Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal

2000-07-05 Thread Joey Hess
Craig Sanders wrote: the facts do support what i say. the debian constitution states what documents may be created or modified by vote, yet fails to mention that either the social contract or the DFSG may be so modified. what this means is that you can't call for a vote to change either of

Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal

2000-07-05 Thread Steve Greenland
On 05-Jul-00, 16:54 (CDT), Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Craig Sanders wrote: the facts do support what i say. the debian constitution states what documents may be created or modified by vote, yet fails to mention that either the social contract or the DFSG may be so modified.

Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal

2000-07-05 Thread Adam Heath
On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Steve Greenland wrote: However: 4. The Developers by way of General Resolution or election 4.1. Powers Together, the Developers may: [**snip**] 5.Issue nontechnical policy documents and

Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal

2000-07-05 Thread Joey Hess
Adam Heath wrote: Issue, but doesn't say a thing about modifying preexisting documents and statements. So we issue DFSG v2, a new document that just happens to include the text of DFSG v1 verbatim, except for oner paragraph. This is the same as the old Who does Debian Admin answer to? thread.

Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal

2000-07-05 Thread Craig Sanders
On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 05:56:37PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Steve Greenland wrote: 5.Issue nontechnical policy documents and statements. Issue, but doesn't say a thing about modifying preexisting documents and statements. precisely. if we end up deciding that these