RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter

2009-05-18 Thread Dan Shadix
We've been running Declude Interceptor for a few months now and I agree completely with David's comments. It has been great and the transition was very easy. Dan From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 1:04 PM To:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] INVURIBL WEIGHT?

2008-04-22 Thread Dan Shadix
I hold on invURIBL alone. Dan From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 7:56 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] INVURIBL WEIGHT? Hi everyone, I would appreciate hearing some opinions. How heavy are

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Reasons to renew

2008-04-02 Thread Dan Shadix
I, for one, like infrequent but solid updates. I don’t have time to be constantly installing and testing updates, especially if they are problematic. Also, Declude is the only affordable anti-virus / anti-spam e-mail solution that I’ve encountered. I haven’t really been looking lately but

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Software for copying files with permissions

2007-06-26 Thread Dan Shadix
Robocopy is free from Microsoft and will do all that you ask and more. Just be careful when you use the /mir switch (or others that automatically delete files). Dan From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sharyn Schmidt Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 6:49 AM To:

[Declude.JunkMail] Blocking executables

2007-01-19 Thread Dan Shadix
I block all executables but it's obvious that many of you can not. Would it be a good idea to have the ability to block all of a file type while whitelisting certain filenames? Dan --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] blocking GIF attachments again ...

2006-11-08 Thread Dan Shadix
You call that a downside -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 12:00 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] blocking GIF attachments again ... If you are not

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] INV-URIBL Scoring?

2006-10-10 Thread Dan Shadix
I hold on just INV-URIBL, but that's just me and I'm no where near as on top of this stuff as most people that post here. That said, I've never found a false positive from INV-URIBL. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom Sent:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer vs. Commtouch

2006-10-04 Thread Dan Shadix
Title: Message Commtouch ispart of the Declude Suite. You have to get the new version of Declude and pay them separately for Commtouch. I had to put ZEROHOUR14 inmyglobal.cfg and then it started catching quite a bit more spam for me. Dan From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer vs. Commtouch

2006-10-03 Thread Dan Shadix
I've been using commtouch for a few weeks now and have noticed a significant reduction in spam. I never used sniffer so can't compare. I have found a few false positives but only a few. Dan From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert GrosshandlerSent: Tuesday,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FIND command question

2006-09-23 Thread Dan Shadix
I often use findstr instead of find. You still have to use /I to make it case insensitive but it has quite a bit of flexibility. Dan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 12:09 PM To:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-19 Thread Dan Shadix
I am one of the Declude users that is not a service provider but use it only to protect our relatively small network. I've been very happy with Declude's recent moves and have upgraded to the 4.x suite. I'll be researching this new offering and if the price/performance pans out I'll buy a

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: command line for killing a win2k process

2006-06-15 Thread Dan Shadix
Title: WAY OT: command line for killing a win2k process On XPandW2K3 the sc command can be used for this. It think sc is also available on 2K (maybe in the resource kit). sc \\computername stop servicename sc /? for details From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem

2005-10-25 Thread Dan Shadix
My sentiments exactly. Well said. Dan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 12:33 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem Okay, I'm watching these

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and IMail 8.2

2005-08-23 Thread Dan Shadix
Is it safe to assume that the re-written Declude will continue to work with Imail 7.15? I long ago stopped upgrading Imail and have recently switched to Exchange with Imail/Declude as a front-end filter. I planned to stay in this configuration until Declude releases a version that doesn't

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail / Declude as a front end for Exchange

2005-07-20 Thread Dan Shadix
to the Exchange server but Exchange rejects it unless the primary SMTP address is email.trhs.org. If anyone can help me figure out what I'm missing I'd appreciate it greatly. Dan Shadix

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail / Declude as a front end for Exchange

2005-07-20 Thread Dan Shadix
email address. Darrell Dan Shadix writes: I have an Exchange 2003 server setup using my domain name trhs.org. I added an SMTP recipient policy for email.trhs.org and created an alias on the Imail server to forward mail to email.trhs.org. I also added email.trhs.org to the hosts file