[Declude.JunkMail] Header Filter

Hi all, I have a need to use Declude to filter mail to a user's spambox based on X-IMAIL-SPAM in the headers (we're still using an imail filter that we don't want to give up). I created a custom filter file with the following: HEADERS 10 CONTAINSX-IMAIL-SPAM (separated by tabs)

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Header Filter

Bill, thanks-- this helps a lot. The imail statistics test was one I wanted to capture with declude, but mostly I'm looking for the phrase and URL tests (which we've spent years tweaking extensively). So, this is good news (although I still can't get it working-- maybe imail writes headers

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Header Filter

: Spaminator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill, thanks-- this helps a lot. The imail statistics test was one I wanted to capture with declude, but mostly I'm looking for the phrase and URL tests (which we've spent years tweaking extensively). So, this is good news (although I still can't get it working

[Declude.JunkMail] MAILBOX Action Missing Headers

Here's a frustrating issue... I have two WEIGHT10 tests, one to move the mail message to the user's spambox (WEIGHT10) and another to modify the subject (WEIGHT10SUB). Both work most of the time, but I have users complaining about occasionally getting filtered spam in their INBOX instead of

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] PIDDEBUG

Very distressingly, I've had the same thing happen to me multiple times, but to a much more significant degree. Just yesterday, I received a client call regarding a lack of email coming in. I checked, and there were *83* Declude processes running, all of which seemed to be doing nothing.

[Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail vs iMail

I've long been evaluating both SmarterMail and iMail. While offended at the iMail price increases, I am generally pleased with the maturity of the product (trying to track down the cause of mail routing failures, etc. would seem more difficult in SmarterMail). However, I have not used

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2.06 with Imail 8.21

Greetings all, We're planning on upgrading to iMail 8.21 this week, and wanted to see if anyone know of any significant problems with this latest release and Declude 2.06+AV+FProt+Sniffer+invURIbl2.5. We're still affected by too many Declude processes that somehow get spawned, locking up mail

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude + IMail Anti-Spam Premium Filters

We just performed a cutover tonight, and both products appear to be working great. The problem is the lack of weighting in iMail for their Premium Filters. I was hoping to use Declude to filter for X-IMAIL-PREMIUM in the headers, but it doesn't seem to work. I wonder if the IMail Premium

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HTML code in spam

I wouldn't operate under that assumption... there is plenty of email that's sent with a font size of 1. The legal disclaimer on the bottom of my real account is a good example, as are numerous carefully-formatted emails from Amazon, etc. Font Size=1 isn't *that* small. ;-) --

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] AutoWhitelist feature with Imail 2006

On 8/9 I received the following response from Declude in regards to the AutoWhiteList feature with iMail 2006: No. Declude version 4.3.7 is not compatible with this. We are currently working on a fix. Thanks. -- Original Message -- From: Bill Green