Mark,
That line looks just fine. I would spend some time trying to find if
there are any other duplicates lying around in both your Global.cfg and
JunkMail files. Also, in your Global.cfg file, make sure that you have
the following line:
XINHEADERX-Note: This E-mail was sent from
I don't know what it was but I had named the test REVDNS and it looked like
this:
REVDNS filter D:\REVDNS.txtx 0 0
This caused a dupe test and didn't work:
I then changed it to:
DNS filter D:\DNS.txt x 0 0
And the regular REVDNS test
I asked Ameritech - oops SBC to add a reverse dns entry for me, instead it
appears they have delegated rdns to me.
I tried http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ptr.ch?ip=65.42.199.3 to see what is
happening.
I don't quite understand the Got CNAME referral to ns2.ostgaard.com (zone
Thanks! got it working. Just never saw that before.
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 6:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Reverse dns help
I asked Ameritech - oops SBC to add a reverse dns entry
Do what I do I have
a rule defined that subtracts the points my REVDNS rule adds, and put the
domains I ned to get through in that list. Kind of clunky and mna-power
intensive, but it works for me. I couldnt imagine doing it for hundreds
of domains
Karl Drugge
1.) We are failing to receive mail from some places; one being
verizon and some within our group are questioning if Declude is
somehow preventing the mail from getting through. I do not think that
is the case.
This should be relatively easy to determine.
First, see if you can find the E-mail in
Murphy's Law -- as soon as I write to the list, I find the DNS prob.
One of my PTR records had a typo -- was PRE instead of PTR and that did it..
Donna
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Donna Walsh
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 3:58 PM
To:
Murphy's Law -- as soon as I write to the list, I find the DNS prob.
One of my PTR records had a typo -- was PRE instead of PTR and that did
it..
At least it is fixed. :))
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
Below is a header of an email processed by Declude today - it sees the RDNS
as:
202.112.78.63.in-addr.arpa [63.78.112.202]
However, your own http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ptr.ch?ip=63.78.112.202
correctly reports:
smtp.hhbrown.com.
Seems as if Declude doesn't follow the classless
I've just included the reverse DNS test WARN in the $default$.JunkMail file
later I received an email from a software vendor that had the X header
warning:
X-RBL-Warning: REVDNS: This E-mail was sent from a mail server 207.33.16.83
with no reverse DNS entry.
When I checked 207.33.16.83 using
: 17 May 2002 13:15
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Reverse DNS
I've just included the reverse DNS test WARN in the $default$.JunkMail
file later I received an email from a software vendor that had the X
header
warning:
X-RBL-Warning: REVDNS: This E-mail was sent from a mail
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Reverse DNS
I've just included the reverse DNS test WARN in the
$default$.JunkMail
file later I received an email from a software vendor that had the X
header
warning:
X-RBL-Warning: REVDNS: This E-mail was sent from a mail server
Our primary DNS is 213.210.8.110
That's the problem. You DNS server is saying that nothing exists (reverse
DNS lookups, MX record lookups, etc.). That's a serious problem that needs
to be fixed.
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R.
Scott Perry
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 9:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Reverse DNS
Our primary DNS is 213.210.8.110
That's the problem. You DNS server is saying that nothing
exists
PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 May 2002 14:20
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Reverse DNS
FWIW,
If that server is W2k and DNS was configured without an active Internet
connection, then DNS will not download the root servers and nothing will
work.
You might want to try un-installing
, 2002 9:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Reverse DNS
FWIW,
If that server is W2k and DNS was configured without an active Internet
connection, then DNS will not download the root servers and nothing will
work.
You might want to try un-installing the W2k DNS service and
re
We're not running win2k DNS, we're using Simply DNS. I am puzzled by this as
this DNS server is hosting 300-400 domains without any apparent problems. If
you run a DNS report agaisnt any of the hosted domains it responds
correctly.
The key is realizing that (like an SMTP server), DNS goes two
I does appear that that DNS isn't responding corectly, the other two are -
so thanks for the detective work. Now to find out why...
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 May 2002 14:37
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Reverse
Country: UNITED STATES
How I am searching:
Searching for 162.89.86.65.in-addr.arpa PTR at f.root-servers.net: Got
unknown result, sorry!
Thanks for pointing this out. We made a change yesterday to the DNS
engine, after discovering that it could leak handles (which may have
contributed to
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 04:50 PM
To: Andy Schmidt
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Reverse DNS Lookup.htm
Hello Andy,
DSL.net, Inc. (NETBLK-DSLNET-6) DSLNET-6 65.84.0.0 -
65.86.255.255
H M SYSTEMS SOFTWARE INC. (NETBLK-DSLNET-20020211-6)
DSLNET-20020211-6
I have been playing with my Declude settings only to realize my own reverse
DNS was not configured. My DNS provider told me that he can't provide
reverse DNS: in order to provide a reverse lookup, the nameservers have to
have a
delegation for the entire netblock that IP address resides in.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 2:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Reverse DNS
I have been playing with my Declude settings only to realize my
own reverse
. This isn't so difficult after all, why doesn't
everyone do it? :)
Keep up the good work.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 2:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail
Ok, thanks for the help Scott. I guess it is confusing to me.
That's OK -- DNS itself is tricky enough, but reverse DNS makes it much
more complex.
As long as I have a reverse DNS, it is compliant.
That's correct.
My first thought was that the reverse
DNS had to be for the same domain
24 matches
Mail list logo
