Re: Questions for candidates -- Debian's Organizational Structure

2004-03-04 Thread Branden Robinson
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 07:49:10AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: Out of curiosity, do you plan to only formally make the people working in these departments delegates? I plan to extend formal delegate status to everyone currently serving in those roles. It is possible that one or more of those

Re: Questions for candidates -- Debian's Organizational Structure

2004-03-04 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-04 06:47]: I wonder why reviving the CTTE has to wait until you become the project leader. The Debian Project Leader is empowered by clause 5.1.6 of the Debian Constitution[2] to seat and remove members of the Technical Committee. The

Re: Questions for candidates -- Debian's Organizational Structure

2004-03-04 Thread Martin Schulze
Branden Robinson wrote: I think the following roles should be formally delegated: FTP Archives Release Manager Release Manager for stable Bug Tracking System Mailing Lists Administration Mailing Lists Archives New Maintainers Front

Re: Questions for candidates -- Debian's Organizational Structure

2004-03-04 Thread Branden Robinson
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 07:49:10AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: Out of curiosity, do you plan to only formally make the people working in these departments delegates? I plan to extend formal delegate status to everyone currently serving in those roles. It is possible that one or more of those

Re: Questions for candidates -- Debian's Organizational Structure

2004-03-03 Thread Gergely Nagy
Which of the groups/people on [1] do you consider delegates? Why or why not? Would you change this? None of them, because none includes my tama, who is an aspiring conqueror, a wanna-be ruler of the world (who wants to start with Debian for some strange reason... maybe because Debian is the

Re: Questions for candidates -- Debian's Organizational Structure

2004-03-03 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-03 16:48]: Which of the groups/people on [1] do you consider delegates? Why or why not? Would you change this? Before answering this mail, I talked to Pasc on IRC for a while. Pasc was added as a listmaster during my term as DPL, and has done

Re: Questions for candidates -- Debian's Organizational Structure

2004-03-03 Thread Raul Miller
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 06:16:20PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: No, I am extremely disappointed with the role of the Technical Committee. I actually talked to Peter Palfrader [EMAIL PROTECTED] about this at FOSDEM two weeks ago. While I think that we should in most cases come to a

Re: Questions for candidates -- Debian's Organizational Structure

2004-03-03 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 04:48:01PM +1100, Pascal Hakim wrote: Hi, Which of the groups/people on [1] do you consider delegates? Why or why not? Formally speaking, I guess only two are. The Release Manager, and the Hardware Donations Manager. Martin can probably tell us if he's made other

Re: Questions for candidates -- Debian's Organizational Structure

2004-03-03 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Bob Hilliard [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-03 17:53]: However, as far as I recall, no DPL has ever publicly appointed delegates to positions. http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200305/msg5.html -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To

Re: Questions for candidates -- Debian's Organizational Structure

2004-03-03 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-03 16:48]: Which of the groups/people on [1] do you consider delegates? Why or why not? Would you change this? Before answering this mail, I talked to Pasc on IRC for a while. Pasc was added as a listmaster during my term as DPL, and has done

Re: Questions for candidates -- Debian's Organizational Structure

2004-03-03 Thread Raul Miller
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 06:16:20PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: No, I am extremely disappointed with the role of the Technical Committee. I actually talked to Peter Palfrader [EMAIL PROTECTED] about this at FOSDEM two weeks ago. While I think that we should in most cases come to a

Re: Questions for candidates -- Debian's Organizational Structure

2004-03-03 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 04:48:01PM +1100, Pascal Hakim wrote: Hi, Which of the groups/people on [1] do you consider delegates? Why or why not? Formally speaking, I guess only two are. The Release Manager, and the Hardware Donations Manager. Martin can probably tell us if he's made other

Re: Questions for candidates -- Debian's Organizational Structure

2004-03-03 Thread Bob Hilliard
Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, Which of the groups/people on [1] do you consider delegates? Why or why not? Would you change this? Since I am not a candidate, I cannot answer the question as asked. However, I can add a data point. When the draft constitution was first

Re: Questions for candidates -- Debian's Organizational Structure

2004-03-03 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Bob Hilliard [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-03 17:53]: However, as far as I recall, no DPL has ever publicly appointed delegates to positions. http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200305/msg5.html -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Questions for candidates -- Debian's Organizational Structure

2004-03-02 Thread Pascal Hakim
Hi, Which of the groups/people on [1] do you consider delegates? Why or why not? Would you change this? Do you believe the Tech Committee is effective in its role for the project? Cheers, Pasc [1]: http://www.debian.org/intro/organization -- Pascal Hakim

Questions for candidates -- Debian's Organizational Structure

2004-03-02 Thread Pascal Hakim
Hi, Which of the groups/people on [1] do you consider delegates? Why or why not? Would you change this? Do you believe the Tech Committee is effective in its role for the project? Cheers, Pasc [1]: http://www.debian.org/intro/organization -- Pascal Hakim