Hi all,
Running Declude Junkmail Pro 2.0.6 on Imail 8.15. I upgraded Declude to
2.0.6 from 2.0.5 on 4/15 and have gotten a few of these seemingly
randoml log errors every day since. Nothing else on the server changed
but Declude.
04/15/2005 11:19:37 QDB810281006E1D24 ERROR: Could not move
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude
And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI
integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.
Todd Ryan writes:
Hi all,
Running Declude Junkmail Pro 2.0.6 on Imail
:
WEIGHT20HOLD %DATE%
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd Ryan
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 11:57 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Could not move spam to hold! error since
2.0.6
workstation?
Thanks.
--Todd.
--
Todd Ryan
LAN Administrator
Libraries and Media Services
Kent State University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.library.kent.edu/users/tryan/
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from
t;. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
--
Todd Ryan
LAN Administrator
Libraries and Media Services
Kent State University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.library.kent.edu/users/tryan/
I did exactly this when we added SPAMCHK as a test last year. I
believe they recommended this range because spamchk would add a lot of
small weights and a 1-10 scale is too narrow. It also allows us to
create filters with words that are more common in non-spam, but more
likely to be spam in
Hi all,
All of the recent talk about SpamChk has finally prompted me to give it
a spin. Per the documentation, I am considering change my weight
scale. That is, I normally hold on 10 and delete on 25. Of course, my
per-test weights are adjusted accordingly.
I am thinking about doing what
Hi all,
I want to run this by everyone before I do something potentially stupid...I
have occasions where good yahoo.com mail fails a FILTER or SNIFFER test and
along with failing NOPOSTMASTER and NOABUSE as yahoo always does, this
throws it over my bounce threshhold.
I'd like to ward this off by
Um...er...yeah...I knew you could do that cough...cough...
It DOES sound too simple. Have I been using JM for all these years and I
didn't know you could have a pass weight in the config file?! I swear I
only ever knew you could add weight if it failed.
I guess I never questioned what all
Scott,
You mentioned you can use this to add a footer based on a per-user setting
as well? I think I have finally wrapped my head around this, but I would
like you to check my logic. (Maybe because it's been a LOOONG day...)
So I can set DOSENDERACTIONS ON in my global.cfg. In order to have a
Aaron,
What kind of NIC is in the 2000 box? This is a hot topic recently on
the IMail list. See the thread FIXED! Imail SLOW When Running On
Fast W2K Hardware.
Dev discovered that there definitely is a problem with newer faster
NICs, Windows 2000, and IMail 7.??. IPSwitch recommends
Aaron,
What kind of NIC is in the 2000 box? This is a hot topic recently on
the IMail list. See the thread FIXED! Imail SLOW When Running On
Fast W2K Hardware.
Dev discovered that there definitely is a problem with newer faster
NICs, Windows 2000, and IMail 7.??. IPSwitch recommends
Perfect! I, for one, am going to change my permanent email address to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] That should completely take care of my
personal spam problem! ;-)
--Todd.
- Original Message -
From: Sanford Whiteman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jay A. Caplan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January
How about trying robocopy.exe from the NT or 2000 resource kit? It has a
great MIRROR option that makes a complete copy in the target location
(deleting files that are gone, copying new and changed files, ignoring
unchanged files). It would probably be much faster.
And it also has an exclude
Phillip,
I see one flaw in this logic. It seems that you are assuming that all
mail admins are good mail admins as you say in the last paragraph.
In my experience, not very many of them are. And probably all the
good ones are on this list! ;-)
The typical scenerio I've seen is that for one
Here's an alternative I am using. REDIRECT was not an option when I built
this. So this is what I did.
In the IMail web interface (8383), I have added a couple pages which allow
me to change the user's spam filtering level to one of 3 choices (0=WARN,
1=SUBJECT, 2=BOUNCE). This web script
Scott,
I had a situation where there was an alias that pointed to another alias.
We did this because we wanted two aliases pointing to a group of about 5
addresses. And we did not want or need the overhead of a list. Nor did we
want to have to edit both aliases every time the group changed (it
Scott,
Can you remind me how much of the message body JunkMail scans with the
FILTER test? I had one pass through that was about 600 lines. The end had
the typical This is not spam, sent in compliance with, etc. which should
have been caught by my word filters, but it wasn't. Just for kicks,
back to their ISPs, then closed the proxies.
- Original Message -
From: Todd Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 7:26 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Oh gosh!
Pardon the ignorance...what is MONKEYPROXIES?
--Todd.
- Original
Jim,
Mine's rather short and contains no profanity, so I don't see any
problem posting it here...It's essentially what someone else posted to
the list a while back minus a few that were causing too many false
positives plus a few negative weights for legit sites that were
getting caught.
Have you tried TightVNC? (www.tightvnc.com) It was designed for slow
connections and has a few more things tweaked for better performance. And
it's also free. Worth a look...
TightVNC Features (from their web site):
Local cursor handling. Cursor movements do not generate screen updates any
Since someone brought it up... ;-)
A compromise that I would like is to have the whitelist in a seperate
file like the blacklist. I currently have an ASP web page where my
staff can update the white and black lists. The blacklist is
super-easy to write code to update, but whitelist is more
Is there any way to get JunkMail to look at individual user's
username.junkmail action file with Pro? From the declude log, it looks as
though it's only checking $default$.junkmail and *trying* to find a
listname.junkmail file which does not exist. I thought mabye turning on
outgoing actions
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 12:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Junkmail filtering for IMail lists...
Is there any way to get JunkMail to look at individual user's
username.junkmail action file
So do I understand that you want E-mail that goes to the list not to be
scanned, but then you would like your copy of it scanned? That is not
currently possible.
That's exactly how I would like it in an ideal world. You see, we set up
our default junkmail filters to only WARN. Then give
I just got a similar report from one of my users. And it DID fail various
tests that would have triggered BOUNCE if I didn't have my local server and
domain WHITELISTed.
I'm not sure how to proceed. If I take my own server and domain out of the
whitelist and these messages come through, my
?
--Todd.
- Original Message -
From: Todd Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:21 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam from 'myself'
I just got a similar report from one of my users. And it DID fail various
tests that would have triggered BOUNCE
Madscientist, Scott, etc
I've installed the trial of SortMonster Message Sniffer. And I must say it
catches a lot of stuff that the standard tests do not. I'm quite happy.
But I've also noticed a fair amount of false positives (partly due to my own
definition of junkmail, not a problem
That's what I need! Thanks Scott!
--Todd.
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 8:44 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] comments in BLACKLIST fromfile?
Is it possible to put comments in the fromfile used in a
I'm attempting to set up a couple black lists per the documentation. Can't
seem to get this to do anything...
1) In GLOBAL.CFG, added:
BLHOLD D:\IMail\Declude\BLHOLD.txt x 5 0
2) Created file called D:\IMail\Declude\BLHOLD.txt with contents:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] These guys are shadey.
3)
Scott,
You know...it must be the just too tired thing I mentioned. I hate when I
do stupid things like that. I know fromfile was there originally because
I cut/pasted directly from the manual web page. Somewhere along the line I
must have cut when I should've copied or something because it
Hi all,
Just installed JunkMail Pro with the default settings. Did some tests using
rsp set off and I'm getting the warning in the headers as expected. What
an awesome product, Scott!
Since I've received over 100 spam messages in the last 40 minutes (from the
log info), I'm quickly realizing
the
subjects to see what tests fail and look at the body to see what it actually
was. When I see something that shouldn't be there (or lots of them), I can
adjust the filters.
Thanks again for all your help!
--Todd.
- Original Message -
From: Todd Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
33 matches
Mail list logo
