Hi,
Get the UnixTools for Windows http://unxutils.sourceforge.net/ and use all
the Unix commands you've always wanted in a Windows environment. ;-)
Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
- Original Message -
From: Roderick A. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
I am currently running declude
v1.76 and want to upgrade.
I only see v1.75 and beta v1.79 available, anyone know if
there is a better full blown version of declude
available.
I have updated my global.cfg
$default$.junkmail to add some additional ip4r tests,
cmdspace and WHITELIST
We are seeing more spam getting
throughtriggering very few test. We have a secondary spam system and it
has a test called RCVD_FAKE_IP that is rated at 80% ofits hold
weight. Does Declude have something similar to this that I
amnot familiar with it?
Here is the header from an email that
Thanks for everyone's help yesterday and the day before with all my SPF
questions and issues.
The bottom line is, the email I have attached, failed the tests it was
supposed to fail, including the spf test, as this particular email did NOT
come from my mail server or my domain.
Matter of fact,
The web site shows the correct versions
available. To see what was added for each beta version, read the release notes
linked at the bottom of the manual.
Declude is trying hard to get a new
release version out, hopefully soon.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices
Yeah a real pain. My concern is mostly last July's logs getting written
over or blended with this years. If they are uniquely named then no
issue. A dribble of the previous days data in the next or previous
days data isn't an issue for me.
Thanks for the thoughts.
Rod
--
Roderick A.
Thanks. I've been looking at them but since I have perl on the systems
most everything I need it there.
Bonno Bloksma wrote:
Hi,
Get the UnixTools for Windows http://unxutils.sourceforge.net/ and use all
the Unix commands you've always wanted in a Windows environment. ;-)
Met vriendelijke
Thanks for the reply John,
I guess I must have a beta version as
well, anyone know if CMDSPACE and/or WHITELIST AUTH will work with 1.76?
C:\IMaildeclude -diag
Declude 1.76b (C) Copyright 2000-2003 Computerized Horizons. All Rights Reserve
d.
Diagnostics ON (Declude
v1.76b).
From the release notes:
cmdspace in the 1.78
Whitelist auth in the 1.76 (IMail v8 and later).
Scott Fisher
Director of IT
Farm Progress Companies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/01/04 12:22PM
Thanks for the reply John,
I guess I must have a beta version as well, anyone know if CMDSPACE
and/or
Title: Message
Hi
Todd:
It's
this line that the other test is checking:
Received: from 65.16.167.134 ([211.249.122.134])
It
discovers that the other side was using YOUR servers IP address in its own HELO
string.
I'm
pretty certain that the "HELOVALID" test in declude will catch that.
HELO 4STARTSWITH [
You do not want to apply weight if the HELO string is an IP address the helo
string being in the format of [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx] is a vaild helo as long as
it is the ip address of the sending server.
HELO 8STARTSWITH 65.16.167.
I would definitly suggest doing
I hold mail if the HELO matches my servers IP address, is there a situation
I am overlooking where this would be a bad idea?
Rick Davidson
National Systems Manager
North American Title Group
-
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Bilbee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
I'm with you 100%. Sorry for the confusion, that was actually Andy's
filter line and I didn't mean to say it was wrong, just not how I
approach it. There is software out there for sending bulk-mail,
primarily from PC's I believe and some server scripts that will bracket
the IP as the HELO. I
13 matches
Mail list logo
