Scott,
I agree, unfortunately I do not have that information at present, I have
requested this information from the engineers and will post it a soon as
this is available.
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott
Erik,
I have also asked the engineers to look into this for us, ie. A directive to
force tests to run in a specific order.
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2005 5:34 PM
To:
At this point the latest ALL_LIST.DAT (Monday, April 11, 2005) is currently
located here:
http://www.declude.com/version/release/all_list.dat
There will be a new ALL_LIST.DAT with the release of Declude 3.0
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If Declude is reading this... To help comfort those who think we are not
paying attention. We read all posts and take notice of everything that is
said.
I will look at adding this to the Knowledge Base next week.
David Barker
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
If you are running the Declude Beta please upgrade to 3.0.3.8 and send
feedback to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David B
www.declude.com
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The
Hi John,
1. The only Beta that should currently be running is 3.0.3.7 you should not
be reverting to a previous version of the Beta at this point.
2. If you have to revert the best options would be 1.82 for Imail and
2.0.6.16 For SmarterMail
3. We have fixed the issue reported to us by Darrell
In your virus.cfg file:
AVAFTERJM ON
Also ensure that you have the directive:
PRESCANON
David B
www.declude.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Farris
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 11:56 AM
To:
Dan,
What version for Declude Beta were you running? As we have
not seen the behavior you are referring to.
David B
www.declude.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan
HorneSent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 1:58 PMTo:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject:
] On Behalf Of David Barker
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 2:04 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Is there any hope running Declude with
imail8.21???
Dan,
What version for Declude Beta were you running? As we have not seen the
behavior you are referring
there is wondering what the heck I'm talking
about, check the archive for my posting of my SKIPATTACH test.
Andrew 8)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 11:54 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject
] On Behalf Of David Barker
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 11:54 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Is there any hope running Declude with
imail8.21???
Dan,
1. 3.0.3 in our testing has been considerably quicker than that of
earlier versions of Declude.
2
Sharyn,
1. What is the test you have defined for 10-REVDNS ?
2. Do you have WHITELIST AUTH enabled in your global.cfg ?
David B
www.declude.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sharyn Schmidt
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005
Declude Beta 3.0 is available which works with Imail 8.20+ if you have a
valid service agreement this can be downloaded from our website from the My
Account Home Page when you log in.
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
You could try adding the following or something similar at the beginning of
your filter
BODYEND CONTAINSContent-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Or instead of END a -10 depending n the values in your filter.
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Thanks for the feedback.
I have posted decludeproc.exe 3.0.12 which should take care of the issue of
decludeproc stopping on its own.
Also remember you can increase the number of THREADS in your declude.cfg,
the default is 5 you should be able to move this up to 25 quite easily or
even double it
backed
up
David -
Would you kindly confirm exactly what version of Declude this 3.0 beta is
derived from? Is it 2.0.6.16 ?
Thanks
-Nick
David Barker wrote:
Thanks for the feedback.
I have posted decludeproc.exe 3.0.12 which should take care of the
issue of decludeproc stopping on its own
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Horne
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 11:13 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] D3: Service stopped on its own, files backed
up
David Barker wrote on Tuesday, August 30, 2005 10:42 AM:
Thanks for the feedback.
I have posted
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] D3: Service stopped on its own, files backed
up
should is my question. I was just looking for a confirmation as to what I
would be changing to.
-Nick
David Barker wrote:
All functionality that existed in 2.0.6.16 should be in Declude 3.0
Beta the main difference
I will be posting a new decludeproc.exe Beta 3.0.21 before the end of today.
The new one should:
* take care of the orphaned files in the proc directory
* improve on performance
* deal with the sm$ files
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Ping.
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Hi David,
If possible you should use the IPBYPASS rather than the HOP
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 12:27 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: Re[2]:
thought I would mention it. As it was suggested to test HELO-DYNAMIC
using the WARN action.
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Sullivan
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 1:45 PM
To: David Barker
Subject: Re[4
Kevin,
After reviewing your files you had sent me this is the problem you are
having:
1. The email you received was encoded in BASE64 (Msg failed BASE64)
2. In your global.cfg you have the following directive:
DECODE OFF
Therefore your STOCKFILTER did not trigger - as nowhere in the
of any bugs with the CONTAINS filter statement?
Thanks!
-Nick
David Barker wrote:
Kevin,
After reviewing your files you had sent me this is the problem you are
having:
1. The email you received was encoded in BASE64 (Msg failed BASE64)
2. In your global.cfg you have the following
Chuck,
Send me your global.cfg and $default$.junkmail that I can have a look to see
if there are additional tests that we can use, to help increase scoring on
spam.
David B
dbarker @ declude.com
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
We have identified compatibility issues with Imail version 8.20 and all
versions of Declude. A new release of Declude is in the works and we are
currently entering into volume testing. This release is our highest
priority.
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Kevin,Please email me a copy of your global.cfg with the filter you
are using as well as the email body and header of the email that did not trigger
the test and I will have a look at it. dbarker @
declude.comThanksDavid Bwww.declude.com
From: Kevin Bilbee
To:
Dan,
You can use a base64 decoder
http://www.opinionatedgeek.com/dotnet/tools/Base64Decode/Default.aspx
=?iso-8859-1?B?SG9ybnkgcGlsbHMgLSA3NSUgT0ZG?= is Horny pills - 75% OFF
Trim the string down to SG9ybnkgcGlsbHMgLSA3NSUgT0ZG
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Try adding the following line to the filter (which basically says do not run
this filter if the recipients domain is not listed)
ALLRECIPS END NOTCONTAINS @domain.com
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
It can be a good idea to take into account the IPNOTINMX and NOLEGITCONTENT
which can bring down the weight under the threshold because this is a total
of -8 I set the SKIPIFWEIGHT 8 points higher. Eg. I mark on WEIGHT15
SUBJECT so I use SKIPIFWEIGHT 23
David B
www.declude.com
-Original
Title: SO OT its' almost embarrasing: How to get in touch with Yahoo?
Sharyn,
I do not think there is anything they will do to change the
search engine rankings. The only way I would think you could resolve this is to
ensure your website ranks higher using legitimate SEO
techniques.
David
Title: Message
Can you give the URL so we can see what site you are
talking about. Also there is NO way Yahoo is going to reallytell you why
they are listed, search engine listings are a highly guarded
secret.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sharyn
It depends a few factors:
1. If you have the PRO version you have the ability to do outbound scanning
2. If you are using WHITELIST AUTH or Whitelisting your domains or
Whitelisting your IP anything originating from your domain will not be
stopped.
3. Declude can be configured to catch spam on
Will,
Just to make sure, your Imail is passing on mail to another server and
therefore acting as a gateway that is why you are using OUTBOUND actions
correct?
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Will
Sent: Wednesday,
In your $default$.junkmail where you have a HOLD as an Action try putting a
%DATE% after eg:
WEIGHT20HOLD %DATE%
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd Ryan
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 11:57 AM
To:
Title: Message
Fredrick,
But with these there are no spaces in the x line: but with
this one X-Spam-Tests-Failed-Weight:
there is a space.
David B
www.declude.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frederick
SamarelliSent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 4:28
Any feedback on these tests and performance will be appreciated here is some
info on these tests.
BCC bcc 10 x 5 0
This test type, checks to see if there are more than X known BCC:'s for this
E-mail (where X is the first test-type-specific piece of information set to
10
If you are forwarding mail to another server in other words using Declude
for OUTBOUND scanning the Actions are defined in the global.cfg also
consider it will be using the xoutheaders in your global.cfg.
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test
On 12 Apr 2005 at 13:16, David Barker wrote:
Hi David,
BCC bcc 10 x 5 0
This test type, checks to see if there are more than X known BCC:'s
I think Darrell's question was related to optimum setting rather than
That is correct, these two tests were among several tests added to the
global.cfg file, as they were documented by Scott, however they are not
available in the current declude.exe as we move forward with adding
additional tests these will very likely be activated in future releases.
David B
You could look at DLAnalyzer which provides an easy way to generate
comprehensive reports on Declude Virus and Junkmail.
http://www.invariantsystems.com/dlanalyzer/
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry
It depends on the reason for using WHITELIST AUTH if it is because outgoing
mail is being marked as spam or held you can look at the settings and
ACTIONS in global.cfg also you could try adding the following line to your
global.cfg
WHITELIST FROM @yourdomain.com
Where yourdomain is actually the
i looking in the
wrong direction?
Thanks again,
Joe
-- Original Message --
From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 16:04:55 -0500
Joe here is a very basic filter but hopefully will help get you
Joe here is a very basic filter but hopefully will help get you started:
SKIPIFWEIGHT 16
MINWEIGHTTOFAIL 3
MAXWEIGHT 12
#Subject
SUBJECT 3 CONTAINS Online Pharmacy
#Words
BODY 5 CONTAINS Meds
BODY 2 CONTAINS cheap Perscriptions
BODY 2 CONTAINS No prescription required
BODY 2 CONTAINS No
Fred,
There are quite a few out there I have heard that
http://www.hostingaccelerator.com/ is pretty good.
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frederick Samarelli
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 11:24 AM
To:
that was posted.
Is there a target date for 2.06?
I've asked for a list of known issues with 2.05 previously, with no answer.
Also wanted to know if all known issues were being addressed in 2.06.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail
Yes I did mean 28 March 05 but considering most people need things yesterday
I guess you could say that was appropriate :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 11:07 AM
To:
Maybe you missed the post that was made a few days ago.
There have been a number of posts on the JunkMail list regarding the DELETE
issue and a fix is currently being tested both internally and externally.
Subject to receiving a green light from our external testers and no new
issues arising we
Thank you for your feedback. Ihave fixed
it.Friday night 10:30 pm. What we do too please our customers ;) As for
the website it is my responsibility and not that of our programmers, so you can
be confident that this does not reflect our programmers skills.
David B
www.declude.com
-
ery second...
window.setTimeout("tick();", 1000);
or even strip off the seconds and just display
minutes.
Many web developers put this in for the "cool"
factor, or because they can, butseconds provide little value in this
case.
Darin.
- Original Messa
Yes Declude is down. We are aware of the problem and working to resolve
this. We will be back up asap.
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hirthe, Alexander
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 11:45 AM
To:
Kyle,
From the system documentation written by Scott Perry.
IGNORE This action does not do anything (aside from log that the E-mail
failed the test). Same as the LOG action.
LOG This action does not do anything (aside from log that the E-mail
failed the test). Same as the IGNORE
Goran,
1. Do you have a copy of the actual email header ?
2. Is this Qbca31d68008ed51d the only test that failed ?
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran Jovanovic
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 10:44 AM
To:
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 10:59 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Body filter adding extra 10 points
Goran,
1. Do you have a copy of the actual email header ?
2. Is this Qbca31d68008ed51d the only test that failed
1. In the delcude folder if you are not running
Hijackrename the file hijack.cfg to hijack.bak
2. Open your global.cfg comment out the line CONSOLE
ON
David B
www.declude.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff
FrantzSent: Friday, February 25, 2005 11:09
Kyle,
When willyou stop signing up for those
gambling sites, you know you can't win? :)
No reported increase on our side.
David B
www.declude.com
- Original Message -
From:
Kyle Fisher
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 5:40
PM
Which can under certain circumstances be correct.
If you had signed up with the websitethen declude is correct in
identifying them as legitimate email. It is possible we could set up some
additional filters to help with a specific type of Spam.
David B
www.declude.com
- Original
As AUTOWHITELIST ON is in your global.cfg is it possible that
ameripride.org is in an address book ?
David B
www.declude.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Anderson
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 4:13 PM
To:
601 - 658 of 658 matches
Mail list logo
