Bud Durland wrote:
There's been an almost hysterical reaction to the ICS announcement.
People have right to be angry disappointed over it; but traffic on
he iMail list almost seems like a knee-jerk reaction: Good lord
that's a lot of money -- I'm buying something else right now. If GM
All,
We're missing one huge point and that is why purchase support agreements
from Ipswitch.
Let's review.
1. To get phone support.
2. To get major software updates.
Everyone else keeps adding:
3. To get security hotfixes.
However, #3 is incorrect: From Ipswitch.com
Patches and Upgrades -
Hi Barry,
So you're recommendation for the moment is to keep on IMail
until you're ready with something else?
Is this the right way for the following
situation:
Running IMail unlimited and Declude Junkmail Pro and Virus
Pro.
What if we've out an offer for two other such boxes?
Beside
Markus Gufler wrote:
So you're recommendation for the moment is to keep on IMail until
you're ready with something else?
That's really the most common sense approach, isn't it?
There's been an almost hysterical reaction to the ICS announcement.
People have right to be angry disappointed over
There's been an almost hysterical reaction to the ICS announcement.
...
Yes I know that my server will not stop working a certain day only because
the SA expires.
But what if there will happen something like a new MS Update that I must
implement but will kill imail functionality. You know
on IPSwitches
part.
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bud Durland
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 11:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CBL:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS
Markus Gufler wrote:
So you're
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bud Durland
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 11:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CBL:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS
Markus Gufler wrote:
So you're recommendation for the moment is to keep on IMail until
you're ready
: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 2:35 PM
Subject: RE: CBL:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS
There's been an almost hysterical reaction to the ICS announcement.
...
Yes I know that my server will not stop working a certain day only because
the SA expires.
But what if there will happen
it will work in a high-volume
environment. And I think ME also has an Imail migration util.
PV
- Original Message -
From: sbsi lists [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mailing Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 4:28 PM
Subject: Re[2]: CBL:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch
Hey PV,
Thanks for the feedback.
My issue on changing - just like everyone else here - is that Declude
Junk/Virus is doing great for us and then moving to a new mail server
and just hoping it will work as they (the new vendor) say it will
... I don't believe it. Just looking at the screen
Thank you. That is excellent commentary and shows a reality
centered focus on the issues at hand.
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
sl So... I saw this link on the Ipswitch forums and it's a good read - I
sl don't think it's been
Message -
From: sbsi lists [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mailing Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 5:12 PM
Subject: Re[4]: CBL:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS
Hey PV,
Thanks for the feedback.
My issue on changing - just like everyone else here - is that Declude
Junk
On Tuesday, October 26, 2004, 8:25:58 PM, Mailing wrote:
ML No question that the built in spam and av protection for smartertools is
ML no-where close to Declude.
ML Their antispam is made of blacklists (you can add your own as well) and
ML bayesian which I really like, but that's it. The end
Jason,
I've been using both Mailenable Pro and SmarterMail so I'll give my input
and hope it helps.
Personally I would love to see Declude in both products and it seems
to be viable since both allow third party hooks (especially
mailenable.
sl Just looking at the screen shot for the
sl
14 matches
Mail list logo
