Maybe Pete can provide some tips what would be good combinations.
Like IP4R + SNIFFER = good because SNIFFER make's no DNS lookups
But not FILTERX + SNIFFER because SNIFFER checks for this already.
Markus
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
How much extra processing to an e-mail does adding a bunch of weight
range statements like:
WEIGHT1019 weightrange x x 10 19
WEIGHT2029 weightrange x x 20 29
WEIGHT3034 weightrange x x 30 34
WEIGHT3539 weightrange x x 35 39
I really just want these just to report on from the logs rather than
Also if I so not want these tests to show up in the %TESTSFAILED%
variable then would I add
HIDETESTS WEIGHT1019 WEIGHT2029..
And would I need to put in the $default$.junkmail file
WEIGHT1019 LOG
Correct. Note that you could simply not include the WEIGHT1019 line
in
the
Correct format. It should show up at high level logs.
Scott Fisher
Director of IT
Farm Progress Companies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/17/04 05:12PM
I seen this post below and wanted to implement the TESTSFAILED to exit out
of one of my body filters based on if another test was already triggered.
What happened here, this message failed miserably and was still delivered to
the user. I hold at 30 this weighed in at 81, it says last action IGNORE but
I dont have any ignore lines in my junkmail file.
06/18/2004 09:39:31 Qf08d0038022e15b0 ERROR: Could not open recip file
I posted my May Ip4R results at this link if you want to compare percents.
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg19089.html
I don't fail on any specific tests, although some are at 90% of my tag weight.
Like Andy I also group tests too.
I have a DUL-Combo that consists of 4 DUL
Hi Scott:
Just thinking out loud. I currently use filters to group multiple test
results. It works fine - but it's not very intuitive to your new customers.
I also don't like maintaining external files where it doesn't offer any
other benefits.
How about the following GROUP...GROUPEND syntax in
We have relay setup for a list of class c ip addresses. We
are in the process of moving imail to a different machine. This is fairly large
list. Where is this list stored (file/registry) and is it transferable to the
other machine without retyping the entire list?
Thank you,
Joshua
I would love it, but really it's a major change. I requested a feature like
this about a month ago.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Andy Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 10:50 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Grouping Syntax
Hi Scott:
Just
We have relay setup for a list of class c ip addresses. We are in the
process of moving imail to a different machine. This is fairly large list.
Where is this list stored (file/registry) and is it transferable to the
other machine without retyping the entire list?
It's in the
Received: from SMTP32-FWD by myserver.mydomain.com
Received: from 82-44-97-74.cable.ubr05.croy.blueyonder.co.uk [82.44.97.74]
by myserver.mydomain.com
(SMTPD32-8.12) id A2FC109014A; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 03:31:24 -0700
X-Message-Info: M910kloPMXge5x274W205+aumRB668UNfe
Received: from
I have the following config for Virus Scanning:
#McAfee Command Line
SCANFILE1 Z:\IMail\NAI\SCAN.EXE /ALL /NOMEM /NOBEEP /NOBREAK /UNZIP /SILENT /NODDA
/REPORT report.txt
VIRUSCODE1 13
REPORT1 Found
#CAI v7
SCANFILE2e:\Progra~1\CA\sHARED~1\ScanEn~1\inocmd32.exe -ARC -VER
For some reason, even though the definations are current and each of them
reports that they are able to detect the virus, they are all missing
ZAFI.B virus. They are succufully catching the Netsky variants.
What does the Declude Virus log file say? What version of Declude Virus
are you
Normally, we expect that all the clients we host on our own mail server
would get very low spam weights. However, I just recieved a message from a
client with a weight of 7. I'm trying to understand why the high weight.
Here is the message header:
Received: from slaptop [65.75.194.49] by
Received: from 82-44-97-74.cable.ubr05.croy.blueyonder.co.uk [82.44.97.74]
by myserver.mydomain.com
(SMTPD32-8.12) id A2FC109014A; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 03:31:24 -0700
X-Message-Info: M910kloPMXge5x274W205+aumRB668UNfe
Received: from mail98522.juzoq.overture.com ([151.226.174.214]) by
Normally, we expect that all the clients we host on our own mail server
would get very low spam weights. However, I just recieved a message from a
client with a weight of 7. I'm trying to understand why the high weight.
Here is the message header:
Received: from slaptop [65.75.194.49] by
We're still running Imail 7.15 -- I have yet to see any value in upgrading
to 8.x -- so is there an easy way to do the whitelisting of local accounts
for IMail 7.x?
Also, what would you think about lowering the weight for CMDSPACE from 8 to
4?
Ben
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott
Scott,
I think you are going to tell me that I cannot do this but I am going to
ask anyway.
I have a client who wants me to send all SPAM to a specific e-mail
address (gateway scenario) so no problem WEIGHT10 ROUTETO
[EMAIL PROTECTED] but it appears that I cannot do an ATTACH nor can I mark
the
18 matches
Mail list logo
