Re: tntnet

2013-08-02 Thread ChadDavis
Unless you've already removed it, you can still check the configuration file, find the files/apps it was serving, and get a good guess at the contents, enough to decide whether you want to start the server back up to look. Or whether you might want to take other measures to make sure that

Re: tntnet

2013-08-01 Thread ChadDavis
And synaptic knowing about tntnet was somewhat reassuring, because it does indicate a high probability that it was installed by someone with admin-level priviledges. Bad if it wasn't you, of course, but not bad if you're sure no one not you has been logging in as you. Did you check what

Re: tntnet

2013-08-01 Thread Joel Rees
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 7:08 AM, ChadDavis chadmichaelda...@gmail.comwrote: And synaptic knowing about tntnet was somewhat reassuring, because it does indicate a high probability that it was installed by someone with admin-level priviledges. Bad if it wasn't you, of course, but not bad

Re: tntnet

2013-07-31 Thread ChadDavis
When I try to remove it via synaptic, it reports that, in addition to the tntnet packages, another unchanged package will be held back and not upgraded . . . that other package is google-chrome-stable. I couldn't quite figure out why it's there though. It's not listed as a dependencie

Re: tntnet

2013-07-31 Thread Erwan David
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 04:55:48PM CEST, ChadDavis chadmichaelda...@gmail.com said: When I try to remove it via synaptic, it reports that, in addition to the tntnet packages, another unchanged package will be held back and not upgraded . . . that other package is google-chrome-stable. I

Re: tntnet

2013-07-31 Thread ChadDavis
It means synaptic knows of a newer version of google-chrome-stable, but since you specifically asked for removal of tntnet it won't touch it. Nothing to worry about. So, there's no connection between chrome and tntnet, it's just pointing out that while I'm doing stuff, there's this other

Re: tntnet

2013-07-31 Thread Sharon Kimble
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Wed, 31 Jul 2013 09:04:59 -0600 ChadDavis chadmichaelda...@gmail.com wrote: It means synaptic knows of a newer version of google-chrome-stable, but since you specifically asked for removal of tntnet it won't touch it. Nothing to worry

Re: tntnet

2013-07-31 Thread davidson
hi brian. On Wed, 31 Jul 2013, Brian wrote: On Tue 30 Jul 2013 at 14:55:41 -0600, ChadDavis wrote: I've noticed the tntnet is running on my box. I'm on wheezy. I'd like to turn it off, at the least. But I wonder why it's fired up in the first place. I didn't install it, unless

Re: tntnet

2013-07-31 Thread Brian
On Wed 31 Jul 2013 at 17:51:28 -0400, david...@ling.ohio-state.edu wrote: On Wed, 31 Jul 2013, Brian wrote: Rough and ready, but effective: apt-cache -s purge tntnet i assume you mean apt-get -s purge tntnet which purges nothing, but displays what would happen if you were

Re: tntnet

2013-07-31 Thread Joel Rees
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:04 AM, ChadDavis chadmichaelda...@gmail.comwrote: It means synaptic knows of a newer version of google-chrome-stable, but since you specifically asked for removal of tntnet it won't touch it. Nothing to worry about. So, there's no connection between chrome

Re: tntnet

2013-07-31 Thread Erwan David
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 05:04:59PM CEST, ChadDavis chadmichaelda...@gmail.com said: It means synaptic knows of a newer version of google-chrome-stable, but since you specifically asked for removal of tntnet it won't touch it. Nothing to worry about. So, there's no connection

tntnet

2013-07-30 Thread ChadDavis
I've noticed the tntnet is running on my box. I'm on wheezy. I'd like to turn it off, at the least. But I wonder why it's fired up in the first place. I didn't install it, unless by accident. How might I determine if something else is using it? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ

Re: tntnet

2013-07-30 Thread Wayne Topa
On 07/30/2013 04:55 PM, ChadDavis wrote: I've noticed the tntnet is running on my box. I'm on wheezy. I'd like to turn it off, at the least. But I wonder why it's fired up in the first place. I didn't install it, unless by accident. How might I determine if something else is using

Re: tntnet

2013-07-30 Thread Brad Alexander
It could be tntnet: # apt-cache search tntnet tntnet - modular, multithreaded web application server for C++ Having said that, while I am not a developer, I have never run tntnet on any of my boxes. --b On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Wayne Topa linux...@gmail.com wrote: On 07/30/2013 04

Re: tntnet

2013-07-30 Thread Joel Rees
Hmm. Guerilla marketing? Wish I had time to check it out. Looks kinda fun. On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:55 AM, ChadDavis chadmichaelda...@gmail.comwrote: I've noticed the tntnet is running on my box. I'm on wheezy. I'd like to turn it off, at the least. But I wonder why it's fired up

Fwd: Re: tntnet

2013-07-30 Thread Wayne Topa
of a tntnet package but now the are both working. Thanks Brian you helped Chad an me as well with your answer. Well done Sir -- Wayne ---BeginMessage--- It could be tntnet: # apt-cache search tntnet tntnet - modular, multithreaded web application server for C++ Having said that, while I am

Re: tntnet

2013-07-30 Thread Brian
On Tue 30 Jul 2013 at 14:55:41 -0600, ChadDavis wrote: I've noticed the tntnet is running on my box. I'm on wheezy. I'd like to turn it off, at the least. But I wonder why it's fired up in the first place. I didn't install it, unless by accident. How might I determine if something else