[Declude.JunkMail] Archive?

2002-06-20 Thread Bill Landry
Is there an archive of the JunkMail and Virus lists? I wanted to search on some of the supposedly "undocumented" features of Declude JM like "adult", "heuristics", and possibly any others that I am not aware of. Or, is there list of these undocumented features somewhere that I can review?

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Archive?

2002-06-20 Thread R. Scott Perry
Is there an archive of the JunkMail and Virus lists? Yes -- at http://www.mail-archive.com . I wanted to search on some of the supposedly undocumented features of Declude JM like adult, heuristics, and possibly any others that I am not aware of. Or, is there list of these undocumented

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Archive?

2002-06-20 Thread Bill Beach
Is there an archive of the JunkMail and Virus lists? http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.virus%40declude.com/ http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail%40declude.com/ -b --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Archive?

2002-06-20 Thread Bill Landry
Thanks Scott and Bill for the pointers to the archives. Scott, I've asked this a couple of time, but have not gotten a response from anyone on the list. Is there an adult test that can be run with JM or not? Thanks, Bill -Original Message- From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Archive?

2002-06-20 Thread R. Scott Perry
Thanks Scott and Bill for the pointers to the archives. Scott, I've asked this a couple of time, but have not gotten a response from anyone on the list. Is there an adult test that can be run with JM or not? There is an undocumented adult test. It is an undocumented and unsupported test.

[Declude.JunkMail] Coldfusion Declude front end?

2002-06-20 Thread Matt Robertson
Has anyone tried putting a web-based front end on Declude? I just upgraded to JunkMail Pro and am looking for something in ColdFusion. Don't want to have to write it myself if I can avoid it. --Matt Robertson-- MSB Designs, Inc. http://mysecretbase.com --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Archive?

2002-06-20 Thread Bill Landry
Is there some reason you are being vague about this, Scott? No problem, as a paying customer of both Declude JunkMail Pro and Virus Pro, I will figure it out myself and let others know who might ask the same question in the future know how to setup the test. Bill -Original Message-

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Archive?

2002-06-20 Thread R. Scott Perry
Is there some reason you are being vague about this, Scott? Because it is intentionally unsupported and undocumented. I've probably spent several hours supporting this feature, and it's starting to defeat the point of an unsupported and undocumented feature. It's a choice of leaving the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Archive?

2002-06-20 Thread Charles Frolick
The adult test has very few hits, even for blatantly adult emails. Probably one out of every 15-20 porn ads gets caught, and I subscribe to some joke lists with frequent crude jokes, and they are rarely tagged. The idea about using the FILTER test with a well designed filter will probably be

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] @ and . in Kill File

2002-06-20 Thread R. Scott Perry
~mail.com something4 ~ character represents @ or . or Blank ~mail.* looks for . or @ mail.com or mail.net This way we don't have to place multiple instances of each name in the list. This has been added to the suggestion database.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Coldfusion Declude front end?

2002-06-20 Thread Matt Robertson
I figured as much ;D. I know I saw someone post about this awhile back, saying they either had something or were developing it. --- Matt Robertson[EMAIL PROTECTED] MSB Designs, Inc., www.mysecretbase.com ---

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: M$ Service Packs

2002-06-20 Thread Mark Smith
Title: Message The General rule of thumb is that anytime NT asks you for the original CD you need to re-apply the service pack. The bad thing is that you probably need to re-apply all Post SP6a hotfixes (including IIS Nimda fixes, etc). My suggestion: W2k. You can build a W2k CD and fuse

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: M$ Service Packs

2002-06-20 Thread Mark Smith
Title: Message TCP/IP Printing allows you to print to LPR/LPD (Jet Direct) ports without the Jet Direct software. But I believe that it also might be required in NT 4.0 for web printing. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: M$ Service Packs

2002-06-20 Thread John Tolmachoff
Title: Message My bad, TCP/IP Printing is for the LPD service and for Unix. I was thinking of something else. John Tolmachoff IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Declude.JunkMail] BLARSBL:Time Msg Processed : ms ?? (like DEBUG log)

2002-06-20 Thread Roger Heath
I have seen others ask about this here and I am curious if any such feature was done..??? where %TIMEINOUT% or some variable that is the milliseconds of Declude processing time, normally seen in the DEBUG logging mode. This would be a nice quality control feature for JunkMail

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Time Msg Processed : ms ?? (like DEBUGlog)

2002-06-20 Thread R. Scott Perry
I have seen others ask about this here and I am curious if any such feature was done..??? where %TIMEINOUT% or some variable that is the milliseconds of Declude processing time, normally seen in the DEBUG logging mode. This would be a nice quality control feature for JunkMail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: M$ Service Packs

2002-06-20 Thread John Tolmachoff
Title: Message Please note, Qchain is a known flop, even admitted by some in MS. Only works some of the time. John Tolmachoff IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Declude.JunkMail] Filter question

2002-06-20 Thread Rick Davidson
How would I go about filtering for this in the header? Is it possible? To: Undisclosed Recipients Have a great day! Rick Davidson Buckeye Internet Services www.buckeyeweb.com 440-953-1900 - --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail

IPWHOIS:Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] IP Blakclist

2002-06-20 Thread Eje Gustafsson
Talk about that.. 205.244.69.0/24 207.33.16.0/24 216.129.173.70/32 216.15.250.0/23 216.33.87.128/26 64.158.28.0/25 64.159.91.197/32 64.32.34.128/25 64.49.220.128/25 64.5.230.0/24 66.115.47.0/24 66.185.166.0/25 66.35.193.0/24 80.64.131.0/25 Is my ip blacklist that I used in Imail klist BUT after

IPWHOIS:Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Minus One Address.

2002-06-20 Thread Eje Gustafsson
No I told you to leave them on ;) j/k Thursday, June 20, 2002, 00:56:42 AM, you wrote: alltel.net is a isp and cellphone service provider. They provide dialup access and in some areas even DSL access. A competitor of ours so just leave them on the list ;P T @alltel.net T Sorry about

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter question

2002-06-20 Thread R. Scott Perry
How would I go about filtering for this in the header? Is it possible? To: Undisclosed Recipients It isn't currently possible in Declude JunkMail. It most likely will be possible in an upcoming release, though. However, you should note that Undisclosed Recipients is used by many legitimate

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] IP Blakclist

2002-06-20 Thread R. Scott Perry
Also CAN oen do as with the fromfile add a comment after the ip ? because as it is today I have NO idea why I choose to block all of the above :( With the fromfile test type, you can add text that will be used as part of the warning message. For example: 192.168.131.0/25This

IPWHOIS:Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Coldfusion Declude front end?

2002-06-20 Thread Eje Gustafsson
Always been thinking about doing a simple thing in php so my users can enable/disable it and maybe set levels. But to much to do with to little time. Thursday, June 20, 2002, 15:22:22 PM, you wrote: WOD If you write one i'd love to see it too! ( CF dude) WOD - Original Message - WOD

[Declude.JunkMail] The nerve!

2002-06-20 Thread Rick Davidson
Subject: Fw: $7,500 Unsecured Platinum Credit Limit!! From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Comment: ~ This email has been requested by a user on your network and Comment: ~ has not been sent unsolicited. If the user does not recall Comment: ~ requesting this email then another user has

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Comment after whitelist ip entry?

2002-06-20 Thread Bill Landry
That will work. Thanks! Bill -Original Message- From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 12:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Comment after whitelist ip entry? Is it okay to place a comment after a whitelist ip entry

RE:[Declude.JunkMail] Minus One Address.

2002-06-20 Thread Tom
alltel.net is a isp and cellphone service provider. They provide dialup access and in some areas even DSL access. A competitor of ours so just leave them on the list ;P T @alltel.net T Sorry about that, it will be removed from the list. No I told you to leave them on ;) j/k I'd rather

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 2NP.NET

2002-06-20 Thread R. Scott Perry
ACan anyone tell me how this e-mail got through if .2NP.NET is in the Kill List? Did I miss something? .2np.net 04042002-000 Is that a space before the .2np.net? That could prevent the test from working. -Scott --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses

[Declude.JunkMail]

2002-06-20 Thread David Stavert
I still find it very easy to get the X-RCPT-TO: pick up a chunk of the $junkmail file as in this header when I use ROUTETO. Thanks David Received: from hotmail.com [216.33.241.15] by mx2.netraprise.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-7.10) id A7A8A201FE; Thu, 20 Jun 2002 18:39:20 -0500 Received: from

Re: [Declude.JunkMail]

2002-06-20 Thread R. Scott Perry
I still find it very easy to get the X-RCPT-TO: pick up a chunk of the $junkmail file as in this header when I use ROUTETO. Any chance of getting this to occur while the debug mode is being used (LOGLEVEL DEBUG)? That would definitely help in tracking down the problem.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] More Addresses

2002-06-20 Thread Tom
Here are some more spam addresses I checked and found not to be an ISP or MAIL SERVER. However, I did not put this in my list yet nor did I check it for duplicates. [USE this List at your own risk] @winxpnews.com .transcentives.net .lifeminders.com @scicmail.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]