El servidor esta bien, el lio es en el cliente
El 16/02/16 a las 21:39, Carlos Manuel Escalona Villeda escribió:
en el servidor debes tener instalado nfs-kernel-server
El mar., 16 de feb. de 2016 a la(s) 20:38, Alberto Cabrejas Pérez
>
En el equipo cliente en /mnt tienes montado correctamente el
FTP//var/storage/FTP pues algo ahí no se ve bien creo yo.
Saludos
--
Roberto Quiñones
Owner - Service Manager and System
ACShell.NET – Internet Services
robe...@acshell.net -
si, pruebo con otra pc con ubuntu por ejemplo y lo monta bien
El 17/02/16 a las 08:00, Roberto Quiñones escribió:
En el equipo cliente en /mnt tienes montado correctamente el
FTP//var/storage/FTP pues algo ahí no se ve bien creo yo.
Saludos
--
El 17 de febrero de 2016, 3:36, Alberto Cabrejas Pérez
escribió:
>
> tengo un servidor nfs en una pc funcional, estoy configurando un servidor con
> debian8 y al intentar utilizarlo como cliente nfs me devuelve: mount.nfs: No
> such device, el servidor nfs funciona bien,
Ante todo este cliente es físico o virtual ???
El 17/02/16 a las 08:23, fernando sainz escribió:
El 17 de febrero de 2016, 3:36, Alberto Cabrejas Pérez
escribió:
tengo un servidor nfs en una pc funcional, estoy configurando un servidor con
debian8 y al intentar
El Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:31:22 +0100, Luis Garcia Martin escribió:
Hola Luis, acuérdate de mandar los correos a la lista en formato texto en
lugar de html.
> Tengo un PC Medion i7, con GeForce GTX 760 y un adaptador USB TP-Link
> (que me funciona perfectamente con Kubuntu 15.10).
> Mi primera
El Tue, 16 Feb 2016 21:36:40 -0500, Alberto Cabrejas Pérez escribió:
(ese formato...)
> tengo un servidor nfs en una pc funcional, estoy configurando un
> servidor con debian8 y al intentar utilizarlo como cliente nfs me
> devuelve: */mount.nfs: No such device/*, el servidor nfs funciona bien,
>
El día 11 de febrero de 2016, 17:13, Camaleón escribió:
> El Thu, 11 Feb 2016 16:49:37 +0100, Maykel Franco escribió:
>
>> Buenas, me ha tocado una tarea de estas que te pide el cliente y que
>> consume recursos de las máquinas en producción pero bueno...
>
> (...)
>
>> He
Es posible crear una imagen del sistema y restaurarla en una maquina virtual
con virtualbox dentro del mismo sistema?
De ser posible que debo hacer?
Gracias y disculpen por las preguntas talvez tan simples para ustedes.
| ISMAEL |
ola.
Yo lo hice bastante tiempo, debes arrancar desde un cd con una Linux Live,
conectar un disco USB externo y utilizar DD (te recomiendo dd3c, viene en
la backtrack si mal no recuerdo y la ventaja que tienes que te va mostrando
el progreso). Haces la imagen en tu HD externo. Con esto tienes una
*Hola
**El comando recomendado era dc3dd
Se me olvidaba una ultima cosa, no he probado a hacer un redimensionado del
tamaño del HD (fué mi problema en ese caso).
Lo que hice, es una vez que hice la imagen de la particion:
1) Cree una maquina virtual y cree un disco con el nuevo tamaño deseado
2)
mas localhost, na própria máquina tem um sv web? Se sim, acho que o ideal
era um redirect 403.
*Rodrigo Germano de Paula*
Técnico em Tecnologia da Informação
IFB Campus Planaltina
Contato: (61) 21962601
Em 16 de fevereiro de 2016 22:43, Sinval Júnior
escreveu:
> Sim, sempre
Não é localhost. Essa máquina é ms$ com um aplicativo rodando em IS
proprietário. o http://www estaria em uma máquina apache ou nginx/debian.
Ao encaminhar esta mensagem, por favor:
1 - Apague meu endereço eletrônico;
2 - Encaminhe como Cópia Oculta (Cco ou BCc) aos seus destinatários.
Dificulte
On 16/02/16 11:40, Richard Lucassen wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 10:53:04 +0100
> Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 09:51:17PM +0100, Richard Lucassen wrote:
>>> discussies over gevoerd. Debian heeft gekozen voor systemd en
>>> alhoewel je nu nog sysv kunt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 04:45:16PM -0300, Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 18:02:52 +
> Joe wrote:
>
> > Ron was not completely clear here. Only the 'professional' versions of
> > Windows have the standard RDP
On Tue, 2016-02-16 at 10:47 -0300, Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
> In the days I used MS Windows, I had a suite of progs that allowed
> me, when run on both boxes, to see the desktop of one box in a window
> on the other, and mouse and keyboard actions in that window would act
> on the remote box.
>
> Is
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Jean-Baptiste Thomas
wrote:
> In bash, typing, say, "ls x*y" then tab lists all the possible
> expansions of "x*y" on the next line, then prints the command
> line anew with "x*y" replaced by longest common stem.
>
> With
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 09:57:30AM +0100, Anders Andersson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Jean-Baptiste Thomas
> wrote:
> > In bash, typing, say, "ls x*y" then tab lists all the possible
> > expansions of "x*y"
Le nonidi 29 pluviôse, an CCXXIV, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
> It can be creepily smart, like knowing the branches in your project
> when you do git checkout bla or things like that. Not bad.
You mean what zsh already did in its default distribution fifteen years ago?
And, of course, without
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:14:06AM +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le nonidi 29 pluviôse, an CCXXIV, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
> > It can be creepily smart, like knowing the branches in your project
> > when you do git checkout bla or things like
Hi, this may be a problem on the kernel level having nothing to do with
debian. Reason I write this is the computer I use has a ralink adapter
card attached to it which is wireless and it's talkingarch linux and I
have situations where sometimes the card gets loaded properly on
talkingarch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 07:02:07AM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> [...] In my .bashrc I put ping -c 5
> www.google.com|grep % to test if I have a network connection on
> reboot or power up [...]
Hint: ping tells you with an exit status of 0 that
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 15:51:58 +0800 Gener Badenas
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Ghaith Etaiwi
> wrote:
>
> > Hello, I'm starting in linux I used Ubuntu and didn't like it and I
> > have read that many people that used Debian
I have several remote Debian 7 servers and would like to secure it in
the following manner:
1. root will not be allowed any external access (access is only via a
user becoming root while logged in)
2. after initial setup, no ssh access will be allowed via a password
I have seen much
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 08:08:26AM -0600, Tom Browder wrote:
I have several remote Debian 7 servers and would like to secure it in
the following manner:
1. root will not be allowed any external access (access is only via a
user becoming root while logged in)
Ensure all users who may be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
The first requirement is simple. Add the line
PermitRootLogin no
or change it accordingly, and reload the SSH daemon.
For the second: do you want to disallow any logins via passwords, or
are the to be allowed once to set up the keys? The first
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 02:24:02PM +, Darac Marjal wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 08:08:26AM -0600, Tom Browder wrote:
> >I have several remote Debian 7 servers and would like to secure it in
> >the following manner:
> >
> >1. root will not be
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Peter Ludikovsky wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
...
Thanks, Peter. Do you agree with Darac's solution?
Best,
-Tom
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Darac Marjal wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 08:08:26AM -0600, Tom Browder wrote:
>>
>> I have several remote Debian 7 servers and would like to secure it in
>> the following manner:
...
I can follow that! Thanks so much, Darac.
Best,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
More or less. What I wouldn't agree with is locking the root account
completely, because, like Thomas said, you'll be locked out should you
ever be dropped to a rescue shell due to an hardware error.
Regards,
/peter
Am 17.02.2016 um 15:56 schrieb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 04:26:28PM +0100, Peter Ludikovsky wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> More or less. What I wouldn't agree with is locking the root account
> completely, because, like Thomas said, you'll be locked out
Setting SSH "PermitRoot no" and "PasswordAuthentication no" are good
starts... I'd also check that "ChallengeResponseAuthentication no" is
set as well as some PAM modules will utilize it and be able to get
around passwords being entered as well as "UsePAM no"
I do agree locking the root
Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
> I'm seeing a large number of entries in my /var/log/syslog that look
> like this:
> Feb 16 09:07:31 snowball auth: PAM unable to dlopen(pam_smbpass.so):
> /lib/security/pam_smbpass.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
> directory
>
Hi,
On 02/17/2016 05:11 PM, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
> Christian Seiler writes:
>> [Suggesting journalctl -o verbose to debug this]
> I'm running a current Debian testing installation, and journal is
> enabled.
>
> It turns out it's only coming from /usr/lib/dovecot/auth. What's
> weird is in
Seriously, when does bash-completion actually help someone on the
command line? The only time I notice it is when a pattern is buggy and
doesn't let me complete a filename even when it's completely valid.
It apparently doesn't do anything for you or me (but I'm a Korn shell
user), but I have
On Wednesday 17 February 2016 16:54:15 John L. Ries wrote:
> > Seriously, when does bash-completion actually help someone on the
> > command line? The only time I notice it is when a pattern is buggy and
> > doesn't let me complete a filename even when it's completely valid.
>
> It apparently
On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 20:48:30 +0100
"Thomas Schmitt scdbackup-at-gmx.net |Debian/Computer|"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> OS wrote:
> > Any time I do anything with apt-get, it ends with an error code
> > (1). It seems to have something to do with vim-tiny
>
> You did not show such
Hello,
I am using a laptop clevo W950JU with intel i5-6200U processor.
If I run jessie with the kernel 4.2.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 it works fine,
but when I use the kernel 4.3.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 X11 fails :
---8<---
[ 209.705] (--)
On Wed, February 17, 2016 1:13 pm, Chris wrote:
> is it possible to save 5000 folders in the same directory (ext4 FS)
> without any performance issues?
>
> It's a Maildir structure with a .-separator, e.g.
>
> /var/vmail/public/folder1
> /var/vmail/public/folder1.subfolder1a
>
On 2/17/2016 7:37 AM, Adam Wilson wrote:
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 15:51:58 +0800 Gener Badenas
wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Ghaith Etaiwi
wrote:
Hello, I'm starting in linux I used Ubuntu and didn't like it and I
have read that
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Jeremy T. Bouse
wrote:
> Setting SSH "PermitRoot no" and "PasswordAuthentication no" are good
> starts... I'd also check that "ChallengeResponseAuthentication no" is set as
> well as some PAM modules will utilize it and be able to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 08:13:23PM +0100, Chris wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> is it possible to save 5000 folders in the same directory (ext4 FS)
> without any performance issues?
I think ext3/ext4 should take that without problems. This is on my
netbook,
On 02/17/2016 11:13 AM, Chris wrote:
is it possible to save 5000 folders in the same directory (ext4 FS)
without any performance issues?
It's a Maildir structure with a .-separator, e.g.
/var/vmail/public/folder1
/var/vmail/public/folder1.subfolder1a
/var/vmail/public/folder1.subfolder1b
...
On 2/17/2016 3:31 PM, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Jeremy T. Bouse
> wrote:
>> Setting SSH "PermitRoot no" and "PasswordAuthentication no" are good
>> starts... I'd also check that "ChallengeResponseAuthentication no" is set as
>> well as
On Wed 17 Feb 2016 at 14:07:30 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 2/17/2016 7:37 AM, Adam Wilson wrote:
> >On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 15:51:58 +0800 Gener Badenas
> > wrote:
> >
> >>On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Ghaith Etaiwi
> >> wrote:
> >>
>
On 2/17/2016 5:34 PM, David Wright wrote:
On Wed 17 Feb 2016 at 14:07:30 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote:
[snip]
Depends on what you consider to be 'fast'. Is 120K/s fast?
This laptop has 2255 packages on it, the total download size of which
is about 3GB. At a throughput of 120KB/s, that'd be
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Jeremy T. Bouse
wrote:
> On 2/17/2016 3:31 PM, Tom Browder wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Jeremy T. Bouse
>> wrote:
...
>>> I do agree locking the root password isn't advisable. As I use
>>>
Christian Seiler writes:
> Hi,
>
> On 02/17/2016 05:11 PM, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
>> Christian Seiler writes:
>>> [Suggesting journalctl -o verbose to debug this]
>> I'm running a current Debian testing installation, and journal is
>> enabled.
>>
>> It turns out it's only
Sven Hartge writes:
> Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
>
>> I'm seeing a large number of entries in my /var/log/syslog that look
>> like this:
>
>> Feb 16 09:07:31 snowball auth: PAM unable to dlopen(pam_smbpass.so):
>> /lib/security/pam_smbpass.so: cannot open
On Wed 17 Feb 2016 at 18:09:03 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 2/17/2016 5:34 PM, David Wright wrote:
> >On Wed 17 Feb 2016 at 14:07:30 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote:
> >>[snip]
> >>>Depends on what you consider to be 'fast'. Is 120K/s fast?
> >
> >This laptop has 2255 packages on it, the
On 2016-02-17 at 12:43, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 February 2016 16:54:15 John L. Ries wrote:
>
>>> Seriously, when does bash-completion actually help someone on
>>> the command line? The only time I notice it is when a pattern is
>>> buggy and doesn't let me complete a filename even
Dear customer,
A raise is important, since you have to beat your competitor and
improve the rank of your website.
Then how do you boost your website without paying big ?
There are six ways .
Our expert need your web url , please send it now .
Office number: .:+
Le 14/02/2016 20:03, Gilles Mocellin a écrit :
Le 14/02/2016 17:23, Marc a écrit :
Bonjour ! Je me permets de rebondir avec un petit cavalier hors sujet
Est-il possible de créer une entrée grub qui lance un bon vieux DOS ?
Qui charge par exemple un fichier disquette.img placé dans une
Le 17/02/2016 10:52, Marc a écrit :
La question est : pourquoi je n'ai pas trouvé l'information plus tôt
ailleurs ? Et ce petit échange risque de ne pas être bien indexé par les
moteurs de recherche, puisque cavalier mal placé...
On 02/16/2016 11:57 PM, François TOURDE wrote:
Le 16847ième jour après Epoch,
mader...@gmail.com écrivait:
D'après mon expérience d'utilisateur, on peut utiliser "Testing" pour
tester mais certainement pas dans le cadre d'une utilisation "normale"
et sécurisée.
En fait, c'est ça qui me gêne
bonjour,
voici la nouvelle rédigée par un co-listier :
https://linuxfr.org/users/bortzmeyer/journaux/faille-de-securite-dans-le-gnu-libc-avec-les-requetes-dns
bonne lecture
slt
bernard
Le 17 février 2016 à 14:49, maderios a écrit :
>
> normale= courante, toute utilisation sauf le serveur.
> tester= rien que tester...
bonjour,
et dans ce contexte où placeriez vous un poste de travail individuel?
Certes les pertes de fonctionnalités sur serveur amènent à des
Le 17/02/2016 10:52, Marc a écrit :
Le 14/02/2016 20:03, Gilles Mocellin a écrit :
Le 14/02/2016 17:23, Marc a écrit :
Bonjour ! Je me permets de rebondir avec un petit cavalier hors sujet
Est-il possible de créer une entrée grub qui lance un bon vieux DOS
? Qui charge par exemple un
Comme je le dit plus tot, tout est dit et son contraire aussi. C'est un
peu comme apt et aptitude, un jour ça va etre l'un et puis un autre
jour, ça sera l'autre. Ce que je vois, et ce qui est dit c'est que sous
testing a cause des dependance et de la qualité, a tout moment un paquet
peut
Bonjour,
Cela fait des années que j'utilise et bidouille linux a un petit, petit
niveau. J'ai jamais compris pourquoi certaines personnes ecrivent sur linux
sur leur blog ou wiki et pas sur le wiki de la distribution.
Du coup, Je me permets une suggestion: si tu te decided a ecrire oourquoi
ne
Bonjour,
Le mardi 16 février 2016, sechanb...@free.fr a écrit...
> ok, j'ai déposé le fichier à l'endroit indiqué, après j'imagine qu'il
> faut changer quelque chose à la configuration pour que le server y
> accède ?
Ça devrait suffire pour permettre le "déploiement" de l'archive .war.
"Pour information, la mise à jour est passée dans Debian stable et sid.
Les versions de la glibc qui contiennent la correction de bug, et donc
qui ne sont pas affectées par la vulnérabilité sont les suivantes:
Stable: 2.19-18+deb8u3
Sid: 2.21-8
Vous pouvez utiliser dpkg -l libc-bin pour
On 17/02/2016 22:58, merkeda...@vmail.me wrote:
> "Pour information, la mise à jour est passée dans Debian stable et sid.
De manière plus générale, les alertes sont ici:
https://www.debian.org/security/2016
--
Fabien
63 matches
Mail list logo