It happend to us on our 7.13 installation, we had to uninstall the
update to get the IMail interface back to something usable. Not clever.
IMail have confirmed to me that this is a problem and suggested the
removal of Q328310, whether this is a problem with IMail or MS I know
not - no other apps
Hi,
Many people, including me, have asked IpSwitch to do something like
this. Also because declude does NOT get called when e-mail in
entered using the web interface.
I have Declude scanning all mail using an undocumented technique. I
will post it, if you promise not to ask
Scott,
In response to additional info and questions please see below. When
could we anticipate an ETA?
Snippet Is this something that others would find useful? It
definitely would be
easier for us to implement.
***Regarding end user spam control via e-mail subscribe method. This
would be a
In response to additional info and questions please see below. When
could we anticipate an ETA?
It's too early for an ETA, sorry.
***Regarding end user spam control via e-mail subscribe method. This
would be a nice option, but I would prefer Web interface for our
customers and ability to
I just think this is funny - I increased helobogus, mailfrom and revdns to
a weight of 7 and I have a message subject marked as [SPAM] when it hits a
weight of 20...
guess I should lower two of them Any suggestions? Maybe I'll lower
REVDNS by 2.
-RBL-Warning: HELOBOGUS: Domain
Actually, it looks like there may be a hiccup occurring with the primary
mail server.
ERROR: I could not connect to one or more of your mailservers:
mail.declude.com: Timed out
Actually, I can guarantee that mail.declude.com was up at least a few
seconds before the E-mail was received, since
on 12/18/02 8:43 AM, R. Scott Perry wrote:
Both methods may be a possibility. However, the web interface would take
priority, unless it seemed that the E-mail option would be useful to a lot
of people.
How are subscribers going to log into a web interface? Won't they need a
password of some
How are subscribers going to log into a web interface? Won't they need a
password of some type to verify they are who they say they are? Will they
need another password or will they be able to use their IMail password and
Declude would tap into the IMail database to verify the password?
They
Valid emails are being caught by Declude Virus:
Virus Name.: [Conflicting Encoding Vulnerability]
This seems to happen when someone forwards a good html formatted email.
It's a big issue here because we send out html formatted invoices via
email and they're ending up in the virus directory when
Valid emails are being caught by Declude Virus:
Virus Name.: [Conflicting Encoding Vulnerability]
This seems to happen when someone forwards a good html formatted email.
It's a big issue here because we send out html formatted invoices via
email and they're ending up in the virus directory
Being that it is obviously a Windows application, would it
not make more sense to simply publish a configuration API (object), and
let the users decide what sort of interface they want to use to connect
to it?
At 08:43 AM 12/18/2002, R. Scott Perry wrote:
In
response to additional info and
Being that it is obviously a Windows application, would it not make more
sense to simply publish a configuration API (object), and let the users
decide what sort of interface they want to use to connect to it?
That's already there -- the configuration files are plain text files, and
can be
I looked up the failed code for spamheaders and it said it failed because of
a bad from header.
The problem is with this header:
From: bob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The issue is that there is no space or tab between the second quotation
mark and the . Although a very thorough reading of the
You are correct that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not a valid email address because
I changed it for privacy reasons. At any rate I didn't change the spacing
from the original header so the problem remains the same. We do have a
webpage that has our email addresses on it but this just launches the
default
That's already there -- the configuration files are plain text files, and
can be accessed with ASP, PHP, proprietary interface, etc. :)
I'm not sure if the advantages of an API (not having to deal with the text
files directly) would outweigh the disadvantages (less flexibility).
A Hotfix to the IMail software is available from
http://ipswitch.com/Support/IMail/patch-upgrades.html that will correct the
display issue.
- Original Message -
From: John Tolmachoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 7:54 PM
Subject: RE:
Hi,
That's already there -- the configuration files are plain text files, and
can be accessed with ASP, PHP, proprietary interface, etc. :)
I'm not sure if the advantages of an API (not having to deal with the
text
files directly) would outweigh the disadvantages (less flexibility).
However, as a school I would simply enforce the spam control and too bad
some legitimate mail gets caught. I will have a look at those mails once or
twice a week and forward them if they seem legit. For THAT I would like a
simple to use tool, either a small web interface or a gui tool to quickly
Great a patch for a very old issue is going to cost me $600 to get a new
service agreement for other upgrades I didin't want. (Still running
6.06, patch is for 7.13, funny how ver.7 has had 13 revisions and no
where near ver.8, ver.6 only needed 6)
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original
I am having a small problem. One company sends an email to my mail server.
They get a return that says it is an unknown user.. They answer an email we
send them. They get it back with unknown user. I gave them a completely
different address. Mine. One time it goes through and never again. I
I have Declude scanning all mail using an undocumented technique. I
will post it, if you promise not to ask Scott directly (seriously).
Please pretty please.
The reason Declude cannot scan mail sent from IWEBMSG is that IWEBMSG
uses IMAIL1 to encode messages, and IMAIL1 is hard-coded to
I am having a small problem. One company sends an email to my mail server.
They get a return that says it is an unknown user.. They answer an email we
send them. They get it back with unknown user. I gave them a completely
different address. Mine. One time it goes through and never again.
Thanks...that explains why...DNS has been bouncing and the great ISP has
killed the backup servers...oh well, back to the drawing board!
Jim Rooth
KLOTRON,INC.
Office: 817.654.3018.103
Home: 972.606.6341
Mobile: 214.244.0979
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
We already assign weights to SPAMHEADERS, BADHEADERS, BASE64, etc etc
However we would like to do something that may be a bit unique.
If a message matches SNIFFER SPAMHEADERS, we would like to just delete it.
Can we combine tests and create a new action off of that?
Thanks
---
[This
We already assign weights to SPAMHEADERS, BADHEADERS, BASE64, etc etc
However we would like to do something that may be a bit unique.
If a message matches SNIFFER SPAMHEADERS, we would like to just delete it.
Can we combine tests and create a new action off of that?
That's isn't
The program alias could be used effectively if it were a web generated email
message. It could be hosted on another machine/os/programming language etc
if it were all handled as a program alias.
Create a couple of examples and Administrators could modify to their hearts
content.
David
Could we
Not really. It could use Declude Confirm. Fill out a page add your email
address. The web page mails a confirmation (make sure this is what you want)
and mail it back to start the process. No login required.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Why not weight those 2 tests so that it will be deleted?
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott
Nobody seems to have acknowledged my message about REDIRECTing to
PLAN.IMA for per-user actions, but I am using the method with great
success to provide user self-management from *within* IMail Web
Messaging. If I, no JavaScript guru, can do it, surely others could
go this or similar
29 matches
Mail list logo
