RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test based on results of other tests

2003-09-03 Thread Nick Hayer
Folks, Is there a test that can be based on the results of 2 or more other specific tests? ex: an email that fails both HELOBOGUS and BADHEADERS would fail HELOHEAD and have x number of points added/deducted to it? Thanks Nick --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test based on results of other tests

2003-09-03 Thread R. Scott Perry
Is there a test that can be based on the results of 2 or more other specific tests? ex: an email that fails both HELOBOGUS and BADHEADERS would fail HELOHEAD and have x number of points added/deducted to it? No, that is not possible. It is something that has been requested, but it looks like a

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test based on results of other tests

2003-09-03 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Is there a test that can be based on the results of 2 or more other specific tests? ex: an email that fails both HELOBOGUS and BADHEADERS would fail HELOHEAD and have x number of points added/deducted to it? No, that is not possible. It is something that has been requested, but it looks

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test based on results of other tests

2003-09-03 Thread Karen D. Oland
] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test based on results of other tests Is there a test that can be based on the results of 2 or more other specific tests? ex: an email that fails both HELOBOGUS and BADHEADERS would fail HELOHEAD and have x number of points added/deducted

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test based on results of other tests

2003-09-03 Thread Karen D. Oland
Actually, it could be a minor change to the processing -- at the $default$.junkmaillevel, rather than global.cfg -- as this is not a test, but a handling of the test results. It would mean order dependence, usually (or the processing of combining tests done first, then other handling done).

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test based on results of other tests

2003-09-03 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Actually, it could be a minor change to the processing -- at the $default$.junkmaillevel, rather than Global.cfg -- as this is not a test, but a handling of the test results. It would mean order dependence, usually (or the processing of combining tests done first, then other handling

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test based on results of other tests

2003-09-03 Thread Karen D. Oland
You actually reminded me of how complex this would be. Both the Global.cfg and appropriate .junkmail file would have to be loaded into memory, some tests run, consult the files, other tests run, consult the files, final tests run, consult the files and so forth. You are trying to make this

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Test based on results of other tests

2003-09-03 Thread Matthew Bramble
I'm with you on how this would be accomplished, though it would probably be a somewhat laborious rewrite in how scoring was handled in comparison to how it is handled now. Just guessing of course. This was actually my first feature request to Scott after purchasing the application some time

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Test based on results of other tests

2003-09-03 Thread Matthew Bramble
Shoot, my link got munged. Here's what I was really talking about: Are patent methods patently absurd? http://news.com.com/2100-1023-962182.html " The patent office has granted patents for side-to-side swinging on a swing set and for making a peanut butter and jelly sandwich without a crust."

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Test based on results of other tests

2003-09-03 Thread Matthew Bramble
Shoot, my link got munged. Here's what I was really talking about: Are patent methods patently absurd? http://news.com.com/2100-1023-962182.html " The patent office has granted patents for side-to-side swinging on a swing set and for making a peanut butter and jelly sandwich without a crust."