Re: artsd, scsi me

2002-06-18 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
On Thu, 2002-06-13 at 17:16, Jamin W.Collins wrote:

 Very strange.  Don't know why you'd be getting an error for a device that
 isn't attached.

scsi0 and scsi1 refer to the controllers, methinks. Very unlikely he
removed controllers.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: artsd, scsi me

2002-06-18 Thread Anthony DeRobertis


On Tuesday, June 18, 2002, at 02:20 , G. L. `Griz' Inabnit wrote:


No. The AIC-7xxx is built onto the motherboard.


Well, that would qualify for 'very unlikely'. Have you tried 
reseting the controller in the Adaptec BIOS? That has fixed most 
AIC-7xxx issues I've had.


I also notice you didn't mention different cables and 
terminators. Have you tried those?


PS: Please remember to keep the list in the cc field.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: artsd, scsi me

2002-06-13 Thread Jamin W . Collins
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002 12:08:25 -0700
G. L. `Griz' Inabnit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 internal
   Western Digital WDE18310 Ultra3
   TDK CDRW8432 CD-RW (ide {idescsi emu})
   Creative DVD 8400E (ide {idescsi emu})
   IO Mega Zip 100 (ide {idescsi emu})
   IO Mega 2 gig Jazz (scsi)
(snip)
 scsi1: PCI error Interrupt at seqaddr = 0x9
 scsi1: Data Parity Error Detected during address or write data phase
 scsi0: PCI error Interrupt at seqaddr = 0x8
 scsi0: Data Parity Error Detected during address or write data phase

You got media in the Jaz drive during this?  According to my
interpretation of your dmesg output, scsi0 is your WDE18310 ULTRA3 and
scsi1 is your jaz.  

Have you tried another drive (preferrablly IDE) for the OS?

 Thinking it was caused by something connected to the scsi
 channels, I removed them all with the exception of the O/S drive. No
 changes. 

I'm assuming the above output was done with the other drives attached and
the actual output did change when the extra devices were removed (as there
would not have been a scsi1 at that time).

-- 
Jamin W. Collins


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: artsd, scsi me

2002-06-13 Thread G. L. `Griz' Inabnit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Thursday 13 June 2002 12:19 pm, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
 On Thu, 13 Jun 2002 12:08:25 -0700

 G. L. `Griz' Inabnit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  internal
  Western Digital WDE18310 Ultra3
  TDK CDRW8432 CD-RW (ide {idescsi emu})
  Creative DVD 8400E (ide {idescsi emu})
  IO Mega Zip 100 (ide {idescsi emu})
  IO Mega 2 gig Jazz (scsi)

 (snip)

  scsi1: PCI error Interrupt at seqaddr = 0x9
  scsi1: Data Parity Error Detected during address or write data phase
  scsi0: PCI error Interrupt at seqaddr = 0x8
  scsi0: Data Parity Error Detected during address or write data phase

 You got media in the Jaz drive during this?  According to my
 interpretation of your dmesg output, scsi0 is your WDE18310 ULTRA3 and
 scsi1 is your jaz.

Yes.


 Have you tried another drive (preferrablly IDE) for the OS?

No.


  Thinking it was caused by something connected to the scsi
  channels, I removed them all with the exception of the O/S drive. No
  changes.

 I'm assuming the above output was done with the other drives attached and
 the actual output did change when the extra devices were removed (as there
 would not have been a scsi1 at that time).

No. The output remains the same. With or without the other drives 
attached.

- --
__
   OutCast Computer Consultants of Central Oregon
 http://outcast-consultants.redmond.or.us
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  (541) 504-1388  /\IRC: 205.227.115.251:6667:#OutCasts /\ICQ: UIN 138930





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: artsd, scsi me

2002-06-13 Thread Jamin W . Collins
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002 13:14:35 -0700
G. L. `Griz' Inabnit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Have you tried another drive (preferrablly IDE) for the OS?
 
   No.

I would highly recommend you try this.  The errors that are listed are
obviously SCSI.  However, this doesn't mean that they are the cause.  By
eliminating them you'll find out.

  I'm assuming the above output was done with the other drives attached
  and the actual output did change when the extra devices were removed
  (as there would not have been a scsi1 at that time).
 
   No. The output remains the same. With or without the other drives
   attached.

Very strange.  Don't know why you'd be getting an error for a device that
isn't attached.

-- 
Jamin W. Collins


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]