I for one am quite happy with the workaround for TESTSFAILED/END. I can't
speak to which versions should support it, but with Matt's guidance and the
permutation builder I posted here yesterday:
http://www.subterrane.com/permgen.shtml
I've found remarkable precision and dexterity. Just be sure
Dan,
While it certainly works, it does require extra filters because the AND
kludge only works when the tests appear in a certain order. It would
be nice if that issue was solved, but for now, with a bit of extra
work, it's certainly an improvement and brings important new
capabilities to the
What a bunch of idgets
http://money.cnn.com/2004/05/19/technology/ftc_spam/index.htm
--
=
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/
=
---
[This E-mail
I have a better idea. Make the spammers put the word SPAM at the
beginning of the subject line (regardless of content) then it would make
it really easy for filters..
All I have to say is this is going to be very usefulNOT
Goran Jovanovic
The LAN Shoppe
OK if I have a test defined in the GLOBAL.CFG and I have per-domain
configs and if I only add the line
TESTNAME WARN (or whatever)
In only one domain's $default$.junkmail file
1) Will the test be executed for each e-mail for every domain or only
the tests listed in that domains .junkmail
I know I saw something about this a few days ago but am not sure what
the answer was. Is the www.dnsstuff.com website down for good? Is
there a new link to it?
Thanks
Sam
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the
I always though it would be much easier to track down spammers if the ISPs
would stop terminating the service of the known spammers that they have on
their networks and instead allow them to continue to keep the same IP
addresses. That way the list of IP addresses of known spammers would not be
I have been using the backup.dnsstuff.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bridges,
Samantha
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 11:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DNSstuff Website
I know I saw something about this a few
Scott or anyone who can help -
Below is the headers from a spam message. The Declude headers say that
it failed the Weight 10 test. I have a HOLD on Weight 10 in my
$default$.junkmail file. If I have a HOLD on the weight 10 then why did
it get through.
Thanks,
Samantha
Microsoft Mail
THANKS!
-Original Message-
From: Rick Baranowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 2:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DNSstuff Website
I have been using the backup.dnsstuff.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have been using the backup.dnsstuff.com
But is it gone and they just forgot to whack the backup? dnsreport.com was (is?) the
best dns report on the planet.
--
---
Matt Robertson, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MSB Designs, Inc. http://mysecretbase.com
I used it today and it worked just fine. Remember Scott is not available to
answer these kinds of questions this week.
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rick Baranowski
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 11:36 AM
To: [EMAIL
My best guess is - Chuck Berry - whoever now own Declude can't
fix it. Scott is on a cruise. No internet. No phone. When Scott
returns he will reboot the box - for now we just have to make do..
-Nick Hayer
On 20 May 2004 at 11:45, Matt Robertson wrote:
I have been using the
On 20 May 2004 at 14:46, Goran Jovanovic GJovanovic wrote:
Goran,
Since this has not been answered someone lower on the food chain [me]
will give it a try
On 20 May 2004 at 13:57, Goran Jovanovic wrote:
OK if I have a test defined in the GLOBAL.CFG and I have per-domain
configs and if I
Nick wrote:
Scott is on a cruise. No internet. No phone.
Ugh. Don't say that. I'm going to Cabo for two weeks next month - first vacation in
years - and I am absolutely *praying* that the place we're going is wired up, in case
of exactly this kind of scenario.
I have a Plan B (int'l
Thanks everyone!
Scott really really deserves that cruise...but I miss him.
Does anyone know what happened to www.dnsreport.com? I tried
backup.dnsreport.comnothin'.
Thanks
Sam
-Original Message-
From: Nick Hayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 2:53 PM
My plan B in those situations is another tech who's still on site :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Robertson
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 3:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DNSstuff Website
Nick wrote:
Hey group! Is anyone
exerimenting with a lot of bounced email from MSN and Hotmail? If so
can some one shead some light as to why alot of this mail is getting returned?
In general terms.
Kevin ShimwellLink Brokers Group, LLC ( Support
)1600 Hwy 17 SouthNorth Myrtle Beach, SC 29582Phone:
There has been a lot of talk on the
Imail list about problems sending to Hotmail the last 2 weeks.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Shimwell
Sent:
Started getting these lately and needed to find out if they are forged and
if Declude site is setup to handle them as forged.
Exploit-ObjectData trojan
Downloader-IU!zip trojan
Thanks,
Mike
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail
Exploit-ObjectData trojan
As I can see yes.
Downloader-IU!zip trojan
Don't know. Haven't seen any jet.
Markus
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an
Nick and Goran,
I thought that I would clarify one thing that I think is more to the
point on one of the questions regarding scoring.
When a test produces a score, that score always applies to the total
weight regardless of if an action is defined in the JunkMail file.
With custom filters
Was wondering what the attachment names have been?
I received on earlier (I think) and the name of the zip file was support.zip
(had a PIF file within).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Wiegers
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 2:34 PM
Samantha,
It would help tremendously if you could find the Declude log lines that
correspond to this message and share them with the list. It's likely
that the answer is in there.
Matt
Bridges, Samantha wrote:
Scott or anyone who can help -
Below is the headers from a spam message. The
I never complain when I find a new block of IP's for this very reason.
The only time that I ever send any such messages is when they are using
shared resources, although I have found that complaining to bulk
mailers to be useless because it's all auto-response crap, so I stick
with ISP's.
You
OK Let me recap
TESTNAME filter
Is defined in global.cfg
Every e-mail what goes through the system
will have this test executed against it.
Assuming no END statements the test will
run to conclusion. If the e-mail fails something in the test that gives it a
score of 10 then
At 02:34 PM 5/20/2004, Mike Wiegers wrote:
Started getting these lately and needed to find out if they are forged and
if Declude site is setup to handle them as forged.
Exploit-ObjectData trojan
Yep...and
Downloader-IU!zip trojan
Yep...
-Russ
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude
My plan B in those situations is another tech who's still on site :)
want a new job? (just kidding :)
I'm a 1-man shop. Works great so long as you never take a vacation or get hit by a
bus.
--
---
Matt Robertson, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MSB Designs,
2) If the test is executed for all domains then
will the score of the test be added to e-mails for all domains?
Nope. the ACTION of the test - WARN, etc execution is controlled by
the .junkmail where the test is listed.
Incorrect. While it is true of the action, the weight will still be
I am in the same boat.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Robertson
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 1:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:
I just posted a reply to Nicks
post that I should have done earlier. The weight will be applied no matter
what, assuming no END statements and such.
Since it is a filter test, I would put a
line at the top something like this:
ALLRECIPS END NOTENDSWITH domaintobeusedfortestthisrule
Vacation? What's that Same here
Jeff Kratka
TymeWyse Internet
P.O.Box 84 - 110 Ecklund St., Canyonville, OR 97417
tel/fax: (541) 839-6027 - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
You have
WEIGHT10HOLD
WEIGHT20HOLD
In your .junkmail file. Could it be that the WEIGHT20 is nullifying the
WEIGHT10?
You certainly could remove the WEIGHT20 line as the WEIGHT10 will handle
it.
Goran Jovanovic
The LAN Shoppe
-Original Message-
From:
On 20 May 2004 at 13:34, John Tolmachoff (Lists) wrote:
Incorrect. While it is true of the action, the weight will still be
added.
Yup - I was thinking about 0 [zero] scoring and taking an action in
the applicable junkmail file.
Sorry about the misinformation..
-Nick Hayer
.
---
[This
Goran,
Not a difference of opinion, a difference in description, but they were
all accurate.
Test actions have no effect on the score (weight) applied by tests.
Setting a test action to IGNORE will not affect the score applied by
that test.
What you are looking to do would be best done with
I'm pretty sure NOTCONTAINS requires 1.79i7
Scott Fisher
Director of IT
Farm Progress Companies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/20/04 04:05PM
Goran,
Not a difference of opinion, a difference in description, but they were
all accurate.
Test actions have no effect on the score (weight) applied by tests.
Sorry about that. You are of course correct.
Matt
Scott Fisher wrote:
I'm pretty sure NOTCONTAINS requires 1.79i7
Scott Fisher
Director of IT
Farm Progress Companies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/20/04 04:05PM
Goran,
Not a difference of
OK this is what I really wanted to know. Guess
I should have asked that in the first place.
I will go and get the latest interim
and then check it out J
Thanx
Goran Jovanovic
The LAN Shoppe
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
38 matches
Mail list logo
