RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Beta 3.0.4 not Processing Files in 'proc' Folder

2005-09-16 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
I am sure you did, but let's check. Did you stop the Imail SMTP service, stop the Imail Queue Manager service, wait for both the proc and work folders to be empty, stop the DecludeProc service, copy in the new decludeproc.exe file, start the DecludeProc service, start the Imail Queue Manager

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Beta 3.0.4 not Processing Files in 'proc' Folder

2005-09-16 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
And yes, as of midnight my time, I am running 3.0.4 and it is working as expected so far. John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists) Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 11:56 PM

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Beta 3.0.4 not Processing Files in 'proc' Folder

2005-09-16 Thread Kim Premuda
Hi, John. Yeah...did all that, except running the JunkMail log in 'HIGH' mode. So, I re-ran the test this morning with the log mode set to 'HIGH'. I ran the test between 7:10A and 7:20A. At the start of the test, both the 'proc' and the 'proc\work' folders were empty. As the test progressed,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Beta 3.0.4 not Processing Files in 'proc' Folder

2005-09-16 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Download the DecludeProc.exe again from the site. Maybe something went wrong there. The version of Imail should make no difference in the processing as it is definitely being handed to declude.exe. Do you have a Declude.cfg file in the Imail\Declude folder? Try putting WAITFORMAIL1 in

[Declude.JunkMail] ROUTING and COUNTRIES

2005-09-16 Thread Nick Hayer
Help from the guru's please... Wouldn't [shouldn't] this email fail the ROUTING test? X-Country-Chain: UNITED STATES-[IANA Reserved]-UNITED STATES-destination X-Note: SMTP Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Note: Sent from: [Revdns: [No Reverse DNS]] [RemoteHostDomain: lgvsoft.at] [RemoteIP:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Beta 3.0.4 not Processing Files in 'proc' Folder

2005-09-16 Thread Kim Premuda
John, I performed the suggestions you gave and got the same results. We shall be giving David at Declude access to our mail server, so they can see what's happening first hand. I'll keep the list posted. Kim -- Original Message -- From: John Tolmachoff

[Declude.JunkMail] 3.0.4

2005-09-16 Thread Ncl Admin
If files are not moving from proc to work make sure you downloaded the right version, I grabbed smartermail version this AM and it does exactly nada under Imail. Duh. Got the Imail version and of course its running now. [This E-mail scanned for viruses by F-Prot] --- This E-mail came from the

[Declude.JunkMail] Interesting Header from a bulk mailer

2005-09-16 Thread Darin Cox
Saw this header today and thought it was mighty interesting. X-Mailer: Spamsoft Spammer Bulk Mailer That's pretty brazen to advertise that you're a spammer in the headers... Darin.

[Declude.JunkMail] Help in creating a Filter

2005-09-16 Thread Erik
Could someone help me in creating a filter? I need something to this effect. Can this be done in one filter? If WEIGHT = 100 or Higher then END If TESTFAILED CONTAINS MN-COMBO Then If CountryChain NOTCONTAINS UNITED STATES Then Then DELETE (triggers the filter - return 100 as

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting Header from a bulk mailer

2005-09-16 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
The funniest one I've seen is: X-Mailer: Minister Punisher 4 Andrew 8) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin CoxSent: Friday, September 16, 2005 10:38 AMTo: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com; Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 3.0.4

2005-09-16 Thread Kim Premuda
Gawck! At first, I thought No way did I do that!, but I hadn't closed the browser session to the Declude beta site. Upon checking, I was astounded to find that I did, indeed, download the SmarterMail version of 'decludeproc.exe' (it was still highlighted)...3 TIMES OVER THE PAST TWO DAYS and

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Help in creating a Filter

2005-09-16 Thread Scott Fisher
I think this would do it in two filters: filter 1: SKIPIFWEIGHT 100 TESTSFAILED END NOTCONTAINS MN-COMBO COUNTRIES 100 NOTCONTAINS US filter 2: SKIPIFWEIGHT 100 TESTSFAILED END NOTCONTAINS MN-COMBO TESTSFAILED END CONTAINS filter1 COUNTRIES END STARTSWITH US COUNTRIES 100 CONTAINS US I'd be

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 3.0.4

2005-09-16 Thread Kevin Bilbee
Declude How about adding in a check into decludeproc when it starts to verify that the proper mail server is installed Kevin Bilbee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kim Premuda Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 11:36 AM To:

re: [Declude.JunkMail] ROUTING and COUNTRIES

2005-09-16 Thread Gary Steiner
I guess it depends on exactly what text it is searching for. In looking at my log files (set to Debug), I see that when it is checking the COUNTRIES filter I created, it displays a message like Checking countries: *A . Is it actually looking for an asterisk followed by an A? Here are some

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Help in creating a Filter

2005-09-16 Thread Erik
Can the %COUNTRYCHAIN% variable be used instead of %COUNTRIES%? Right about be careful... But the MN-COMBO is a mix of 3 to 5 TESTSFAILED combos already. Erik -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 3.0.4

2005-09-16 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Ya know, I thought about asking about that, but said nah, no one could do some thing dumb like I did. ;) John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kim Premuda Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 11:36

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Help in creating a Filter

2005-09-16 Thread Scott Fisher
I don't believe so. I think you have COUNTRY and COUNTRIES. COUNTRY is the last counry in the country chain. - Original Message - From: Erik [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 2:07 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Help in creating a

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ROUTING and COUNTRIES

2005-09-16 Thread Scott Fisher
Yes COUNTRIES 0 CONTAINS *A is correct. The Asterick is a literal. codes I know of: *1 Multi-Regional *2 Europe *3 North America *4 Central/South America *5 Pacific Rim *A ARIN Unlisted (North America/South Africa) *B Public Data Network *E RIPE Unlisted (Europe, North Africa, Middle East) *I

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Help in creating a Filter

2005-09-16 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Just to second this - I have seen a large amount of customers also farm out filtering to companies like big fish which scan the mail in oversea's countries. Darrell Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Help in creating a Filter

2005-09-16 Thread Erik
We've been monitoring the MN-COMBO test (multiple tests failed) for the past 2 months. Most are failing INV-URIBL and SNIFFER; but some only failing one of them (either SNIFFER or INV-URIBL) but will fail DSBL/CBL/ROUTING/MXRATE. We've noticed that all the emails that we've monitored with the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Help in creating a Filter

2005-09-16 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Does anyone know (Darrell); if the %COUNTRYCHAIN% can be passed to an external program? I've thought of developing an EXE that does this final scan after MN-COMBO is tested. It should be - at this point any variable I have messed with has been passable to an external test. Darrell ---

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Help in creating a Filter

2005-09-16 Thread Scott Fisher
I don't have the order... But I believe filters are done last after External comments. If David's monitoring the list, I think a list of what order the tests run in would be a great addition to the Junkmail manual. - Original Message - From: Erik [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

[Declude.JunkMail] Beta 3.0.4

2005-09-16 Thread Kim Premuda
IMail 8.05 HF3 After installing JunkMail beta 3.0.4 (for IMail) this morning, everything seemed to be working. That is, I could see the THREAD requisite number of d*.smd and q*.smd file pairs being moved to the 'proc\work' folder, whereupon they would get processed and disappear. I visually