RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Message routing question

2004-03-09 Thread Nathan Fouarge
I believe that by default Imail puts [EMAIL PROTECTED] to folder anything in the mailbox of [EMAIL PROTECTED] I know you can change this behaviour, but I do not know where of hand. Nate -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Doherty Sent:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Message routing question

2004-03-09 Thread Dave Doherty
I think so, yes. Thanks! -Dave - Original Message - From: Lyndon Eaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 11:20 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Message routing question Its the OE Rule you need to re-write. With the later versions of OE you have

[Declude.JunkMail] Per User Whitelisting Options

2004-03-09 Thread David Sullivan
I'm working on a white list solution to allow per user white listing based on the sender/sending domain. My setup is primarily as Store and Forward for another server. I have about 500 domains with about 20,000 users doing 300k msgs per day. Redirecting looks like a nice option but I'm a bit

[Declude.JunkMail] Why did this get through?

2004-03-09 Thread Timothy Bohen
Any help on why this got through? I see the line about being whitelisted but I cannot find this ip or domain in my whitelist? Thanks Received: from dynamic-ip-cr20011851123.cable.net.co [200.118.51.123] by mail1.cmsinter.net (SMTPD32-8.05) id A5B951D700C0; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 11:50:01 -0500

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Per User Whitelisting Options

2004-03-09 Thread Kornitz, David
Here's the problems I have run into setting up an External Plus Test: 1. Declude only uses tests the external plus test 1 time for each message. a. Using %ALLRECIPS% can cause problems when there is a larger number of recipients. Some of the parameters may not be passed

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Why did this get through?

2004-03-09 Thread Adrian Titei
You must have a line like WHITELIST HABEAS in your global.cfg. That's responsible for letting it through. Adrian Timothy Bohen wrote: Any help on why this got through? I see the line about being whitelisted but I cannot find this ip or domain in my whitelist? Thanks Received: from

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Why did this get through?

2004-03-09 Thread Timothy Bohen
Yep thatÂ’s there. I don't ever remember putting it in though. Does it come with a default global.cfg file? What is it? Thanks -- Original Message -- From: Adrian Titei [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 13:14:51 -0500

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Why did this get through?

2004-03-09 Thread R. Scott Perry
Yep that's there. I don't ever remember putting it in though. Does it come with a default global.cfg file? Yes, WHITELIST HABEAS came with the default global.cfg file for quite some time. Since a spammer decided to risk getting sued by infringing on the Habeas legal rights, we are

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Why did this get through?

2004-03-09 Thread Adrian Titei
I am not absolutely sure, but I think that it is in the default file. To find out more about HABEAS, go to www.habeas.com. It's supposed to be some kind of certificate for non-spam mail. It is supposed to work, but obviously there are some who abuse it and they're being sued... Cheers, Adrian

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Per User Whitelisting Options

2004-03-09 Thread David Sullivan
Hello David, Tuesday, March 9, 2004, 1:06:42 PM, you wrote: KDa. Using %ALLRECIPS% can cause problems when there is a larger KD number of recipients. Some of the parameters may not be passed KD or may be are stripped off due to limitations of the length of a KD command

[Declude.JunkMail] How can I catch this with Declude?

2004-03-09 Thread John Carter
Just was looking a drug spam that came through with a weight of 12 (failing SORBS-DUHL and CMDSPACE). I know many of you have seen this (which is why I asking for help.) It had the standard random gibberish of correctly spelled words, but making no sense -- I guess to throw phrase analysis. Ex.:

RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Per User Whitelisting Options

2004-03-09 Thread Kornitz, David
KD I have written an external test that at the domain level allows KD the administrator decide whether the domain or user level KD has priority when whitelisting or blacklisting. What's your logic in that? The idea is the following: A specific company has certain organization that

[Declude.JunkMail] BONDEDSENDER

2004-03-09 Thread Frederick Samarelli
Does anyone have any recent thoughts (Pros and Cons) toward BONDEDSENDER. Fred --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] BONDEDSENDER

2004-03-09 Thread Scott Fisher
I haven't received many False positives (false negatives in this case?) on the test. It seems to help lower the scores on some of the legitimate optin mail that falls into the grey area (travelocity, cnn, about.com, dowjones.com, ebay, fedex, Motley Fool, Southwest, United, VH1) that may be

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Bonded senders

2004-03-09 Thread Dan Geiser
Paul, Here's what Cyan said about a month ago... - From: Cyan Callihan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 13:19:07 -0800 Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] BONDEDSENDER, spam hit on Virtumundo Please send all of your complaints...to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I will investigate.

[Declude.JunkMail] Default Junkmail settings

2004-03-09 Thread Joe Raykiewicz
Is the $default.junkmail and global.cfg files that come with Junkmail the recommended settings? Is this what I should use for my installation? I have it setup and have been playing with all the settings, basically tinkering to learn. Thanks, Joe

[Declude.JunkMail] Question about these headers....

2004-03-09 Thread Bennie
Hello all, I just received an email with the following headers... Received: from mx1.myoffer2u.com [205.138.96.41] by mail.pepperlink.net with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id A8B120AA00BA; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 17:44:01 -0500 Received: from centramedia.net (205.138.96.41) by mx1.myoffer2u.com (PowerMTA(TM)

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Question about these headers....

2004-03-09 Thread Matt
The first message's source is well listed and should have been tagged better if your tests were in the default configuration, and many would probably have thrown every more at it. http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ip4r.ch?ip=205.138.96.41 The second E-mail looks to be severely munged and has no

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Default Junkmail settings

2004-03-09 Thread Matt
Joe, It's the natural place to start, and for those that want to get deeper into things, there's plenty of potential for improvement. Keep tinkering, that's the best way to learn as there is no single best formula on how to configure Declude. Matt Joe Raykiewicz wrote: Is the