John,
Can you list multiple REVDNS on a single line when using spamdomains?
For example
@bellsouth.net .bellsouth. isp.att.
Thanks,
Keith
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John
T (lists)
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 10:55 AM
To:
is that all 4
messages contained the same body although from different sources. Still
awaiting Linda's response at Declude.
Thanks,
Keith
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Keith
Johnson
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 1:09 PM
Support,
What is the best way to tell what signature version I am running with the
onboard AVG engine? Also, how do I manually pull down a signature if I need to
update before the automatic download interval? Thanks for the aid.
Keith
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail
David,
Do you have an exhaustive explanation of what exactly each of
the new commands does? I have seen a tremendous amount of emails to
alter this and alter that, however, what does it actually do and how
does one affect the other? Thanks for the aid.
Keith
-Original Message-
John,
Is 3.0.5.5 100% stable? I have seen numerous posts on this forum
about ongoing issues with MAILFROM (triggering on local unauth. domains),
COUNTRY Test and with Multi-Procs (especially above 100K volume per day). I
have a call into Declude support on the above to see what is
Davebe,
Wow, you read my mind. I saw this as well this week on my Linux dns
box. Thanks for the update.
Keith
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Dave Doherty
Sent: Sat 9/24/2005 10:12 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail]
Nick,
If you don't mind, is SA heavy on the CPU? What kinda load are
you running with SA? We are wanting to pursue it, however, Sanford had
mentioned awhile back it would be heavy on the CPU. Thanks again,
Keith
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Travis,
In your setup, your Declude is running on a Windows 2k/2003 box calling
your SA server on a Linux box on the same local network? I guess the speeds
are much the same as quering a local DNS server for lookups. Sounds great, I
will have look into this, my loads are around the same
Scott,
What type of speed are you getting from using the invuribl? We
take in/out well over 70K emails per day on each server, 1 of them takes
in/out 150K. As I understand it, it is very CPU intensive. Thanks for
the aid.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just an fyi. Seems like we could have Declude query a public database
of sites. Worth a look.
Keith
For what it's worth, Netcraft has announced that it is making
available to ISPs, hosting companies, etc., a feed of it's
phishing sites etc.
Integration, and Log Parsers.
Keith Johnson writes:
Just an fyi. Seems like we could have Declude query a public database
of sites. Worth a look.
Keith
For what it's worth, Netcraft has announced that it is making
available to ISPs, hosting companies, etc., a feed of it's phishing
Darrell,
Did you prior adjust your TcpWindowSize value?
Keith
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Sat 4/23/2005 10:30 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Cc:
Subject:
went on the assumption that my scanners got corrupted
and thus deinstalled them and reinstalled them. I thought it was just my
server, but it seems it could be a broader issue.
Keith
Johnson
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
MattSent: Monday, April 18, 2005 4:10
I believe all is needed here is to add a @ symbol in from of your domain
in your .txt file
Thus,
@phobraun.com per Jessica's request
-Keith
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 11:12 AM
To:
I have burned by not having deselected Hide file extensions for known
file types, thus my example.txt file was really example.txt.txt Could
this be the case?
Keith
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 15,
Heinrich,
How are you determining your detection rates? Are you using a
combination of certain tests or overall test percentages? Thanks for
the time.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heinrich
Richter
Sent: Friday, April
Darrell,
I am going to have to test that. I asked Scott that same
question about a year ago and he said it would shoot the entire email.
I will give it a go.
Keith Johnson
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL
Does the following break in RFC compliance issues with servers required to
accept email? Customer has proper PTR Records for IP, however, domain name is
a private one, i.e. customer.localThanks for the aid.
Denied Message Reads:
Our mail system now 'requires' that your outgoing mail
Title: Message
Andrew,
Not sure if this applies here, but here
is Microsoft stance on Hyperthreading CPU's...
Microsoft says...Per Processor LicensingFor
currently available Microsoft servers products licensed on a per processor basis
(e.g., Microsoft SQL Server, Microsoft BizTalk
, those that understand
binary, and those that don't.
_
- Original Message -
From: Keith Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, January
.
_
- Original Message -
From: Keith Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 5:32 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 12:25 PM
To: Keith Johnson
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [OT] Exchange2Alias Question
I opened port 389 through a client firewall from our Imail Server
(just in testing) and attempted to query their server using the
exchange2alias script, however
is additional Rec. Policy added (all
users have as 2nd or 3rd address)
Thanks for the aid.
---
Keith Johnson
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just
Sandy,
Along those lines, what is the proper way of going about ldap'ing 2 or
more OU's in order to get all the email addresses. What I have been doing is
calling the script 3 times (different scripts and params) and using the flag
that removes all entries on the first pass only.
We have a few customers with multiple OU's that contain employees (i.e.
by Departments). Is there a way to include all the OU's on a single
LDAP:// parameter line or do I need to just run it several times for
each OU and not use the -nc flag except on the very first run. Thanks
again,
Keith
---
Andrew,
Is the only lines you altered in Sandy's script were:
cscript exchange2aliases.vbs storeforward.mydomain.com
LDAP://10.192.0.1/cn=users,dc=bentall,dc=local mydomain.com mydomain.com
Going for a test ride tomorrow.
Thanks for the aid,
Keith
-Original Message-
Mark,
I would grab V-Fileviewer, it opens large files in chunks, much
faster. Opens 500MB files in seconds.
http://www.fileviewer.com
Keith
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark E. Smith
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 3:56 PM
Scott,
Is there any size limitation (# of entries per file) imposed on
fromfiles or the number or fromfiles you can have listed in the
Global.cfg?
Thanks,
Keith
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Tuesday,
Can you use the SKIPIFWEIGHT and MAXWEIGHT in the fromfiles?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Johnson
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 2:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Question about Filters
Scott
Anyone have an issue using gmail.com email that is fails the
subjectchars test if you place more than one word in the subject line?
Line reads:
LONGSUBJsubjectchars60 * 0 0
Subject Line used: Test Me
Keith
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
, it seems it would be benefical to move the domains
from our filter files into fromfiles thus allowing for a reduction on
CPU processing since they are run first (while using SKIPIFWEIGHT lines
in filters). Thanks for the aid.
---
Keith Johnson
Senior Network Engineer
Network
Does Hijack work with WHITELIST AUTH that Junkmail sees in allowing
email to passthru? For example, one of our customers AUTH to our server
via their account, it will then not be scanned by Junkmail nor Hijack?
Thanks for the time.
---
Keith Johnson
Senior Network Engineer
?
However, using term services on Win2000 SP4 does not allow connection to
the console. Thanks for the aid.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Johnson
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 2:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Scott,
(I apologize for the questions, just learning product, since no
trial) With the below said, there is really no reason to login and
close the deccon.exe via the Desktop unless there is an issue with it or
something needs to be hard reset? Some of our customers have had DHA's
Since the fromfiles are loaded first and weight assigned after it gets a
hit, even before RBL's, can I use the skipifweight or STOPATFIRSTHIT
option in the fromfiles? Thanks for the aid.
Keith
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail
Sanford,
What type of CPU overhead do you experience with running SA/SPAMD with Declude?
I saw the tech doc and it mentioned that it takes up 20MB of memory for each config
file load in serial. Are you aware of anyone running this on machines pulling over
200K emails each day?
Jeff,
I was able to get it via my account login at www.declude.com.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Jeff Maze
Sent: Tue 9/28/2004 10:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail]
Does the DOMAINWHITELISTS flag override the WHITELISTFILE entry that you can list in
the per domain config file and is it required? Does it require the whitelist file to
be named whitelist.txt? We have been running 1.79 for awhile, but noticed it in the
Release notes, but been using
Would love to have a look at it. Thanks for the offer.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Matt Goodhue
Sent: Mon 9/20/2004 8:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelister /
I am running Imail 8.13 with Declude 1.79i16 on Win2003 Server and any inbound email
to our server receives the following message. If I email locally, I get good clean
ldelivers. I checked my AV Scanners and they are not monitoring the server at all,
have them disabled. Any suggestions would
I apologize, to clarify the good clean ldelivers were shown while using Web
Messaging, not SMTP.
Thanks again for the aid.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Keith Johnson
Sent: Sat 9/18/2004 11:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
.
Thanks, Keith
-Original Message-
From: Keith Johnson on behalf of Keith Johnson
Sent: Sat 9/18/2004 11:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] File Lock Issue
I apologize, to clarify
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: Keith Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Johnson
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 8:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail
Bill,
You are the man. I did have Alligate defined and it expired due to them not
really adding enhan. for Declude. Sweet, I really appreciate it. Weird issue as
Declude Log did not report that it failed on that test. Thanks again,
Keith
Keith, are you running any external tests?
We currently have 6 versions of Declude (3 Servers with Junkmail and Virus), can I run
a Hijack demo on each of the servers? If so, what is the term of the demo? Thanks
for the aid.
Keith
Nf_ ynub!
0u%dj)\jgr[xf)+-Nrz;uj)l^r[yjwmmr[x8^j!qy.i0f+r
Scott Fisher,
I heard you mention once that you made a filter to catch Chinese characters in
the subject, we have a few customers that get nailed by these often. Was wondering if
you could share your thoughts. Thanks,
Keith
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
? We also have internal DNS servers for routing
email (using BIND) between internally NAT'd servers, do I need to
publish SPF records for those as well. Thanks for the clarify.
Keith Johnson
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail
Scott,
Awesome, thanks for the aid.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 1:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF Setup
We virtual host (as well as
Is it possible for Declude to add a footer to an outbound email sent
through the Imail Server for a customer who is using us to send outbound
email. They would like us to scan their outbound email and then tag a
'scanned for viruses' footer to those emails. However, this should only
be for this
Aww, great idea Scott, I will give it a road test.
Thanks,
Keith
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Tue 6/15/2004 5:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Outbound
Scott,
Did the Msg Failed line under LOGLEVEL MID to report the
individual line numbers that it failed in a filter test get moved to
HIGH?
Keith
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 12:50 PM
Scott,
Thanks, we have been running along with MID since the beginning,
all along, upgrading the interim releases. We just this week needed to
know which line it failed on in one of our filter files. This is what
we get now in our log. I will up to HIGH this week. Thanks,
Scott,
Can I point to two whitelistfile's in the per user config file
for junkmail (i.e. to WHITELISTFILE entries on separate lines). For
example, one to main corporate then a personal one. Thanks,
Keith
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
Samantha,
We have had this type of setup in place for years, works great.
We filter tons of email for Exchange, Domino, and other SMTP Servers.
Let me know if I can give aid.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bridges,
and viruses?
What about the rules via Imail...they don't run do they???
I user a lot of rules to block email and with this solution they could
not take advantage of rules.ima, right?
-Original Message-
From: Keith Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 2:59 PM
Scott,
Are you aware of any issues related to filter files in which the log reports
and weights against a line in the filter, however, it was the line below or above it
that should have got triggered?
For example, lets stay that line 39 states:
BODY 5
Scott,
Should I run the latest interim release to fix this issue? Just had a few
upset customers, thanks,
Keith
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Wed 2/11/2004 8:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a few users on a domain who have a vacation in place. For those
users, I have a Per-User Declude config that uses the MailBox function
for the Weight20 test. Does the vacation message get triggered on the
actually Main inbox or also sub mailboxes? What I am noticing is that
when I check
Is it possible that in a Store/Forward scenario that when a WEIGHT20
test is reached to insert a X-Note in the Header, much like we take
action with RouteTo or Mailbox?
Thanks,
Keith
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from
Use the action of WARN.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Johnson
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 8:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
John,
Thanks again, found it in the manual. Thanks for your time.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: Keith Johnson
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 12:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Option Request
John,
Can this WARN have a specific custom
I received the following error in the log file and subsequently the
email did not ROUTETO although it was listed on the WEIGHT20 line, it
went on to the main mailbox of the customer un-routed. Is there any
reason for the Error? I checked the log and only had one other instance
of this for the
Scott,
Thanks for your aid, it is always appreciated. I passed a
similar explanation on to our customer. I'll watch our logs for any
patterns.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 6:27 PM
To: [EMAIL
Marc,
I had great succes with the AOL Postmaster line at:
1.888.212.5537 I worked with a guy named, John Rardin, he fixed a few
client issues in a timely fashion. I emailed him a few of the client
emails and he was able to figure out why it was being blocked by them
and in 1 case they
The most recent update today from F-Prot will catch it, just checked it
in the virlist.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 2:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Mydoom.b
It is not
What would cause extra CR in the middle of a line in the Virus or
Declude log files or incomplete line entries? We have a Parser that
runs through to pull out info, however, at times it will encounter the
above and have to skip the entries. Thanks for the info.
Keith
---
[This E-mail was
). Also, if
Declude gets this back, it cancels processing of not only the DNS based tests,
but also filters or external programs (i.e. Sniffer) according to the log.
Thanks for the aid.
Keith
From: Keith Johnson Sent: Sunday,
January 25, 2004 1:55 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE
I noticed in our Declude Log (running MID) that we have numerous of the below message
(different domains). Is this telling me that there was no MX or A record listed for
the lookup domain? I pretty sure, however, just wanted to check, thanks for the aid.
Keith
WARNING: DNS server
Scott,
Thanks for the aid. I'm with you on the second point, I think our DNS server
(Bind 8.4.3) attempted to verify the domain (all of them look spam in nature) and
couldn't find an A or MX listed for them and returned back to Declude that warning. I
appreciate the speedy response,
Scott,
A took some time and went through the log and found that the following was
true on all the ones I checked (around 50) entries, the following examples were found
using dnsreport.com about the Warnings:
Getting MX record for mail3b-better-health.wsol8423.com... Received an
Scott,
I took some time and went through the log and found that the
following was true on all the ones I checked (around 50) entries, the following
examples were found using dnsreport.com about the Warnings:
Getting MX record for
We are giving our Declude filters an overhaul this week, adding in all
the functionality of the new 'beta' tests and I wanted to ensure I am
good on the following:
Using Examples SKIPWEIGHT 70
MAXWEIGHT 60
MINWEIGHT 20
MAXWEIGHT: If during the run of the
, 2004 10:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Clarification
That is all correct (just one note to clarify, though: END will stop
processing that one filter, but other tests will run).
-Scott
At 10:35 AM 1/21/2004, Keith Johnson wrote:
We
I read the following on the Register. Does anyone know if we can include this
into Declude? Thanks for the aid:
Clip taken from: http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/34690.html
However, Spamhaus plans to fight back. Yesterday, it released its
Scott,
It looks as if IpSwitch may have fixed the issue in 8.05 that
keeps Declude from being called.
Taken from 8.05 Release Notes...
o Queuemgr: Decreased the possibility that during a queue run the
queuemgr might process files before a third party process
locks the message.
Keith
Although this is not the same issue as Declude not getting called, I did want to bring
it to everyones attention. For those of you that Store and Forward to other email
servers, Imail 8.04 is having issues with removing body text from emails on the smtp
rdeliver action to a remote server. I
Scott,
For those of us that have had email (daily) skipping Declude
calling would it be good for us to move up to the 1.76i27 to have that
logged for you?
Keith
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 1:03 PM
To: [EMAIL
Title: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude does not see email
Scott,
This issue of Declude (1.76i and Imail
8.04)not seeing email has picked up tremendously in the past week or
so. We are starting to see this a lot in our own email as well as our
customers reporting it. It seems to be
Title: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude does not see email
Kami,
That is exactly what I am seeing, no record of
it. It scares me that email is getting through our system for our
customers, yet it is unscanned. We handle total of about 150K emails each
day across two servers and we are seeing
Since Imail doesn't have a way to reject an email based on its size when
a domain is setup in a Gateway scenario (i.e. store and forward), I
thought I would post this to the Declude community. Does Declude JMPro
have a way to bounce an email based upon its size? What we are seeing,
is when an
We are running Declude JMPro Version 1.76i13. Most of our domains are
setup using the Per Domain configuration, in those configs, we have
setup ROUTETO statements to route their spam to a certain email address
either local or remote. Since last Thursday (off and on before that),
some spam email
Does the Declude JunkMail log file show any information about the
E-mail? There have been unconfirmed reports of IMail v8 skipping Declude
processing that we are investigating
I have a few emails saved that passed through Declude unscanned if they would be
helpful.
We are starting to see this
We use both Declude (1.76beta) and Sniffer and both work great.
However, we are are in the process of trying to run several Sniffer
tests and take action on individual return codes rather than nonzero.
It is my understanding that Declude will only call the Sniffer test once
although numerous
I have also noticed today that it appears Declude JunkMail is no
longer calculating weights correctly.
If you upgrade to the latest interim release at
http://www.declude.com/release/176i/declude.exe , it takes care of
this
issue.
Wasn't actually expecting a response until tomorrow
Mike,
The Easynet-Dyna test is an external ip4r DNS test setup in your global.cfg
file. See the Declude link below to see further info on this.
http://www.declude.com/Junkmail/support/ip4r.htm
Keith
-Original Message-
From: Michael Graveen [mailto:[EMAIL
We have a unique issue in that we have a customer that gets email to
user-user (alias) that goes to an account called useruser (without the
hyphen), both on our server, within same domain. When a spam email
comes in addressed to the alias and other users within the same domain,
it gets scanned by
Scott,
Would you like the Declude Log or the Sys Log from IMail? This domain was
setup as mail.domain.com in Imail and there is an alias on it for domain.com (transfer
from another vendor Imail server), I have a Declude folder called mail.domain.com,
however do I need one called
For the alias, you'll need to use the domain that the alias resolves
to. If it resolves to the official name of the domain (mail.domain.com),
then you can use the same directory. But if you are using a different
domain for the alias than the official name of the domain, then you would
need to
shows a return of *. I just wanted to get a sanity check on the proper use of return
codes, especially if they list as Various. Also, if the show in the Global.cfg as *,
yet on the Declude Website have a return code, should I replace the * with a code.
Thanks for the time.
Keith Johnson
N¬f
I have a strange request, however, I don't think it can be done. I have
a store-and-forward domain (Exchange User) that would like for us to
forward individual spam email to another location for each individual
user. The catch is, they don't want to send us their individual user
email addresses
Scott,
If I add the new interim release, what does JM Pro do to an
email it finds with this trigger? Do I need to add anything to the
global.cfg file? Thanks for the aid.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003
Scott,
The DECODE OFF option; what would it not catch (i.e. Spam) had the option been
turned on? I understand Base64, but what kind of HTML decoding? We have a server at
capacity as well, but we are not adding anymore customers to it, however, at times the
CPU is at 100% which causes
Mishi,
I am running 8.02 and 7.15HF2 with Relay for Addresses and Declude JM Pro
1.75i and I just ran the test and produced perfect results on both machines. It only
reported 'Unknown User' and 'Not a local gateway', which is great. What relay setting
are you running and version of
r to relay.
-Original Message-From: Keith Johnson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith
JohnsonSent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 8:34 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
Declude failing openrelay test
Mishi,
I am running
I have a customer who only wants to get email to a list of valid
employees, no one else (i.e. ex-employees). However, the list of
ex-employees is too long for him to come up with, thus he gave me the
list of valids. I looked, but I don't think Declude has a HEADER tag
called DOESNOT CONTAIN,
Scott,
The problem with using the CONTAINS is that I would have to have
a list of the ex-employees and the only list he can put together is the
good employees. Thus if I used the CONTAINS I would be hitting good
employee email. Any other suggestions, thanks for your time.
Keith
What
Delete the nobody alias. Then, only valid email in his domain will be
accepted. Delete all old employees not on the list of valid names you
just received from the domain.
-Original Message-
From: Keith Johnson
The problem with using the CONTAINS is that I would have to have
a
list
Scott,
SWEET, that is a great idea, I'll give it a go, you are the man.
Keith Johnson
CONTAINS *would* work in this way. For example:
HEADERS -1000 CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HEADERS -1000 CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
In this case, an E-mail
Scott,
I spoke to soon. If I use the weighting method, it hurts my ability to use
the Weight system to guard them against Spam. Your thoughts...
Keith
-Original Message-
From: Keith Johnson
Sent: Tue 9/2/2003 1:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Scott,
Since we house mulitple domains (using spam filtering) and this filter test is
used in the Global file it seems it would fail every other domain email (i.e. 1000
weight) that we house on the same box?! Is there a way to only define it for use in
the default config file for that
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
