On Lu, 27 aug 12, 21:47:08, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
I often build vanilla + patch-rt. Usually I copy the Debian's default
kernel config, change some settings to fit to rt needs and then run
make oldconfig.
Have you tried the new rt flavour of Debian kernels?
$ uname -a
Linux think
On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 09:41 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Lu, 27 aug 12, 21:47:08, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
I often build vanilla + patch-rt. Usually I copy the Debian's default
kernel config, change some settings to fit to rt needs and then run
make oldconfig.
Have you tried the new rt
On 8/26/2012 6:39 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
Experimental kernels are probably better than downloading the source
from kernel.org and compiling it.
I disagree. I've been running late model vanilla kernels with Stable
for many years without issue. Currently I'm running vanilla 3.2.6
w/Squeeze since
On 8/26/2012 7:44 PM, Alex Robbins wrote:
need something more recent than testing
Why? IIRC you previously mentioned you *needed* 3.3 or higher. Can you
tell use what feature it is you need that was introduced in 3.3?
not asking which of the above options is stable and secure (I know it
is
On 27.8.2012 6:32, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
That will get him the latest kernel for his particular distribution
(testing, wheezy, etc). The current kernel for either testing or
unstable is 3.2; the current for experimental is 3.4; the current at
kernel.org is 3.5.
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 16:51:54 -0500, Alex Robbins wrote:
I am running Debian testing, which currently has kernel 3.2.23-1, same
as unstable. experimental has 3.5.something. I am looking to run
kernel version 3.3 or higher.
As I understand it, there are 2 ways to go about this. I could
Pertti Kosunen pertti.kosu...@pp.nic.fi writes:
On 27.8.2012 6:32, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
That will get him the latest kernel for his particular distribution
(testing, wheezy, etc). The current kernel for either testing or
unstable is 3.2; the current for experimental is 3.4; the current at
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 01:25:11 -0500
Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
On 8/26/2012 7:44 PM, Alex Robbins wrote:
need something more recent than testing
Why? IIRC you previously mentioned you *needed* 3.3 or higher. Can you
tell use what feature it is you need that was
On 08/27/2012 08:45 AM, Camaleón wrote:
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 16:51:54 -0500, Alex Robbins wrote:
I am running Debian testing, which currently has kernel 3.2.23-1, same
as unstable. experimental has 3.5.something. I am looking to run
kernel version 3.3 or higher.
As I understand it, there are
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 19:39:42 -0400
Gary Dale garyd...@rogers.com wrote:
...
Experimental kernels are probably better than downloading the source
from kernel.org and compiling it. At least some attempt is made to make
it work in the Debian ecosystem.
As Stan points out in another message in
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 01:04:39 -0500
Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
On 8/26/2012 6:39 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
Experimental kernels are probably better than downloading the source
from kernel.org and compiling it.
I disagree. I've been running late model vanilla kernels with
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 15:31 -0400, Celejar wrote:
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 19:39:42 -0400
Gary Dale garyd...@rogers.com wrote:
...
Experimental kernels are probably better than downloading the source
from kernel.org and compiling it. At least some attempt is made to make
it work in the
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 15:38 -0400, Celejar wrote:
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 01:04:39 -0500
Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
On 8/26/2012 6:39 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
Experimental kernels are probably better than downloading the source
from kernel.org and compiling it.
I
I am running Debian testing, which currently has kernel 3.2.23-1, same
as unstable. experimental has 3.5.something. I am looking to run
kernel version 3.3 or higher.
As I understand it, there are 2 ways to go about this. I could build
from the kernel.org source, or I could install from
On 26/08/12 05:51 PM, Alex Robbins wrote:
I am running Debian testing, which currently has kernel 3.2.23-1, same
as unstable. experimental has 3.5.something. I am looking to run
kernel version 3.3 or higher.
As I understand it, there are 2 ways to go about this. I could build
from the
On 08/26/2012 06:39 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
I'm confused. You said that unstable has the same version as testing,
so installing from SID wouldn't get you anything.
You're right, it wouldn't. I misspoke. I meant to say, or I could
install
from *experimental*
If you are looking for stability and
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 00:00:01 +0200
Alex Robbins alexdotrobb...@gmail.com wrote:
As I understand it, there are 2 ways to go about this. I could build
from the kernel.org source, or I could install from unstable.
or you could install:
linux-headers-amd64
linux-image-amd64
this would insure
On 08/26/2012 09:48 PM, Charles Kroeger wrote:
or you could install: linux-headers-amd64 linux-image-amd64 this would
insure you always had the latest kernel and headers. Your architecture
may be different so you might want to look to that in regard to my
examples.
This does not at all answer
On Monday 27,August,2012 11:13 AM, Alex Robbins wrote:
On 08/26/2012 09:48 PM, Charles Kroeger wrote:
or you could install: linux-headers-amd64 linux-image-amd64 this would
insure you always had the latest kernel and headers. Your architecture
may be different so you might want to look to that
On 27/08/12 05:30, lina wrote:
On Monday 27,August,2012 11:13 AM, Alex Robbins wrote:
On 08/26/2012 09:48 PM, Charles Kroeger wrote:
or you could install: linux-headers-amd64 linux-image-amd64 this would
insure you always had the latest kernel and headers. Your architecture
may be different
Charles Kroeger ckro...@frankensteinface.com writes:
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 00:00:01 +0200
Alex Robbins alexdotrobb...@gmail.com wrote:
As I understand it, there are 2 ways to go about this. I could build
from the kernel.org source, or I could install from unstable.
or you could install:
Charles Kroeger ckro...@frankensteinface.com writes:
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 00:00:01 +0200
Alex Robbins alexdotrobb...@gmail.com wrote:
As I understand it, there are 2 ways to go about this. I could build
from the kernel.org source, or I could install from unstable.
or you could install:
22 matches
Mail list logo
