On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 11:14:54AM -0600, Javier Vasquez wrote:
Have you tried not having your .xssesionrc at all? Does it provide
the same result to you as with .xsessionrc?
Yes, except for:
-8 .xsessionrc -8
/home/chrisb/background.sh
xterm -fn 10x20 -xrm
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 10:52:58AM -0600, Javier Vasquez wrote:
I use startx, and only have an .xsessionrc file. I know it is read
because of the xterm settings.
Resources, whether for xterm, urxvt, or similar, usually are not
configured into .xinitrc, neither .xsession (I never used
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Chris Bannister
cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 11:14:54AM -0600, Javier Vasquez wrote:
Have you tried not having your .xssesionrc at all? Does it provide
the same result to you as with .xsessionrc?
Yes, except for:
...
IOW, it
From: Chris Bannister cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 07:40:12 +1200
... it says .xsessionrc is read by .xsession, yet I have no .xsession file.
But from here:
root@tal:~# file /usr/bin/startx
/usr/bin/startx: POSIX shell script, ASCII text executable
which points to
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 10:52:58AM -0600, Javier Vasquez wrote:
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Chris Bannister
I use startx, and only have an .xsessionrc file. I know it is read
because of the xterm settings.
Resources, whether for xterm, urxvt, or similar, usually are not
configured
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Chris Bannister
cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote:
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 10:52:58AM -0600, Javier Vasquez wrote:
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Chris Bannister
I use startx, and only have an .xsessionrc file. I know it is read
because of the xterm
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Javier Vasquez
j.e.vasque...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Chris Bannister
cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote:
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 10:52:58AM -0600, Javier Vasquez wrote:
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Chris Bannister
I use startx,
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 01:31:51PM -0400, John L. Cunningham wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 09:20:02AM -0800, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote:
In the process of trying to make xmonad work I've found
that startx fails whereas xdm succeeds. The logs are here.
startx fails:
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Chris Bannister
cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 01:31:51PM -0400, John L. Cunningham wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 09:20:02AM -0800, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote:
In the process of trying to make xmonad work I've found
that startx fails
In the process of trying to make xmonad work I've found
that startx fails whereas xdm succeeds. The logs are here.
startx fails: http://carnot.yi.org/Xorg.0.log.old
xdm succeeds: http://carnot.yi.org/Xorg.0.log
My summary of the differences follows.
Any insights to direct further studies?
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 09:20:02AM -0800, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote:
In the process of trying to make xmonad work I've found
that startx fails whereas xdm succeeds. The logs are here.
startx fails: http://carnot.yi.org/Xorg.0.log.old
xdm succeeds: http://carnot.yi.org/Xorg.0.log
My summary
From: John L. Cunningham djoh...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 13:31:51 -0400
I would only note that startx and xdm don't necessarily look at the same
startup files. xdm looks for .xsession and startx looks for .xinitrc.
/home/peter/.xsession is non-existent and /home/peter/.xinitrc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 09:02:28PM +0200, Jon Haugsand wrote:
* Steve Lamb
Unless you are exceptionally tight on memory (which KDE suggests you're
not) I'd say just install kdm. It is based on xdm but you can configure it
nicely from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 09:36:31PM +0100, ian silvester wrote:
Okay, so I've installed kdm by:
apt-get install kdm
which all went smoothly, and has set kdm as my default display manager.
However, at the end of the boot process I see:
Hi,
I have a Woody install, using the 2.4.18bf24 kernel. I had been booting to
a console from which to login (I commented the entry in /etc/X11default-
display-manager to prevent the GUI auto-starting). I then used startx to
start a GUI. This quite happily booted KDE.
I now wish to auto-boot
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 18:17:54 +0100
Ian Silvester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the best way to make the runlevel-based X boot to go to KDE? Should
I tweak xdm's config (if so which file where?) or should I install kdm
instead via apt?
Unless you are exceptionally tight on memory
* Steve Lamb
Unless you are exceptionally tight on memory (which KDE suggests you're
not) I'd say just install kdm. It is based on xdm but you can configure it
nicely from within KDE itself.
Can you also do this from, say, fvwm?
--
Jon Haugsand
Dept. of Informatics, Univ. of Oslo,
On 17 Jul 2003 21:02:28 +0200
Jon Haugsand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you also do this from, say, fvwm?
Erm, technically yes since it is just a configuration option off the KDE
control panel. However kdm's configuration (/etc/kdex/kdm where x is the
version of KDE) is fairly
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 10:22:50 -0700, Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 18:17:54 +0100
Ian Silvester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the best way to make the runlevel-based X boot to go to KDE?
Should I tweak xdm's config (if so which file where?) or should I
install kdm
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 21:36:31 +0100
ian silvester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and yet the GUI does not boot? I've left gdm and xdm installed, but I don't
think they can get in the way - what am I missing folks?
What's on your 6th (or 7th) console? Any error messages?
--
Steve C.
20 matches
Mail list logo