Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New Paypal Phish

2005-05-18 Thread Dave Doherty
It is still active... - Original Message - From: Darin Cox To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 9:52 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] New Paypal Phish This just in from http://222.82.252.206/paypal/ May want to block URLs with that

Re[8]: [Declude.JunkMail] Test Order

2005-05-18 Thread David Sullivan
SF Flip your log into debug mode for a couple of emails. You'll see exactly SF what order everything runs. Great idea. I'll let you know what we find. -- Best regards, Davidmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To

Re: Re::Re: [Declude.JunkMail] example

2005-05-18 Thread Darin Cox
Hi Doug, On the Declude isn't cutting it thread... Declude plus Message Sniffer catches well over 99.9% of spam for us, with spam being about 68% of traffic during the week and 90% over the weekend. So, this combo can certainly be configured to catch almost everything coming in. You might

[Declude.JunkMail] Verizon Faced With Lawsuits Over Blocking eMail From Foreign IP Addresses

2005-05-18 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Verizon Communications has been hit with several lawsuits as a result of the company's policy of blocking email from IP addresses in foreign countries in an effort to reduce spam. The complaint asks that Verizon cease blocking email and that it compensate customers for losses on behalf of

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Verizon Faced With Lawsuits Over Blocking eMail From Foreign IP Addresses

2005-05-18 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
sarcasmWell, this snippet clearly shows that Verizon is on top of this spam problem./sarcasm Carmel said Verizon told him to e-mail the company to get his name put on a whitelist, which frustrated him even further since the company is blocking all of his e-mails. Andrew 8) -Original

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Verizon Faced With Lawsuits Over Blocking eMail From Foreign IP Addresses

2005-05-18 Thread Marc Catuogno
That is f-ed up right there... The damned lawyers are gonna get rich and every VZ customer will get a coupon for a free day of service. Marc -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Verizon Faced With Lawsuits Over Blocking eMail From Foreign IP Addresses

2005-05-18 Thread Marc Catuogno
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kohnswift.com/bio_boni.htm Lets sign him up for a lot of spam from Korea, Japan, etc and see how he feels about blocking foreign IPs then... Sorry to go off on a rant here -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Verizon Faced With Lawsuits Over Blocking eMail From Foreign IP Addresses

2005-05-18 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Lets sign him up for a lot of spam from Korea, Japan, etc and see how he feels about blocking foreign IPs then... Sorry to go off on a rant here The point is a company such as Verizon providing service to a wide and far reaching ranged of customers can not arbitrarily make such a

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Verizon Faced With Lawsuits Over Blocking eMail From Foreign IP Addresses

2005-05-18 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
This kinda scares me. Could this potentially set a precedence that companies can be sued for blocking mail? i.e. You get sued for blocking mail. We all block some legitimate mail at some point.. Thats the nature of the game. Darrell -- invURIBL -

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Verizon Faced With Lawsuits Over Blocking eMail From Foreign IP Addresses

2005-05-18 Thread Matt
I think this is good. Just think about the issues that you would have if Verizon indiscriminately blocked you. We have heard a bunch of stories about AOL and their spam reporting mechanism blacklisting servers that are just merely forwarding to them. If these companies blacklist providers like

[Declude.JunkMail] Should have been whitelisted

2005-05-18 Thread Robert Grosshandler
The following e-mail got tagged as spam, even though it was from an authenticated send. First, the imail log: 20050518 115243 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (72db5d54010e1dde) [64.4.213.172] connect 184.122.4.102 port 2528 (this is a remote user)20050518 115243 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (72db5d54010e1dde

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Should have been whitelisted

2005-05-18 Thread Andy Schmidt
04:19 PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] Should have been whitelisted The following e-mail got tagged as spam, even though it was from an authenticated send. First, the imail log: 20050518 115243 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (72db5d54010e1dde) [64.4.213.172] connect 184.122.4.102

[Declude.JunkMail] Spool and Overflow Folders...

2005-05-18 Thread Ralph Krausse
We have had reports from some customers that their spool and overflow folders have been slowly backing up using Declude 2.0.6 If you are experiencing this kind of problem, type Declude -diag at the command prompt. SmarterMail If you see 'Using

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spool and Overflow Folders...

2005-05-18 Thread Matt
Ralph, I ran declude -diag three times in a row and on the second run it showed "Using [im.decludekey.us]" multiple times, but not for the first and the third attempts. Could it be that this is just simply sporadic and affects everyone on 2.0.6? One other thing...how often does this phone

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Should have been whitelisted

2005-05-18 Thread Robert Grosshandler
aha, I thought smtp auth trumped all. Makes sense. Is there a way to add negative weight to smtp auth ? Thanks!! From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy SchmidtSent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 3:32 PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spool and Overflow Folders...

2005-05-18 Thread Bill Landry
I see three instances of "Using [im.decludekey.us]" every time I run the "declude -diag" command on my two IMail/Declude servers. I use the following setting in my declude.cfg files: DNS xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx because I don't use the same DNS setting for Declude as I have configure in IMail. I

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Verizon Faced With Lawsuits Over Blocking eMail From Foreign IP Addresses

2005-05-18 Thread Don Brown
I think you're reading more into it than is there. Verizon didn't deliver what it promised or, to say it differently, Verizon didn't deliver what their customers had a reasonable expectation of receiving. That's the issue. The allegation, and I think it is probably true, is that Verizon

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Verizon Faced With Lawsuits Over Blocking eMail From Foreign IP Addresses

2005-05-18 Thread Matt
FYI, with all of the offshoring that is going on, don't be surprised to see E-mail from otherwise American companies coming from servers (connecting to your server) from places like China and India. For instance, mssupport.microsoft.com has come to my server from 210.22.110.0/24, and even

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spool and Overflow Folders...

2005-05-18 Thread Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango
Thanks.. I tested it.. im.decludekey.us showed up 3 times. I configured the dnsoverride and the the using text was displayed only once. No more im.decludekey.us texts. Is that OK? Besides one more setting I have to keep in mind when changing DNSs or when switching servers (in case de