Hello!
I use JunkMail Pro 1.70 beta on several domains, with one directory for
each spam filtered domain under \IMail\Declude\:
oslonett.no
nutripharma.com
cartoon-links.com
etc.
These directories have a $default$.JunkMail file, with the first line saying
REDIRECT @domain.tld
Any chance that SPAMDOMAINS can have three entries. MSN uses Qwest DSL
in my neighbourhood.
Is there another way to handle this?
That's something that we are looking into.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail
The problem is: REDIRECT doesn't seem to work in the $default$.JunkMail
files. However, it works fine in username.domain.tld.JunkMail files.
You may already know this, but just in case: The REDIRECT command will
only work in the configuration file that Declude JunkMail uses for a
recipient.
R. Scott Perry wrote:
The problem is: REDIRECT doesn't seem to work in the
$default$.JunkMail files. However, it works fine in
username.domain.tld.JunkMail files.
You may already know this, but just in case: The REDIRECT command will
only work in the configuration file that Declude JunkMail
We have a \IMail\Declude\$default$.JunkMail file that basically ignores
all spam tests. Then, for customers who want spam filtering, we have
IMail\Declude\domain1.tld, \IMail\Declude\domain2.tld etc.
What I would recommend that you try in this case is to have the REDIRECT
lines in the
I just implemented the SPAMDOMAINS test this
weekend and it appears to be working fine.
I have having onesmall problem thought.
One of our domain names - updategraphiCS.com is getting flagged:
X-RBL-Warning: SPAMDOMAINS: Spamdomain 'cs,com'
found...
How can I get around this ??
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 08:11:55 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] question about filters
And wouldn't it be an IP address and/or a in-addr.arpa PTR when they connect?
No reverse DNS entry
Any more thought
given to this feature request?
This will
whitelist a message if it is only to the postmaster or root. If there are any
other recipients, it is processed as normal.
Also, WHITELIST
ABUSEONLY would be nice.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices
Any more thought given to this feature request?
This will whitelist a message if it is only to the postmaster or root. If
there are any other recipients, it is processed as normal.
Also, WHITELIST ABUSEONLY would be nice.
It's something that we are looking into. Right now, our top priority is
It depends on
which you are testing, what rule you might want to use. since outgoing mail
uses different processing rules (in global.cfg, instead of junkmail), you
can hold on fails for incoming and ignore outgoing, if you group them into
one rule file, correct Scott?
Correct.
Again, REDIRECT works fine in username.JunkMail files, but not in
$default$.JunkMail. Might it be a bug in 1.70 beta?
It looks like you are correct that there is a bug in the 1.70 beta. There
is an interim release 1.70i20 at
http://www.declude.com/release/170i/declude.exe that should take
Here is an app I just turned on line and my users love it they get a daily
email report of the email that have been held on the server for them. It
could not be any easier. Also a raw copy of the email is sent to the mail
administrator for analyzing. This is passive for the email account if they
I would be interested in seeing this.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 9:41 AM
To:
I remember a previous discussion regarding someone creating and maintaining
an sd.txt file for everyone to use. Did that ever occur? Does anyone have a
sd.txt file they would be willing to share?
Thank you,
Bill Newberg
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
I am getting a page not found when going to DNASTUFF and DNSREPORT
It was down for a few minutes, but it's back online now.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses
I am getting a page not found when going to DNASTUFF and DNSREPORT
Other surfing is OK.
Kevin Bilbee
Network Administrator
Standard Abrasives, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(805) 520-5800 x7332
Changing the way industry works.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for
My appologies for posting to the wrong
listSometimes autocomplete has its disadvantages.
The change to .cs.com from cs.com appears to have worked.
Thank you.
J
- Original Message -
From:
Jason
Newland
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 4:39 PM
Title: Message
Hi
Scott:
Any chance for a
quick test for blank bodies?
It seems like a
lot of emails are being sent by spammers to test the validity of the emails with
blank bodies.
Today we have
received over 20 or so...
The bodies are all
blank with no code or any html tags..
Any chance for a quick test for blank bodies?
It seems like a lot of emails are being sent by spammers to test the
validity of the emails with blank bodies.
Today we have received over 20 or so...
The bodies are all blank with no code or any html tags.. absolutely
blank. It seems like this
This should be posted to the Declude JunkMail
list. You should not enter your own domains in the SpamDomain.txt file
that you are referencing.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Jeff
Pereira
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 1:00 PM
Subject:
Sender domain is same as mine .
Sender is my e-mail .
Which test or filter will fit best for this .
i have already 2 or 3 in mind but i wanted to have your ideas also.
Regards
Rifat levis
---BeginMessage---
21 matches
Mail list logo
