Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish list reminder... :-)

2003-05-29 Thread David Sullivan
Does anyone that doesn't agree with Bill have any suggestions? We've got an Imail server on a Dell box (2650 2.2 Xeon, RAID 1/5, etc) doing about 150,000 messages a day at roughly 45% utilization and climbing. Looking at all the headaches of managing another box along with duplicate purchases of

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish list reminder... :-)

2003-05-29 Thread IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge)
This is precisely what we do, although not to the tune of 150k messages a day. Imail and Declude make an AWESOME gateway mail server. Only when external contact is required ( in or out ) do we actually have to touch the Imail/declude box. Our internal Exchange server isn't bothered with all the

[Declude.JunkMail] Alert Emails

2003-05-29 Thread Robert Forsyth
To send an alert email to multiple recipients, the syntax is: To: %MAILFROM%, [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Courtesy Email From %LOCALHOST% If this is correct, I get the [EMAIL PROTECTED] emails for monitoring purposes with no problem, but the %MAILFROM% never gets the

[Declude.JunkMail] IMail Expres Lite

2003-05-29 Thread Doug McKee
The free version of IMail is for one domain. Can it be used with JM and Virus? Doug --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Alert Emails

2003-05-29 Thread R. Scott Perry
To send an alert email to multiple recipients, the syntax is: To: %MAILFROM%, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Actually, the IMail1.exe program that Declude uses to send the E-mail won't accept that, because of the space in there (it is very picky!). If you change it to: To: %MAILFROM%,[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] observation to share...

2003-05-29 Thread Charles Frolick
Scott, Have you thought about using Declude Console as a short term dns cache for Declude? I think the results Kami is seeing is because Ipswitch included a DNS cache in the new Queue Manager, and their ip4r test may be using it instead of the DNS. Declude could definitely benefit from it since

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Q: syntax for blacklisting

2003-05-29 Thread Joseph Acac
Is that all? Do I enter something like: TESTNAME WARN **(or HOLD or DELETE) somewhere in the body of the global.cfg? It seems like it still isn't filtering out messages that should have been pulled. At 12:39 05.27.2003, you wrote: Hello - what is the proper syntax for using a blacklist

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] observation to share...

2003-05-29 Thread R. Scott Perry
Have you thought about using Declude Console as a short term dns cache for Declude? This is something that we have been thinking about doing for some time. However, if the DNS server is on the local network, there would be little benefit from doing this (as the local DNS server will cache the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish list reminder... :-)

2003-05-29 Thread Omar K.
Imgate http://imgate.meiway.com/ was specifically made to address these problems. The setup process isn't very cute, but the performance gains are phenomenal. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge) Sent:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Q: syntax for blacklisting

2003-05-29 Thread R. Scott Perry
Is that all? Do I enter something like: TESTNAME WARN **(or HOLD or DELETE) somewhere in the body of the global.cfg? You'll need that line in the \IMail\Declude\$default$.JunkMail file (for incoming E-mail) and/or the \IMail\Declude\global.cfg file (for outgoing E-mail), if you want the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Alert Emails

2003-05-29 Thread Robert Forsyth
To send an alert email to multiple recipients, the syntax is: To: %MAILFROM%, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Actually, the IMail1.exe program that Declude uses to send the E-mail won't accept that, because of the space in there (it is very picky!). If you change it to: To: %MAILFROM%,[EMAIL

RE: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] observation to share...

2003-05-29 Thread Andy Schmidt
Hi: ORDB hatte für den Open-Relay-Check zwei GMX-Adressen verwendet, die nicht auf SMTP-Auth konfiguriert waren. In der eigenen Open-Relay-Definition beschreibe ORDB ein solches System aber als einen Mail-Server, der Nachrichten weiterleite, bei denen weder der Sender noch der Empfänger ein

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.70 (beta) released

2003-05-29 Thread R. Scott Perry
Could you explain: DOSENDERACTIONS ON When this is set (with a line DOSENDERACTIONS ON in the \IMail\Declude\global.cfg file), Declude JunkMail will attempt to take actions on an E-mail based on the sender (as well as any recipients). Declude JunkMail will treat the sender as if it was a

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.69 (beta) released

2003-05-29 Thread Darryl Koster
Scott, I am confused, How do I find out about SPAMDOMAINS test? DOSENDERACTIONS etc..I cannot find anything about any of this in the manual. Darryl Koster ~~ Status Technologies Inc. President/Owner Let Us Help You Get

[Declude.JunkMail] whitelist and mult rcpt

2003-05-29 Thread Karen Oland
We've been getting a lot of spam in the last week or so that bypasses all our spam filters -- they are all copied to the postmaster@ account for our domain. Apparently, they are taking advantage of the common practice of whitelisting the postmaster and the inability of spam filtering programs to

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish list reminder... :-)

2003-05-29 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Does anyone that doesn't agree with Bill have any suggestions? Scott, I'm just wondering what your thoughts are on these proposed changes? FWIW, I have been extremely busy so far this week. I am in the midst of a 3 day Windows Server 2003 training class. Therefore, I have not been able to

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelist and mult rcpt

2003-05-29 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
I know it has been asked for before and said to be impossible (programmer speak, for don't want to do it -- I know, being one), but PLEASE consider creating multiple copies of messages that arrive for multiple recipients, so that the spam filters can operate (yes, this means some

[Declude.JunkMail] Autogenerated response

2003-05-29 Thread Kami Razvan
Title: Message Hi.. I have not been able to figure out how I can have a message delivered and yet an automatic response also be sent to the sender with the original email. I thought we can do this with JM but the only action that I see can send the email with the original message is

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Autogenerated response

2003-05-29 Thread David Lewis-Waller
Title: Message Kami, I know this sounds a little primitive but you couldforewarn users at the point when they make a payment that an automated acknowledgment will be sent but may be blocked if challenge/response is implemented by their ISP/IT dept. What happens in challenge/response when

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Autogenerated response

2003-05-29 Thread Kami Razvan
Title: Message Hi Dave: Yes.. I agree. I wonder how this is handled with Vacation Notices or Auto Responses by IMail. Since all it takes is someone with a vacation notice email someone else with vacation notice... Regards, Kami -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Autogenerated response

2003-05-29 Thread R. Scott Perry
I have not been able to figure out how I can have a message delivered and yet an automatic response also be sent to the sender with the original email. It sounds like you want to use the ALERT action, which is the same as the BOUNCE action except that the E-mail will be delivered rather than