I needed to re-install my Debian system due to a disk failure. (Used
to be etch, now lenny.) I have
a new primary IDE master to which I installed, and I also have an
IT8212 IDE card in the machine. For some reason when booting, the
IT8212 gets assigned the /dev/hda-hdd, while the onboard
I needed to re-install my Debian system due to a disk failure. (Used
to be etch, now lenny.) I have
a new primary IDE master to which I installed, and I also have an
IT8212 IDE card in the machine. For some reason when booting, the
IT8212 gets assigned the /dev/hda-hdd, while the onboard
In the meantime I actually found a reference to this problem in the
release notes for etch. I haven't tried yet, but it should fix the
problem.
Here:
http://www.us.debian.org/releases/etch/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html#s-device-reorder
I've been using etch for some time, I wonder why
I'm running a Debian lenny box. I would like to set up a Hauppauge
PVR-350's video out as an X server, however, I can't seem to find the
ivti-fb module in Debian. (the card is otherwise working nicely with
the ivtv module). Has someone had some luck with this?
Tc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
I have two lenny boxes, and I want to login to an X session on one of
them from the other using XDMCP. If I run KDM on the remote machine
and try to log in, KDM just restarts. If I run XDM on the same
machine, I can login in through XDMCP. I can also log in with KDM
locally on the remote machine.
On márc. 27, 13:50, Towncat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have two lenny boxes, and I want to login to an X session on one of
them from the other usingXDMCP. If I runKDMon the remote machine
and try to log in,KDMjust restarts. If I run XDM on the same
machine, I can login in throughXDMCP. I can
I am using lenny, and did an upgrade lately. Since that I am getting a
message repeatedly both on console and in /var/log/messages:
ppdev0: registered pardevice
What happened?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As just said in a previous post, I am using lenny and lately upgraded
it. Firefox/Iceweasel fails to start since then:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ firefox
/usr/lib/iceweasel/firefox-bin: Symbol `SSL_ImplementedCiphers' has
different size in shared object, consider re-linking
(gecko:14849):
On dec. 31, 00:30, Florian Kulzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 03:46:02 -0800, Towncat wrote:
As just said in a previous post, I am using lenny and lately upgraded
it. Firefox/Iceweasel fails to start since then:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ firefox
/usr/lib/iceweasel/firefox
On dec. 31, 02:10, Towncat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On dec. 31, 00:30, Florian Kulzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 03:46:02 -0800, Towncat wrote:
As just said in a previous post, I am using lenny and lately upgraded
it. Firefox/Iceweasel fails to start since
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 02:31:47 -0800, Towncat wrote:
[...]
OK, now iceweasel runs, but I realised that there is more to it,
something to do with fonts and pango. When I start non-kde
applications under kde, I get little squares instead of fonts.
The output
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 02:31:47 -0800, Towncat wrote:
[...]
OK, now iceweasel runs, but I realised that there is more to it,
something to do with fonts and pango. When I start non-kde
applications under kde, I get little squares instead of fonts.
The output
I'm trying to make a bootable backup disk based on a href=http://
linuxgazette.net/140/kapil.htmlthis howto/a.
The backup is on an external usb-sata drive. There is an sdc1
partition that is not used, a small sdc2 for boot, unencrypted, and an
sdc3 encrypted. On this there is a volume group, with
On Jan 1, 11:00 pm, Towncat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to make a bootable backup disk based on a href=http://
linuxgazette.net/140/kapil.htmlthis howto/a.
The backup is on an external usb-sata drive. There is an sdc1
partition that is not used, a small sdc2 for boot, unencrypted
On Jan 2, 6:50 pm, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 08:29:30AM -0800, Towncat wrote:
On Jan 1, 11:00 pm, Towncat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to make a bootable backup disk based on a href=http://
linuxgazette.net/140/kapil.htmlthis howto
On Jan 2, 8:30 pm, Towncat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 2, 6:50 pm, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 08:29:30AM -0800, Towncat wrote:
On Jan 1, 11:00 pm, Towncat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to make a bootable backup disk based on a href=http
I'm trying to deactivate a logical volume and the volume group it is
inside, but I get this error message (not exactly, I'm writing this
from memory). The point is, that the system thinks the swap partition
is in use. However, this is not the swap the system is using (that's
on another partition),
On Jan 7, 10:00 am, Towncat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to deactivate a logical volume and the volume group it is
inside, but I get this error message (not exactly, I'm writing this
from memory). The point is, that the system thinks the swap partition
is in use. However
On jan. 7, 17:20, Towncat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 7, 10:00 am, Towncat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to deactivate a logical volume and the volume group it is
inside, but I get this error message (not exactly, I'm writing this
from memory). The point is, that the system
Hi,
I did a
/sbin/badblocks -c 10240 -w -t random -v /dev/sda2
where sda2 is a 320 gb partition. The process has been running for
approx 18 hours and is just over three thirds. Is this really supposed
to be so slow, or is there something wrong? The machine is a Core Duo
1,6, 2GB memory.
Tc
On jan. 12, 19:20, Michael Shuler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01/12/2008 11:40 AM, Towncat wrote:
/sbin/badblocks -c 10240 -w -t random -v /dev/sda2
where sda2 is a 320 gb partition. The process has been running for
approx 18 hours and is just over three thirds. Is this really supposed
On jan. 12, 22:20, Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01/12/08 11:40, Towncat wrote:
Hi,
I did a
/sbin/badblocks -c 10240 -w -t random -v /dev/sda2
Why? Don't you trust brand new disk drives?
Well, you do have a point... But then, this is the only time I can do
this safely. When
On jan. 18, 21:40, Towncat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On jan. 12, 22:20, Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01/12/08 11:40, Towncat wrote:
Hi,
I did a
/sbin/badblocks -c 10240 -w -t random -v /dev/sda2
Why? Don't you trust brand new disk drives?
Well, you do have a point
23 matches
Mail list logo
