > packages... While I don't upgrade daily it's bad to let it get that far behind. -- John Hasler j...@sugarbit.com Elmwood, WI USA

Re: Debian stable - updates

On 2021-06-27 at 03:48, Francesco Florian wrote: > On Sa, 26 Jun 2021, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > >> [1] unless you're one of those still running dist-upgrade for every >> security update, just because `apt-get` doesn't install new >> packages by default. > > Actually, I'm one of those running on

Re: Debian stable - updates

On 27-06-2021 18:01, Joe wrote: > On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 08:12:07 -0500 > John Hasler wrote: > >> Andrei writes: >> > Unstable is challenging when you rely on that system for any kind of >> > useful work, regardless if a movie night with friends or a big >> > presentation at work, as each and every

Re: Debian stable - updates

On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 08:12:07 -0500 John Hasler wrote: > Andrei writes: > > Unstable is challenging when you rely on that system for any kind of > > useful work, regardless if a movie night with friends or a big > > presentation at work, as each and every upgrade has the potential to > > break

Re: Debian stable - updates

On Sa, 26 Jun 2021, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > [1] unless you're one of those still running dist-upgrade for every > security update, just because `apt-get` doesn't install new packages by > default. Actually, I'm one of those running on testing, since I believe it's stable enough for my workflow

Re: Debian stable - updates

Andrei writes: > How do you determine the "safe and necessary"? I follow the security list and scan -dev for warning of such things as major transitions. I upgrade individual packages as needed (usually Firefox): this occasionally leads to a general upgrade. I pay attention to the output of

Re: Debian stable - updates

On Sb, 26 iun 21, 08:12:07, John Hasler wrote: > Andrei writes: > > Unstable is challenging when you rely on that system for any kind of > > useful work, regardless if a movie night with friends or a big > > presentation at work, as each and every upgrade has the potential to > > break your system

Re: Debian stable - updates

Andrei writes: > Unstable is challenging when you rely on that system for any kind of > useful work, regardless if a movie night with friends or a big > presentation at work, as each and every upgrade has the potential to > break your system in new and interesting ways. I've run Unstable on my

Re: Debian stable - updates

Hi and a very good day to all of you,  thank you very much for the new input of yours. You're too kind. @T.J. Duchene: Thanks a lot for the warm welcome. That' s really nice. I enjoy it very much here. Your instruction to update policies used by Debian stable is very good; I understand it

Re: Debian stable - updates

On Vi, 25 iun 21, 15:50:56, steve wrote: > Le 25-06-2021, à 06:38:32 -0600, D. R. Evans a écrit : > > > For years I have run debian stable on my main desktop machine (the one I > > am using to type this e-mail). It has had fewer major issues than any > > other distribution I have tried. > > Some

Re: Debian stable - updates

On Vi, 25 iun 21, 15:02:51, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 02:19:34PM +0200, Christian wrote: > > Hi altogether, > > [...] > > > I quote: > > > [...] There is a tradeoff, though. The software in Debian Stable is > > usually fairly outdated. > > In fact, it's usually outdated

Re: Debian stable - updates

On Vi, 25 iun 21, 20:44:51, Francesco Florian wrote: > > You may want to change all instances of 'buster' to 'stable', so that > you don't have to bother changing it whenever new version of debian is > released as stable. > This is, if you really want to track 'stable', i.e., automatically >

Re: Debian stable - updates

On Friday, June 25, 2021 7:19:34 AM CDT Christian wrote: > Hi altogether, > > as I´m a newcomer to Debian and coming from Lubuntu I searched for > information as far as the release model is concerned. > > I learned that there are three different releases: stable, testing, and > unstable. > > I

Re: Debian stable - updates

On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 03:18:06PM +0200, Christian wrote: > Hi Tomas, > > thank you so much for your reply. > > > Thing is: "stable" means [...]  Only bug fixes and security patches go in. > > Great! That is the most important aspect for me. > I really don't need the latest-and-greatest

Re: Debian stable - updates

On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 03:06:57PM +0200, Christian wrote: > Hi Doc Evans, > > thanks a lot for your reply. > > That´s great news indeed. > The fact that Debian stable is rock solid is a great asset in itself. So > together with security updates it will surely make for a fine production > system

Re: Debian stable - updates

On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 08:44:51PM +0200, Francesco Florian wrote: > On Fr, 25 Jun 2021, Christian wrote: > > > I looked up  the respective file on my system and it looks like this: > > 1     # > > 2 > > 3     # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 10.9.0 _Buster_ - Official amd64 > > xfce-CD Binary-1

Re: Debian stable - updates

On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 08:44:51PM +0200, Francesco Florian wrote: > You may want to change all instances of 'buster' to 'stable', so that you > don't have to bother changing it whenever new version of debian is released > as stable. STRONG disagree! You don't want that, because it means that

Re: Debian stable - updates

On Fr, 25 Jun 2021, Christian wrote: > I looked up  the respective file on my system and it looks like this: > 1     # > 2 > 3     # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 10.9.0 _Buster_ - Official amd64 > xfce-CD Binary-1 20210327-10:42]/ buster main > 4 > 5     #deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 10.9.0

Re: Debian stable - updates

Hi Greg, thank you very much for your help. It's highly appreciated. It's so good to have have some confirmation by such knowledgeable people like you. So for now I think I won't have to change anything as I'm currently running Debian stable in a virtual machine. Yet when setting it  up as

Re: Debian stable - updates

On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 06:11:17PM +0200, Christian wrote: > I see. So in case I want it I'd have to add "contrib" and "non-free" in line > 7 first. > > Perhaps I'm a bit slow to understand, but what about lines 8, 11, 14 and 15 > then? All these also contain just "main". Would they have to be

Re: Debian stable - updates

Hi Greg, thank you so much for your very quick reply. > It's not necessary at this time. Good to know. I see. So in case I want it I'd have to add "contrib" and "non-free" in line 7 first. Perhaps I'm a bit slow to understand, but what about lines 8, 11, 14 and 15 then? All these also

Re: Debian stable - updates

On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 05:55:18PM +0200, Christian wrote: > On https://www.debian.org/security/#keeping-secure under "Keeping your > Debian system secure" it says: > > "You can use apt to easily get the latest security updates. This requires a > line such as deb

Re: Debian stable - updates

Hi again, so sorry to bother you kind people once more. It turns out I've got an additional question regarding  updates. On https://www.debian.org/security/#keeping-secure under "Keeping your Debian system secure" it says: "You can use apt to easily get the latest security updates. This

Re: Debian stable - updates

Le 25-06-2021, à 06:38:32 -0600, D. R. Evans a écrit : For years I have run debian stable on my main desktop machine (the one I am using to type this e-mail). It has had fewer major issues than any other distribution I have tried. Some even say that Debian is becoming annoying for that very

Re: Debian stable - updates

Hi Didar, thanks for your opinion as well. Good to learn there are so many users satisfied with Debian stable. Many greetings. Rosika

Re: Debian stable - updates

On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 06:38:32AM -0600, D. R. Evans wrote: > Christian wrote on 6/25/21 6:19 AM: > > > > > > Is Debian stable safe to use - I mean in the sense that it gets security > > updates for the installed packages? > > > > Yes, it does get security updates. It also gets non-security

Re: Debian stable - updates

Hi Tomas, thank you so much for your reply. > Thing is: "stable" means [...]  Only bug fixes and security patches go in. Great! That is the most important aspect for me. I really don't need the latest-and-greatest version of packages. All I do need is a stable and secure system. So Debian

Re: Debian stable - updates

Hi Doc Evans, thanks a lot for your reply. That´s great news indeed. The fact that Debian stable is rock solid is a great asset in itself. So together with security updates it will surely make for a fine production system especially for older computers like my Lenovo H520e desktop. Thank

Re: Debian stable - updates

On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 02:19:34PM +0200, Christian wrote: > Hi altogether, [...] > I quote: > [...] There is a tradeoff, though. The software in Debian Stable is > usually fairly outdated. > In fact, it's usually outdated when the distribution first ships. > Now, that's not much of a problem

Re: Debian stable - updates

Christian wrote on 6/25/21 6:19 AM: Is Debian stable safe to use - I mean in the sense that it gets security updates for the installed packages? Yes, it does get security updates. It also gets non-security updates for some of the most popular packages. For years I have run debian stable

Debian stable - updates

Hi altogether, as I´m a newcomer to Debian and coming from Lubuntu I searched for information as far as the release model is concerned. I learned that there are three different releases: stable, testing, and unstable. I know I´m not supposed to post any links here but for the sake of

Re: Debian Stable Updates Announcement SUA 197-1

On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 04:04:29PM -0700, David Christensen wrote: > On 3/23/21 12:31 PM, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 10:40:01AM -0700, David Christensen wrote: > > > > I use Stretch for my daily driver laptop (Dell Latitude E6520) and UniFi > > > Controller VPS. ... > >

Re: Debian Stable Updates Announcement SUA 197-1

On 3/23/21 12:31 PM, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 10:40:01AM -0700, David Christensen wrote: I use Stretch for my daily driver laptop (Dell Latitude E6520) and UniFi Controller VPS. ... I need to migrate the daily driver to Buster, but Buster does not like the Optimus

Re: Debian Stable Updates Announcement SUA 197-1

On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 10:40:01AM -0700, David Christensen wrote: > On 3/23/21 9:44 AM, David Wright wrote: > > On Tue 23 Mar 2021 at 07:52:52 (-0400), The Wanderer wrote: > > > On 2021-03-23 at 07:43, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > > > > > I think the request was really "Please tell us how to use

Re: Debian Stable Updates Announcement SUA 197-1

On 3/23/21 9:44 AM, David Wright wrote: On Tue 23 Mar 2021 at 07:52:52 (-0400), The Wanderer wrote: On 2021-03-23 at 07:43, Greg Wooledge wrote: I think the request was really "Please tell us how to use this buster-proposed-updates thing, which I've never heard of before." Actually I

Re: Debian Stable Updates Announcement SUA 197-1

mirror. > > Thank you for the response. > > Browsing: > > http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/dists/buster-proposed-updates/ > > Yes, I do see many *.changes files (one for each package and > architecture combination). > > But, that does not tell me how to

Re: Debian Stable Updates Announcement SUA 197-1

On Tue 23 Mar 2021 at 07:52:52 (-0400), The Wanderer wrote: > On 2021-03-23 at 07:43, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > I think the request was really "Please tell us how to use this > > buster-proposed-updates thing, which I've never heard of before." Actually I thought David wanted to do what I did,

Re: Debian Stable Updates Announcement SUA 197-1

On 3/23/21 4:43 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 10:34:12PM -0500, David Wright wrote: On Mon 22 Mar 2021 at 17:26:14 (-0700), David Christensen wrote: On 3/22/21 5:03 PM, Keith Wyatt wrote: As o[f] now it will include the following bug fixes. They can be found in "buster-

Re: Debian Stable Updates Announcement SUA 197-1

t proposed Debian Stable updates are available (for testing). Assuming that I start with a fresh install of: debian-10.8.0-amd64-xfce-CD-1.iso How do I download and/or install the proposed updates? That is the URL I need. David

Re: Debian Stable Updates Announcement SUA 197-1

On Ma, 23 mar 21, 07:52:52, The Wanderer wrote: > On 2021-03-23 at 07:43, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > I think the request was really "Please tell us how to use this > > buster-proposed-updates thing, which I've never heard of before." > > > > Here's a wiki page:

Re: Debian Stable Updates Announcement SUA 197-1

On 2021-03-23 at 07:43, Greg Wooledge wrote: > I think the request was really "Please tell us how to use this > buster-proposed-updates thing, which I've never heard of before." > > Here's a wiki page: > However, I would not follow its advice

Re: Debian Stable Updates Announcement SUA 197-1

On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 10:34:12PM -0500, David Wright wrote: > On Mon 22 Mar 2021 at 17:26:14 (-0700), David Christensen wrote: > > On 3/22/21 5:03 PM, Keith Wyatt wrote: > > > > > As o[f] > > > now it will include the following bug fixes. They can be found in "buster- > > > proposed-updates",

Re: Debian Stable Updates Announcement SUA 197-1

On Mon 22 Mar 2021 at 17:26:14 (-0700), David Christensen wrote: > On 3/22/21 5:03 PM, Keith Wyatt wrote: > > > As o[f] > > now it will include the following bug fixes. They can be found in "buster- > > proposed-updates", which is carried by all official mirrors. > > Please provide a URL. Do

Re: Debian Stable Updates Announcement SUA 197-1

On 3/22/21 5:03 PM, Keith Wyatt wrote: As o now it will include the following bug fixes. They can be found in "buster- proposed-updates", which is carried by all official mirrors. Please provide a URL. David

Debian Stable Updates Announcement SUA 197-1

Debian Stable Updates Announcement SUA 197-1 https://www.debian.org/ debian-rele...@lists.debian.org Adam D. Barratt March 22nd, 2021

Re: stable-updates versus volatile

-updates entry in the release notes. That along with the statement that stable-updates replaces volatile, I thought, was enough of a hint. Cheers, Tom Well after more digging I found a sample sources.list for a new Squeeze install in case anyone else (besides me) on this list doesn't get

Re: stable-updates versus volatile

On Mi, 09 feb 11, 20:13:06, Arthur Machlas wrote: Thanks! I was getting error messages and hadn't gotten around to looking into it. I didn't really read the release notes looking for information about the sources list. I kind of assumed the installer would set them up properly. Doesn't make

Re: stable-updates versus volatile

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Andrei Popescu andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote: On Mi, 09 feb 11, 20:13:06, Arthur Machlas wrote: SNIP would set them up properly. Doesn't make sense for a clean install of Debian 6 to put invalid repositories in your sources.list If this the final version of

stable-updates versus volatile

, this is not documented in Release Notes. deb http://volatile.debian.org/debian-volatile lenny/volatile main deb-src http://volatile.debian.org/debian-volatile lenny/volatile main Yes it is. Specifically section 2.1.8. Stable-updates replaces the functionality previously provided by volatile. Cheers, Tom

Re: stable-updates versus volatile

something else? Sorry for the extra question, this is not documented in Release Notes. deb http://volatile.debian.org/debian-volatile lenny/volatile main deb-src http://volatile.debian.org/debian-volatile lenny/volatile main Yes it is. Specifically section 2.1.8. Stable-updates replaces

Re: stable-updates versus volatile

that stable-updates replaces volatile, I thought, was enough of a hint. Cheers, Tom signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: stable-updates versus volatile

entry in the release notes. That along with the statement that stable-updates replaces volatile, I thought, was enough of a hint. I got the hint from the release notes, but I needed to check the archives of this list for instructions how to do it. Maybe I didn't read the release notes carefully

Re: stable-updates versus volatile

/volatile main Yes it is. Specifically section 2.1.8. Stable-updates replaces the functionality previously provided by volatile. I think the implication was that the release notes doesn't tell you how to edit the lines that refer to volatile. If your volatile line look like this: deb http

Fwd: For those who care about stable updates

Til orientering! :-( -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: For those who care about stable updates Date: Thursday 09 March 2006 11:32 From: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Development Announcements debian-devel-announce@lists.debian.org I'm sorry to announce

Re: Fwd: For those who care about stable updates

* Niels Larsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-09 12:24:28]: Til orientering! :-( det är faktist ett bra medelande, eftersom har löst problemet genom att flytta på sig och nya som kan samarbeta med ftp-master ha tagit över. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Fwd: For those who care about stable updates

Andreas Schuldei wrote: det är faktist ett bra medelande, eftersom har löst problemet genom att flytta på sig och nya som kan samarbeta med ftp-master ha tagit över. Menar du att Martin har haft samarbetsproblem? Jag är inte så insatt i hur det har arbetats med de där frågorna egentligen men

Re: Fwd: For those who care about stable updates

* Martin Leben [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-09 13:38:42]: Hej Andreas! Andreas Schuldei wrote: det är faktist ett bra medelande, eftersom har löst problemet genom att flytta på sig och nya som kan samarbeta med ftp-master ha tagit över. Hmmm... Jag förstår tyvärr inte vad du säger. -

Fwd: For those who care about stable updates (update)

-- Forwarded Message -- Subject: For those who care about stable updates (update) Date: Thursday 09 March 2006 18:26 From: Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: debian-devel-announce@lists.debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! As you all probably

Re: Stable Updates zu DSA 815-1 (kdebase)

On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 08:30:31PM +0200, Thomas Kosch wrote: Nein. Apt ist hier unschuldig. Es kann ja nicht wissen welche Teile des Gesamtpaketes sich geändert haben. Der in meinen Augen einzig sinnvolle Weg das zu lösen, ist der, den z.B SuSE geht. Die erstellen keine komletten Binär-Pakete

Re: Stable Updates zu DSA 815-1 (kdebase)

On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 02:46:29AM +0200, Gerhard Brauer wrote: So gehe ich vor: a) apt-dsl.sh liegt bei mir auf einem nfs-share in einem eigenen [...] Danke! ciao, Dirk -- | Akkuschrauber Kaufberatung and AEG GSM stuff | | Visit my homepage: http://www.nutrimatic.ping.de/

Re: Stable Updates zu DSA 815-1 (kdebase)

Moinmoin, On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 01:13:40AM +0200, Gerhard Brauer wrote: * Thomas Kosch [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am [19.09.05 20:30]: On Day 43 of Bureaucracy 3171, Gerhard Brauer wrote: Ja, aber beim Bauen wird doch in einzelne Pakete (xterm,xfonts,...) aufgesplittet. Warum stellt

Re: Stable Updates zu DSA 815-1 (kdebase)

Gruesse! * Florian Ernst [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am [20.09.05 11:33]: Moinmoin, [...] Danke für eure Ausführungen. Es hat bei mir auch den Blick wieder etwas mehr geöffnet dahin, daß einer reinen (Nutz)Nießer-Sicht - apt-get upgrade - ein gewaltiger Komplex von notwendiger Vorarbeit

Stable Updates zu DSA 815-1 (kdebase)

Gruesse! Ich habe gerade ein apt-get update angestoßen. Aufgrund o.a. DSA würden etliche KDE-Komponenten bzw. Anwendungen upgedatet werden, was ich ja nachvollziehen kann. Im changelog wird ja bei jedem Paket auf: [debian/patches/16_CAN-2005-2494_kcheckpass.diff] hingewiesen. Warum aber

Re: Stable Updates zu DSA 815-1 (kdebase)

* Gerhard Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050919 16:58]: Warum aber zusätzlich mein komplettes X nebst einiger anderer Libs aktualisiert werden soll, das verschließt sich meinem Verständnis. [..] Ein changelog zum Update gibt es auf dem Server nicht. Ein DSA IMHO auch nicht. Warum dieses Update?

Re: Stable Updates zu DSA 815-1 (kdebase)

Gruesse! * Alexander Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am [19.09.05 17:45]: * Gerhard Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050919 16:58]: Warum aber zusätzlich mein komplettes X nebst einiger anderer Libs aktualisiert werden soll, das verschließt sich meinem Verständnis. [..] Ein changelog zum

Re: Stable Updates zu DSA 815-1 (kdebase)

* Gerhard Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050919 18:14]: Das DSA 816 fuer das X-Update kommt noch. Ah danke! War also das Fix schneller als die Warnung ;-) Und aehh... laut .changes steht in den changelogs: = * Security update release. Resolves the following issue: + CAN-2005-2495:

Re: Stable Updates zu DSA 815-1 (kdebase)

Moinmoin, On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 06:14:45PM +0200, Gerhard Brauer wrote: * Alexander Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am [19.09.05 17:45]: * Gerhard Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050919 16:58]: Warum aber zusätzlich mein komplettes X nebst einiger anderer Libs aktualisiert werden soll,

Re: Stable Updates zu DSA 815-1 (kdebase)

Gruesse! * Alexander Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am [19.09.05 18:29]: * Gerhard Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050919 18:14]: Das DSA 816 fuer das X-Update kommt noch. Ah danke! War also das Fix schneller als die Warnung ;-) Und aehh... laut .changes steht in den changelogs: =

Re: Stable Updates zu DSA 815-1 (kdebase)

On Day 43 of Bureaucracy 3171, Gerhard Brauer wrote: * Alexander Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am [19.09.05 18:29]: Ja, aber beim Bauen wird doch in einzelne Pakete (xterm,xfonts,...) aufgesplittet. Warum stellt man jetzt nicht nur _das_ Paket nach updates/stable was auch wirklich den

Re: Stable Updates zu DSA 815-1 (kdebase)

On Day 43 of Bureaucracy 3171, Thomas Kosch wrote: Der in meinen Augen einzig sinnvolle Weg das zu lösen, ist der, den z.B SuSE geht. Die erstellen keine komletten Binär-Pakete sondern patch-rpms. Die Enhalten nur die Teile, die sich geändert haben (und Korrektur. Ab 9.2 benutzen die Delta

Re: Stable Updates zu DSA 815-1 (kdebase)

On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 07:34:18PM +0200, Gerhard Brauer wrote: Ich kann auch mein apt-dsl Skript anwerfen was mir für alle meine ^^^ Rechner eine Download-Liste erstellt mit der ich dann zum Kumpel gehe, der mit DSL/Flat gesegnet ist.

Re: Stable Updates zu DSA 815-1 (kdebase)

Alexander Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Das soll sich demnaechst mit Xorg aendern, weil Xorg modularisiert werden soll (oder ist's das schon?), und so das alles auf mehrere source Pakete verteilt wird. In 7.0 ist es soweit. 6.9 und 7.0 sind vom Code her identisch, nur 6.9 benutzt das alte

Re: Stable Updates zu DSA 815-1 (kdebase)

Gruesse! * Thomas Kosch [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am [19.09.05 20:30]: On Day 43 of Bureaucracy 3171, Gerhard Brauer wrote: Ja, aber beim Bauen wird doch in einzelne Pakete (xterm,xfonts,...) aufgesplittet. Warum stellt man jetzt nicht nur _das_ Paket nach updates/stable was auch wirklich

Re: Stable Updates zu DSA 815-1 (kdebase)

Gruesse! * Dirk Salva [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am [19.09.05 21:03]: On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 07:34:18PM +0200, Gerhard Brauer wrote: Ich kann auch mein apt-dsl Skript anwerfen was mir für alle meine Rechner eine Download-Liste erstellt mit der ich dann zum Kumpel gehe, der mit DSL/Flat

Re: Stable Updates zu DSA 815-1 (kdebase)

Gruesse! * Gerhard Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am [20.09.05 02:15]: Shit, Nachtrag; So gehe ich vor: a) apt-dsl.sh liegt bei mir auf einem nfs-share in einem eigenen Verzeichniss. Die Clients haben diesen share gemeountet. Für jeden upzudatenden Rechner gehe ich als root per ssh auf

apt-move stable[/-]updates problem

I've been using apt-move update to populate a local hierarchy for use by my other machines via nfs: deb file:/n/di/var/debian stable main contrib non-free deb file:/n/di/var/debian stable/updates main contrib non-free Since the sarge release, however, the security updates seem

Re: apt-move stable[/-]updates problem

W M Brelsford wrote: I've been using apt-move update to populate a local hierarchy for use by my other machines via nfs: deb file:/n/di/var/debian stable main contrib non-free deb file:/n/di/var/debian stable/updates main contrib non-free Since the sarge release, however

Re: apt-move stable[/-]updates problem

W M Brelsford wrote: I've been using apt-move update to populate a local hierarchy for use by my other machines via nfs: deb file:/n/di/var/debian stable main contrib non-free deb file:/n/di/var/debian stable/updates main contrib non-free Since the sarge release, however

Re: deb http://security.ebian.org/ stable updates

On Fri, Aug 13, 1999 at 02:23:34PM -0400, Wayne Topa wrote: I just tried it ththe the same line in my sources.list ie deb http://security.debian.org/ stable updates [it works] Maybe it was having a bad day when you tried it? Yeah, I was having a really bad day I guess. Now it is solved

Re: deb http://security.ebian.org/ stable updates

On Fri, Aug 13, 1999 at 12:14:39AM +0200, Thomas Keusch wrote: Hi! I just tried to incorporate http://security.debian.org into my apt sources.list once again - and it didn't work once again. Usually I don't reply to my own postings, but this was really a no-brainer which I don't want to

deb http://security.ebian.org/ stable updates

:~ $ grep ^deb /etc/apt/sources.list deb ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free deb ftp://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US stable non-US deb http://security.debian.org/ stable updates dante:~ $ dante:~ $ apt-get update Err http://security.debian.org stable/updates Packages Could

Re: deb http://security.ebian.org/ stable updates

* Thomas == Thomas Keusch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thomas dante:~ $ apt-get update Thomas Err http://security.debian.org stable/updates Packages Thomas Could not connect to security.debian.org (132.229.131.40). Looks like a network problem. Could you reach the site with a web browser? Ciao

Re: deb http://security.ebian.org/ stable updates

Subject: deb http://security.ebian.org/ stable updates Date: Fri, Aug 13, 1999 at 12:14:39AM +0200 In reply to:Thomas Keusch Quoting Thomas Keusch([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Hi! I just tried to incorporate http://security.debian.org into my apt sources.list once again

How to update stable with stable-updates

When I try to update stable using dselect and adding stable-updates to the distributions to get, dselect chooses m68-bin-files for the update instead of i386-files (most of the times). What is the right way to use the stable-updates-distribution with dselect? Thanx, Gernot

Re: How to update stable with stable-updates

On Sat, 22 Aug 1998, Gernot wrote: When I try to update stable using dselect and adding stable-updates to the distributions to get, dselect chooses m68-bin-files for the update instead of i386-files (most of the times). What is the right way to use the stable-updates-distribution with dselect

stable-updates?

What's the plan for files in the stable-updates directory on ftp.debian.org? Will these eventually be moved into the hamm distribution? I understand they're bug fixes for stable but why are they in a separate directoy instead of just replacing whatever's buggy in hamm/stable? Thanks, Gary

Updating the system using dselect-dists/stable-updates?

Hi, I've just tried to update my Hamm system (using the ftp method in dselect) by appending dists/stable-updates to the list of distributions (/dists/stable/main dists/stable/non-free dists/stable/contrib) to get. The result was that dselect also selected the m68k version of mutt, although my

apt-get to get stable-updates?

Hi, Can I use apt-get to go after the packages in the stable-updates directory at ftp.debian.org? If so, how? I could not find anything mentioned on the web pages or the apt docs. thanks, Stuart