Here is a preliminary list, not all have been verified and several are
currently being worked on: (Note these does not include Declude adds for new
functionality) Email me if you are aware of a known issue that is not on
this list.
*Line Terminator Problem
*Auto whitelist Imail 2006
*Reported
John T,
The Auto whitelist IMail 2006 is the issue I was referring to a few days ago
in regards to wanting users that SMTP AUTH to be whitelisted. Were you were
saying that this was working with 2006 and Declude 4.x?
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi All;
We have been having a problem with Declude not modifying the true
subject and header on many spam messages. Sniffer and a number of the
other tests catch the message, but Declude is adding a header stub to
the bottom of the message source, and not the real header. Since we
have our
IMail changed their addressbook from text files to a database in 2006
currently Declude does not read the databse.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin
Cox
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:44 AM
To:
Ahh, so I was correct. SMTP AUTH is still an issue. That in itself is a
showstopper for us to move to IMail 2006 and Declude 4.x
How soon until Declude will read this and auto whitelist, David? IMail 2006
was released a year ago.
The following from your list are showstoppers for us to
Gee, some one not reading posts to the list for the last week?
John T
eServices For You
Seek, and ye shall find!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Herb
Guenther
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 8:02 AM
To:
The Auto whitelist IMail 2006 is the issue I was referring to a few days
ago
in regards to wanting users that SMTP AUTH to be whitelisted. Were you
were
saying that this was working with 2006 and Declude 4.x?
WHITELIST AUTH line in the Global.cfg is working as expected.
The Auto Whitelist
Darin,
Many of these issues exist in your current version, upgrading is not going
to make things worse, other than perhaps the Imail addressbook 2006.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin
Cox
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006
Ahh... you're right. I was mixing the two issues together. Both are issues
for us, though.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: John T (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 11:35 AM
Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE:
Hi David,
What's the ETA on the address book issue? As I mentioned IMail 2006 was
released a year ago. Many of our customers use the whitelist address book
feature currently, so we cannot upgrade if that means losing that feature.
Also, I don't believe most of these issues exist in 1.82 or
Darin, let me put it plainly.
If you put WHITELIST AUTH line in the Global.cfg file any user the sends
out through your server via smtp and who authenticates to the server will be
Whitelisted.
In other words, SMTP AUTH whitelisting is and has been working. I have
provided clear proof and others
Right. I responded in another email that I was mistakenly mixing the two
issues thinking one thing and saying another...
Sorry for the confusion.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: John T (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006
Hi,
Thanks for posting! Openness is a great confidence builder! Seeing that
problems are at least being recognized goes a long way to giving me some
small flicker of hope that things at Declude might turn around yet.
Now your corporate management has to prove themselves by demonstrating that
With reference to X-Declude-RefID: it is part of the *Zerohour test doesn't
operate as other tests issue.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy
Schmidt
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 2:14 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
I agree, the openness is refreshing. Also, it shouldn't be forgotten
that most of these bugs existed back in the the Scott days, but for the
most part weren't known to be bugs.
BTW, I too would like to see that X-Declude-RefID removed when it isn't
used, and maybe Declude should consider
I agree, ZEROHOUR needs to fuction like all the other tests.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 2:59 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: Declude's To-Do List
I
Article Information
Article ID:
29
Author:
David Barker
Created:
6/22/2005
Modified:
6/18/2006
Views:
331
Even though it was
revised on 6/18, this entry is useless, because the link to the badheaders
lookup page is broken.
The version in the customer login area is out of date,
and the one inside the "current" Declude installer is 3 months further out of
date, even though the installer is newer than the all_list.dat
...
Andrew.
---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe,
Andy,
It is best to rather email support with an issue like this
to be resolved. No value in posting things like this to the JM list.
I fixed the link.
David
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy SchmidtSent:
Wednesday, October 25, 2006 4:47 PMTo:
1. The all_list.dat is not updated every
release.
2. The latest all_list.dat is posted on the My Account page
6 July 06
David
B
www.declude.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, AndrewSent:
Wednesday, October 25, 2006 4:55 PMTo:
Exactly. It needs to be either available at a reasonable price of all of us
to use or it should not show up in the headers of those that are prevented
from using it.
Goes back to my point when it first became available: Declude wetted our
appetite about ZEROHOUR and then when it became available
To be sure, my next post to the list is not at you. It is for your bosses.
John Tolmachoff
Owner, eServices For You
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
626-737-6003
Fax 626-737-6004
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Wednesday,
David,
You also need to add a new whitelist tag (whitelistunique?) that only
whitelists the TO recipient if it's the only recipient for the email.
This bit about whitelisting all recipients if one is whitelisted is a
problem.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
David,
I don't know if this was mentioned, but way back in 1.x a function to
help with this was created called BYPASSWHITELIST
bypasswhitelist
This optional test instructs Declude JunkMail to bypass any
whitelisting for emails with at least a specific number of recipients
and at least a
John,
FYI - Herb was not a member of this list last week. He was a member on the
Sniffer list and asked a Declude question and someone recommended he join
this list.
Haven't you been reading the Sniffer list?
Darrell
I forgot 1 + 1 = 2.
My bad.
John T
eServices For You
Seek, and ye shall find!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Darrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 9:48 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re:
26 matches
Mail list logo
