Richard Farris wrote:
Is there a box I can put in front of my Imail server that will help take
some of the load off of the spam filtering that Declude is doing
IMGate. http://imgate.meiway.com/
I'm seeing a reduction in rejected messages with no reduction in
delivered mail.
This
Chuck Schick wrote:
How are you viewing the message? It is probably associated with the
email client settings. I know some email clients have the option of
showing headers - you have to make sure the option is turned off. This
is also true of webmail.
I know what he is talking about.
Matt wrote:
Thanks John, you are correct about the 83.333 number, and that is
still about 10 times the typical amount for domains on my server. I
could only really imagine this happening if IMail was accepting all
E-mail to the domains hosted on it regardless of there being an actual
Bill wrote:
We had the same problem last year. It was a bug in one of the
releases of Imail and was latter fixed. I am not sure what version had
the problem but the latest version (8.20 with hotfix 2) works correctly.
Thanks. It appears we stumped Declude with this one. I was going to
Didn't see anything like this in the archives but of course it could be
the way I was searching.
We're using WAMCHECK as an externalplus and when a mail is sent using
the web interface or from a client to/from domains on the same machine
the results are not honored.
We have tried forcing
issue is trickier still.
Rod
--
Roderick A. Anderson
Technology Services Management Group
http://www.technologyservicesmanagementgroup.com/
Spokane WA, 99202
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com
Bill wrote:
Rod,
WAMCHECK is whitelisting the message. Currently, WAMCHECK looks at only
the first addressee to determine an action (for all addressees). I am
looking at changing this in the future but for now, that's what is
happening.
Thanks Bill. We were think the same but couldn't
' into multiple copies (?) before
processing by Declude? Can Declude do this? If not any ideas as to how?
TIA,
Rod
--
Roderick A. Anderson
Technology Services Management Group
http://www.technologyservicesmanagementgroup.com/
Spokane WA, 99202
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
that is
was slipping by.
With this does anyone have a script or program that will backtrace a
message through all the log files -- Declude and iMail -- given the
message ID or some such? This way I can look up specifics of why the
badheaders and spamheaders are being triggered.
TIA,
Rod
--
Roderick
not aware of such a tool.
Hum. Potential there. It is a problem often enough for us I'll
probably write one.
Has there been any message threads on the files (logs) and the key
fields in them to chase them down?
Rod
--
Roderick A. Anderson
Technology Services Management Group
http
eh?)
Where can I find more information about BADHEADERS/SPAMHEADERS and how
to fix the messages so they don't get caught?
TIA,
Rod
--
Roderick A. Anderson
Technology Services Management Group
http://www.technologyservicesmanagementgroup.com/
Spokane WA, 99202
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses
John Tolmachoff (Lists) wrote:
http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=100
Damn! I had this bookmarked but below a couple of other Declude
articles and completely missed it. Thanks for the whack with the
clue-stick. :-)
Rod
--
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
at a time
read the first ??? lines looking for domain.com
if found close the file and move the file to the other directory
else close the file and do the next file
HTH,
Rod
--
Roderick A. Anderson
Project Manager
Technology Services Management Group
http://www.technologyservicesmanagementgroup.com
Does Declude actually place messages, besides those that make it
through, in the folder/mailbox or does it deliver to iMail with a
suggestion (?) of which folder to place the message in?
Example:
SPAMCOPMAILBOX spam
TIA,
Rod
--
Roderick A. Anderson
Project Manager
Technology
came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
--
Roderick A. Anderson
Project
]
--
Roderick A. Anderson
Project Manager
Technology Services Management Group
http://www.technologyservicesmanagementgroup.com/
Spokane WA, 99202
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came
have is the Message-ID and I'm trying to find out why/how
it made it through Declude. Other messsages from the same source and a
mostly similar content are not making it through.
TIA,
Rod
--
Roderick A. Anderson
Project Manager
Technology Services Management Group
http
Yeah a real pain. My concern is mostly last July's logs getting written
over or blended with this years. If they are uniquely named then no
issue. A dribble of the previous days data in the next or previous
days data isn't an issue for me.
Thanks for the thoughts.
Rod
--
Roderick
groet,
Bonno Bloksma
Rod
--
Roderick A. Anderson
Project Manager
Technology Services Management Group
http://www.technologyservicesmanagementgroup.com/
Spokane WA, 99202
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http
The docs say a in the filename used with LOGFILE will be replaced
with the month and day. Is there a way to get the year -- four
(preferred) or two digit -- included?
TIA,
Rod
--
Roderick A. Anderson
Technology Services Management Group
http://www.technologyservicesmanagementgroup.com
the scheduler
and do what has to be done.
Thanks to all for the suggestions..
Rod
--
Roderick A. Anderson
Project Manager
Technology Services Management Group
http://www.technologyservicesmanagementgroup.com/
Spokane WA, 99202
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E
upped the max number of processes to 45 but I
haven't been brave enough to tested it again since one small mistake and
we're out-of processes for an hour.
Rod
--
Roderick A. Anderson
Technology Services Management Group
http://www.technologyservicesmanagementgroup.com/
Spokane WA, 99202
---
[This E
name that the test is
actually used. Sorry for being so slow...
Actually I think it is that all tests in global.cfg are run. I just ran
into this last week. I am now in search of a method to only run the test
if any of a other set of tests fail?
Rod
--
Roderick A. Anderson
Project Manager
line just fine.
TIA,
Rod
--
Roderick A. Anderson
Technology Services Management Group
http://www.technologyservicesmanagementgroup.com/
Spokane WA, 99202
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com
/
Defuse Dictionary Attacks: Turn Exchange Addresses into IMail Aliases!
http://www.mailmage.com/products/software/freeutils/exchange2aliases/download/release/
Rod
--
Roderick A. Anderson
Project Manager
Technology Services Management Group
http
through the list archives and get the impression this
should work the way I think it should not the way it is.
So is there a step or twelve I've missed or added that causes it to run
for all e-mail instead of just for the ones where it is in the
*.junkmail file?
TIA,
Rod
--
Roderick A. Anderson
)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
--
Roderick
Message -
From: Roderick A. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 7:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] NEw tests runs for all email
OK.
Is there anyway around this, perhaps by defining the test in a domain
$default$.junkmail or individual's
I've looked in the documentation and haven't found (can't find :-) if it
is possible to have a per user alert message. We need to build the
messages with custom values (fields) from a database.
TIA,
Rod
--
Roderick A. Anderson
Project Manager
Technology Services Management Group
http
). Could
this be causing the error we're seeing with bounce messages not showing
the real To: adderss when we use %ALLRECIPS%? and %REALRECIPS% ?
Rod
--
Roderick A. Anderson
Project Manager
Technology Services Management Group
http://www.technologyservicesmanagementgroup.com/
Spokane WA, 99202
WAMCHECK be causing these problems? I didn't think so so I never
mentioned it was in the pot with Declude.
Rod
--
Roderick A. Anderson
Project Manager
Technology Services Management Group
http://www.technologyservicesmanagementgroup.com/
Spokane WA, 99202
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses
Darin Cox wrote:
Does %ALLRECIPS% do what you want?
Darin.
No it doesn't. %ALLRECIPS% gives the last address(es) delivered to not
the initial address. So if the address chain (?) is
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' - sends to -
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' = forwards to =
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' =
R. Scott Perry wrote:
%ALLRECIPS% gives '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' when I need
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. %MAILFROM% gives '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' which
is great. I was hoping for a %MAILTO% that would give me
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.
Actually, in this case, I believe Declude will actually just see
[EMAIL
forwarded one account
to another account that ends up at the Declude scanned account. Yup ..
pretty convoluted but I'm seeing it happen.
Any 'undocumented' variables or tricks I can use to get this value into
the bounce message?
TIA,
Rod
--
Roderick A. Anderson
Technology Services Management
34 matches
Mail list logo
