Same name? Personalized to the agent name? Also through RR in VA? I'm
still interested in exactly what the angle is.. seems like a lot of effort.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik
Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2006 1:48 PM
To:
My best guess would be that he is just trying to validate addresses in
his database of realtors so that he can sell them to others or spam them
with niche content.
Matt
Marc Catuogno wrote:
Same name? Personalized to the agent name? Also through RR in VA? I'm
still interested in exactly
1 hit of comments with the 10 parameter since
10/1/05... If it matters it was spam.
- Original Message -
From:
Goran Jovanovic
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2006 10:24
AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Comments
Test
Back in
New Service Would Charge E-Mail Senders
http://my.netscape.com/corewidgets/news/story.psp?cat=51180id=2006020521220001389466
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - Two of the world's biggest e-mail account
providers, Yahoo Inc. and America Online, plan to introduce a
service that would charge senders a fee to
I'd like to charge senders a penny per email. Wouldn't you? That is the old
post office model.
I just don't think that goodmail has the right model.
-d
- Original Message -
From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 10:33 PM
Considering that AOL and Yahoo both have issues with blocking legitimate
E-mail, and Yahoo is just about the most exploited service provider on
the planet, responsible for a great number of phishing and Nigerian
scams, I find it quite hypocritical for them to in the business of
charging
Matt, I agree with you.
It would mean nothing to a major spammer to spend 1/4 cent per message to
have it guaranteed delivered.
For 100K messages, that would be $250 which would actually improve the
spammers' chances for more responses since the recipients would then trust
the sender.
John T
