My DNS server is set up as a cashing server but non-local DNS requests
have to be forwarded somewhere, don't they?
No. Forwarding is a feature that should normally be off by default.
The way that a caching DNS server works, it connects to the root servers
and drills down until it reaches the
Hi,
I am having a problem with my upstream DNS provider. I have my own
in-house DNS server but for non-local host DNS requests, they are
forwarded to my T1 provider's DNS server. The problem is that their
server has become unreliable. Their server usually does not go down
completely but just
I am having a problem with my upstream DNS provider. I have my own
in-house DNS server but for non-local host DNS requests, they are
forwarded to my T1 provider's DNS server
What I was wondering is if there is a free or fee based outbound DNS
provider? Or is there a master DNS server that I
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 6:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS
Hi,
I am having a problem with my upstream DNS provider. I have my own in-house
DNS server but for non-local host DNS requests, they are forwarded to my T1
provider's DNS server
Is it possible to run the DNS RBL tests in a file other than the global
config file?
For example have them all in separate filter file that I can abort with
TESTFAILED END CONTAINS
Rick Davidson
National Systems Manager
North American Title Group
440-953-9346 - Office
440-953-0925 - Fax
You could have them assigned with a 0 weight in the global.cfg.
You can then use your filters to assign weights as described below.
Scott Fisher
Director of IT
Farm Progress Companies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/28/04 10:05AM
Is it possible to run the DNS RBL tests in a file other than the global
o the simplicity of it all :-)
Rick Davidson
National Systems Manager
North American Title Group
-
- Original Message -
From: Scott Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS tests in separate file?
You could
Scott,
I just came across an issue where DNS Report was giving me a failure for
the following:
FAIL
Connect to mail servers
ERROR: I could not connect to one or more of your mailservers:
mx2.mailpure.com: Connection closed before I received all my data (state
8). Your mailserver disconnected
I just came across an issue where DNS Report was giving me a failure for
the following:
FAIL
Connect to mail servers
ERROR: I could not connect to one or more of your mailservers:
mx2.mailpure.com: Connection closed before I received all my data (state
8). Your mailserver disconnected before
Interesting. ORF gives you the option to disconnect and I'm wondering
if it is wise despite the 20 year old stipulation in the RFC:
Close SMTP connection when blocking
The Open Relay Filter Enterprise Edition blocks the spam when the
remote server tries to specify the message recipient(s). ORF
TECTED]
On Behalf Of MattSent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 06:02
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
[Declude.JunkMail] DNS Report mail server
failureInteresting. ORF gives you the option to
disconnect and I'm wondering if it is wise despite the 20 year old stipulation
in the RFC:
Close
Whenever I have to bring my primary dns server down a lot of spam gets
through. It appears that declude is only using one DNS server. Is there a
way for it to use my secondary DNS when the primary is down?
thanks
Harry Vanderzand
inTown Internet Computer Services
11 Belmont Ave. W.
PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry Vanderzand
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 4:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS
Whenever I have to bring my primary dns server down a lot of spam gets
through. It appears that declude is only
Hey all ,
Is the dns stuff page down? Just wondering
Bennie
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an
Is the dns stuff page down? Just wondering
Not now. :)
Note that if you ever cannot get to http://www.dnsstuff.com you can use
http://backup.dnsstuff.com .
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
In diagnosing why some messages are slipping through, I manually analyzed
the headers using spamcop and noticed that spamcop reported a blacklist
that wasn't getting scored by declude.
I'm assuming the problem is a DNS timeout when declude is trying to
perform the lookup test.
Either that, or
What is the syntax to tell Declude to use a DNS server in the Global.cfg
Fred
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 6:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS timeout and DNS configuration - does it
get logged
What is the syntax to tell Declude to use a DNS server in the Global.cfg
DNS 192.0.2.25 (without the quotes).
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:35:01 -0500
DLAnalyzer Support said something about Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS timeout and DNS
configuration - does it get logged?:
DNS line in the \IMail\Declude\global.cfg file). Note that it is
recommended (with or without Declude) that you only use 1 DNS server
DNS line in the \IMail\Declude\global.cfg file). Note that it is
recommended (with or without Declude) that you only use 1 DNS server in
the IMail SMTP settings.
What types of problems tend to crop up with multiple DNS servers listed in
Imail?
Darrell
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses
Hi,
In diagnosing why some messages are slipping through, I manually analyzed the headers
using spamcop and noticed that spamcop reported a blacklist that wasn't getting scored
by declude.
I'm assuming the problem is a DNS timeout when declude is trying to perform the lookup
test.
I'm
Birkenstocks, play roll playing games, and have
names like Dr. Kilroy.
I know, I used to be one. :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 2:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail
]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 8:36 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Reports timing out?
I've been running MS DNS since NT 4.0.
W2003's DNS is much better but I've NEVER had a problem with any MS DNS.
You're being told BIND is much better by a bunch of guys who drink
Mountain
Dew
I went to dnsreports and everything seems to be timing out.
Marc
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just
I went to dnsreports and everything seems to be timing out.
It's fixed now (good 'ole BIND hung again).
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is
good 'ole BIND hung again
Nah - that can't be. Everyone here is beating up on MS DNS and tells us
that only BIND is suitable for production use by any sane person because it
is infallible? G
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail
: Monday, February 16, 2004 1:49 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Reports timing out?
good 'ole BIND hung again
Nah - that can't be. Everyone here is beating up on MS DNS and tells us
that only BIND is suitable for production use by any sane person because it
is infallible? G
---
[This E
Title: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Warnings
Is there a way to have something we could take action on
ifwhen Declude queries the DNS Server andlogs aWARNING SERVER
FAILURE (i.e. HOLD, ROUTETO)? It seems in my testing, none of these
domains that it got this for where legititmate (see below
Is there a way to have something we could take action on if when Declude
queries the DNS Server and logs a WARNING SERVER FAILURE (i.e. HOLD,
ROUTETO)? It seems in my testing, none of these domains that it got this
for where legititmate (see below).
The problem here occurs if *your* DNS
oid detection. Certainly the less information
you have, the harder it is to identify and track the spammer.
Matt
Keith Johnson wrote:
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Warnings
Is there a way to have something
we could take action on ifwhen Declude queries the DNS Server andlogs
aWARNING S
I noticed in our Declude Log (running MID) that we have numerous of the below message
(different domains). Is this telling me that there was no MX or A record listed for
the lookup domain? I pretty sure, however, just wanted to check, thanks for the aid.
Keith
WARNING: DNS server
I noticed in our Declude Log (running MID) that we have numerous of the
below message (different domains). Is this telling me that there was no
MX or A record listed for the lookup domain? I pretty sure, however, just
wanted to check, thanks for the aid.
It is saying that your DNS server
, have a good weekend.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun 1/25/2004 9:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Warnings
I noticed in our
Thanks for the aid. I'm with you on the second point, I think
our DNS server (Bind 8.4.3) attempted to verify the domain (all of them
look spam in nature) and couldn't find an A or MX listed for them and
returned back to Declude that warning.
Actually, the server failure should
not connect to them via telnet or nslookup's
Keith
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun 1/25/2004 10:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Warnings
/2004 10:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Warnings
Thanks for the aid. I'm with you on the second point, I
think
our DNS server (Bind
Best bang for the buck: http://www.jhsoft.com/
And way too easy to setup..
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of P C
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 12:45 PM - FamHost
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS trouble
say we are smaller than what you have a small.. only 1500 customers.
Bennie
PepperLink
- Original Message -
From: P C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 1:44 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS trouble with Declude? / Best DNS Server for
Windows
Could someone recommend the best (most stable) DNS Server for Windows 2000+? Or, can
the Windows 2003 built in DNS Server handle traffic for a small ISP (3000 customers)
plus Imail/Declude DNS-based spam database lookups and the occasional DDOS attack?
Our current Linux DNS server
to take a good
look at:
http://cr.yp.to/djbdns.html
for a DNS server that is faster, lighter, and more robust than *those
others*.
Andrew 8)
-Original Message-
From: P C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 10:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS
I have used the Win2000 DNS server happily for quite some time. We host
about 500 websites and 4000 mailboxes. We average about 25 DNS requests per
second and peak around 200. We do not provide access, only server-based
services.
I write all the zone files by hand. I find it quicker and easier
Scott,
I have over 5000 ip's that I have blocked with Imails ACL -now over
time I am worried that some my need to be removed. Since I cannot
think of a way to check them all at once I am considering a filter
file with thousands of lines or is a dns blacklist the better choice?
Or?
Thanks
I have over 5000 ip's that I have blocked with Imails ACL -now over
time I am worried that some my need to be removed. Since I cannot
think of a way to check them all at once I am considering a filter
file with thousands of lines or is a dns blacklist the better choice?
Or?
The IMail Control
Is anyone able to get to the site? www.dnsreport.com Just want to make sure
that it's just not me that is having problems.
Thanks,
Greg
attachment: winmail.dat
Yes, I can.
*
817-329-5275 PH
817-329-1189 FX
intercityweb.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 9:30 AM
To: Declude JunkMail (E-mail)
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Report
PROTECTED] im Auftrag von Greg Foulks
Gesendet am: Montag, 13. Oktober 2003 16:30
An: Declude JunkMail (E-mail)
Betreff: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Report
Is anyone able to get to the site? www.dnsreport.com Just want to make sure
that it's just not me that is having problems.
Thanks
Seems like it just came back up.
Thanks,
Greg
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 10:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Report
Yes, I can.
*
817-329
Seattle can get to it.
M
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 7:30 AM
To: Declude JunkMail (E-mail)
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Report
Is anyone able to get to the site? www.dnsreport.com Just
I get it
Hermann
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 4:30 PM
To: Declude JunkMail (E-mail)
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Report
Is anyone able to get to the site? www.dnsreport.com Just want
We host a web site for a client who hosts and runs their own mail server.
Their mail to me fails as following:
X-RBL-Warning: REVDNS: This E-mail was sent from a MUA/MTA 209.83.72.234
with no reverse DNS entry.
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [209.83.72.234]
X-Note: This E-mail was scanned by
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Harlan Young
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 11:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS/mail guru?
We host a web site for a client who hosts and runs their own mail server.
Their mail to me fails
We host a web site for a client who hosts and runs their own mail server.
Their mail to me fails as following:
X-RBL-Warning: REVDNS: This E-mail was sent from a MUA/MTA 209.83.72.234
with no reverse DNS entry.
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [209.83.72.234]
X-Note: This E-mail was scanned by
but I am sure Scott and others would
know- Can DNS be faked?
Regards,
Kami
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rifat Levis
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 6:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Test?
It is seems like
Being able to block on DNS servers today would at least be a temporary leg
up for the white hats.
In the end, DNS servers can be as easily registered as goofy domain names.
They could set up an automated process to register a new batch of DNS
servers daily. They could conceivably run the DNS
Hello all,
I have 3 mx records for my domain. The first 2 are pointing to the external
mail gateways (primary and backup) both running Imail with declude
junkmail/virus. The 3rd mx record points directly to my internal exchange
server (running scanmail), which bypasses all junkmail and virus
I have 3 mx records for my domain. The first 2 are pointing to the external
mail gateways (primary and backup) both running Imail with declude
junkmail/virus. The 3rd mx record points directly to my internal exchange
server (running scanmail), which bypasses all junkmail and virus scanning by
Title: Message
Hi..
I have been
looking at this trend and perhaps having another tool in our arsenal could
help.
Can there be a
header or a variable we can assign weight to for DNS?
A lot of spam
houses have a DNS server and several that I checked were showing the same name
server for
What is happening here is that the spammer is using their own software
(spamware) to send the spam. Knowing that many people don't scan E-mail
that comes through their backup mailserver(s), their spamware chooses to
try the backup mailservers first.
If your Exchange server isn't running any
I have been looking at this trend and perhaps having another tool in our
arsenal could help.
Can there be a header or a variable we can assign weight to for DNS?
A lot of spam houses have a DNS server and several that I checked were
showing the same name server for their domains.
Just like a
Can't wait for this one!
On Friday, July 18, 2003 11:10, R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been looking at this trend and perhaps having another tool in our
arsenal could help.
Can there be a header or a variable we can assign weight to for DNS?
A lot of spam houses have a DNS
Levis
- Original Message -
From: Dan Patnode [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 12:40 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Test?
Can't wait for this one!
On Friday, July 18, 2003 11:10, R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been looking
: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Test?
It is seems like a intersting test , but it will do more harm to ISP ,
I am just thinking my case , having more than thousands domains.
If 1 of those domains start doing a spam , thousands of others will have
problems.
The isp mail servers also .
Adding a small
countries with harsh language.
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Joshua Levitsky
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 3:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Test?
Think of the companies that offer
PROTECTED] Behalf Of Joshua Levitsky
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 3:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Test?
Think of the companies that offer spammers a haven. If you could block
everything hosted by that ISP it would be wicked nice. There's no
end to the
mail
: Friday, July 18, 2003 5:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Test?
Great letter Kevin, but I recently tried to explain this to a
company and their engineer said that it was by design. His
explanation was that they did it for security/obscurity reasons
and we were
After I found a problem and corrected a problem with the postmaster
alias and added an abuse alias, I was able to successfully send email to
both addresses from an external account.
How exactly does one get rid of the failures/warnings for these items?
How long does it take?
Mike
---
[This
After I found a problem and corrected a problem with the postmaster alias
and added an abuse alias, I was able to successfully send email to both
addresses from an external account.
How exactly does one get rid of the failures/warnings for these items?
How long does it take?
Are you talking
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 5:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Server
Has there been any more thought to allow Declude to have
Has there been any more thought to allow Declude to have an option to either
use more than one DNS server, or have failover support to a secondary DNS
server?
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by
Has there been any more thought to allow Declude to have an option to
either
use more than one DNS server, or have failover support to a secondary DNS
server?
It's something that we are considering. The catch, though, is that it
would only really be useful in conjunction with the Declude
In regards to Declude does it use the second DNS IP address specified in
IMAIL if the first is not available.
No, it does not. It only uses the first DNS server that is listed.
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
I have suffered from this also, so much so that I have even explored the use
of SimpleDNS without success thinking that this was a external DNS problem.
I was hoping that by bringing the DNS (as a DNS cache) locally to the mail
server did infact reduce the frequency of this error, unfortunately
to
at least add a weighting to the obvious fakes.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry
Sent: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 09:00:14 -0500
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS server returned server failure for
I have suffered from this also, so much so that I have even explored the use
I see server failures on a bunch of obviously fake hostnames:
WARNING: DNS server 216.12.134.208 returned a SERVER FAILURE error for MX
or A for Me.
WARNING: DNS server 216.12.134.208 returned a SERVER FAILURE error for MX
or A for host3.
WARNING: DNS server 216.12.134.208 returned a SERVER
What is the best way to diagnose/investigate these:
03/11/2003 11:04:05 Q33230c6100e83de9 WARNING: DNS server 67.94.227.35
returned a SERVER FAILURE error for MX or A for
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
---
John,
I've been running around in circles chasing this problem. Basically its an error that
your DNS server doesn't understand well enough to give the correct code for. The
problem then is that Declude misses out on any kind of DNS test opportunity because as
Scott explains it, reacting to
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Patnode
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 11:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS server returned server failure for
John,
I've been running around in circles chasing
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 11:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS server returned server failure for
Well, I guess I could always run netmon. It is just that it has been such a
long time since I did that I will have to relearn how to filter
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS server returned server failure for
What is the best way to diagnose/investigate these:
03/11/2003 11:04:05 Q33230c6100e83de9 WARNING: DNS server 67.94.227.35
returned a SERVER FAILURE error for MX or A for
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
Last week we have had a problem for 2 hours because the FW-Admin changed
the policy-structure on the firewall between our Junkmail-Server and our
DNS-Servers and forget to reconfigure the neccessary rules.
Beside other problems there was specialy one with declude junkmail:
Because all DNS-based
Beside other problems there was specialy one with declude junkmail:
Because all DNS-based tests timed out, all incoming mail was blocked
from the weighting system.
The DNS-based tests have failsafes built in to make sure that they do not
get triggered if no response comes back. They only get
change on a firewall rule can do...
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner;declude.com] On Behalf Of R.
Scott Perry
Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 2:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS-based Tests
Beside
To specify more than one DNS server in Junkmail:
- does it work properly?
- which would be the proper format:
DNS 1.2.3.4 5.6.7.8
...or
DNS 1.2.3.4
DNS 5.6.7.8
Thanks!
Sincerely,
Tony Gray
Network Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Intouch
To specify more than one DNS server in Junkmail:
- does it work properly?
- which would be the proper format:
DNS 1.2.3.4 5.6.7.8
...or
DNS 1.2.3.4
DNS 5.6.7.8
Declude JunkMail will actually only use one DNS server. If it doesn't
receive a response back in time, it will re-try the request.
I am seeing quite of few of these in the dec.log.
09/24/2002 00:22:48 Q127d011e02a48303 WARNING: DNS server 64.171.65.11
returned a SERVER FAILURE error for MX/A for dotcompselectronics.com.
09/24/2002 00:22:49 Q127d011e02a48303 R1 Message OK
09/24/2002 00:22:49 Q127d011e02a48303 R2 Message
I've been following this particular issue for months (just started on this mailing
list).
I've tried 3 different DNS servers (including one running on the same machine as
Declude) with no effect. Most of the failures appear to be legitimate badly
configured servers that the DNS server is
I've tried 3 different DNS servers (including one running on the same
machine as Declude) with no effect. Most of the failures appear to be
legitimate badly configured servers that the DNS server is reporting
incorrectly as a server failure to Declude.
Are you referring to remote DNS servers,
Hi Scott:
Take a look at
http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ptr.ch?ip=12.165.0.3
The result is:
12.165.0.3 PTR record: westcomail.westco.net.0.165.12.in-addr.arpa. [TTL =
86400 seconds]. You have one or more obviously bogus PTR records (pointing
to in-addr.arpa).
I believe the ACTUAL error is,
Is there a setting in the global.cfg to add a DNS server? Would it use this
server instead of the Imail settings?
Craig
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send
Scott:
in the past few days, I've again seen several false No Reverse DNS
reports. Each time I confirmed, that MS DNS was timing out on the reverse
DNS, even though it DOES exist. Clearing the cache in MS DNS resolves the
problem. So the underlying problem is of course Microsoft's.
However,
in the past few days, I've again seen several false No Reverse DNS
reports. Each time I confirmed, that MS DNS was timing out on the reverse
DNS, even though it DOES exist. Clearing the cache in MS DNS resolves the
problem. So the underlying problem is of course Microsoft's.
However, in the
101 - 191 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
