Folks,
Is there a test that can be based on the results of 2 or more other
specific tests? ex: an email that fails both HELOBOGUS and
BADHEADERS would fail HELOHEAD and have x number of points
added/deducted to it?
Thanks
Nick
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by
Is there a test that can be based on the results of 2 or more other
specific tests? ex: an email that fails both HELOBOGUS and
BADHEADERS would fail HELOHEAD and have x number of points
added/deducted to it?
No, that is not possible. It is something that has been requested, but it
looks like a
Is there a test that can be based on the results of 2 or more other
specific tests? ex: an email that fails both HELOBOGUS and
BADHEADERS would fail HELOHEAD and have x number of points
added/deducted to it?
No, that is not possible. It is something that has been requested, but it
looks
]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test based on results of other tests
Is there a test that can be based on the results of 2 or more other
specific tests? ex: an email that fails both HELOBOGUS and
BADHEADERS would fail HELOHEAD and have x number of points
added/deducted
Actually, it could be a minor change to the processing -- at the
$default$.junkmaillevel, rather than global.cfg -- as this is not a
test, but a handling of the test results. It would mean order dependence,
usually (or the processing of combining tests done first, then other
handling done).
Actually, it could be a minor change to the processing -- at the
$default$.junkmaillevel, rather than Global.cfg -- as this is not a
test, but a handling of the test results. It would mean order
dependence,
usually (or the processing of combining tests done first, then other
handling
You actually
reminded me of how complex this would be. Both the Global.cfg and
appropriate .junkmail file would have to be loaded into memory, some tests
run, consult the files, other tests run, consult the files, final
tests run, consult the files and so forth.
You are trying to make this
I'm with you on how this would be accomplished, though it would
probably be a somewhat laborious rewrite in how scoring was handled in
comparison to how it is handled now. Just guessing of course.
This was actually my first feature request to Scott after purchasing
the application some time
Shoot, my link got munged. Here's what I was really talking about:
Are patent methods patently absurd?
http://news.com.com/2100-1023-962182.html
"
The patent office has granted patents for side-to-side
swinging on a swing set and for making a peanut butter and jelly
sandwich without
a crust."
Shoot, my link got munged. Here's what I was really talking about:
Are patent methods patently absurd?
http://news.com.com/2100-1023-962182.html
"
The patent office has granted patents for side-to-side
swinging on a swing set and for making a peanut butter and jelly
sandwich without
a crust."
10 matches
Mail list logo