RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 1.77i12 Bug: Aliases Counted in BYPASSMULTIRECP

2004-01-12 Thread R. Scott Perry
any news on this matter? The issues with SWITCHRECIP in 1.77i12 are still being investigated. Dito - any news with respect to the log entries in medium mode? I'm not aware of any issues here? -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 1.77i12 Bug: Aliases Counted in BYPASSMULTIRECP

2004-01-12 Thread Andy Schmidt
] 1.77i12 Bug: Aliases Counted in BYPASSMULTIRECP any news on this matter? The issues with SWITCHRECIP in 1.77i12 are still being investigated. Dito - any news with respect to the log entries in medium mode? I'm not aware of any issues here

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 1.77i12 Bug: Aliases Counted in BYPASSMULTIRECP

2004-01-12 Thread R. Scott Perry
You have been discussing slightly changing the new log behavior, by adding some information to improve parsing by log analyzers, possible making the abbreivated log an option feature for Mid mode, etc. That has been done (for 1.77i12). The Msg Failed lines now only appear in LOGLEVEL HIGH; at

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 1.77i12 Bug: Aliases Counted in BYPASSMULTIRECP

2004-01-12 Thread Andy Schmidt
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 09:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 1.77i12 Bug: Aliases Counted in BYPASSMULTIRECP You have been discussing slightly changing the new log behavior, by adding some information

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 1.77i12 Bug: Aliases Counted in BYPASSMULTIRECP

2004-01-12 Thread R. Scott Perry
Sorry - according to my records I was running 1.77i12 when I reported this behavior. And I was running LogLevel MID. The concern was, that the new, condensed format would break log analyzers and, some authors suggested that your one line summmary should start with a special string constant so

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 1.77i12 Bug: Aliases Counted in BYPASSMULTIRECP

2004-01-12 Thread Russ Uhte \(Lists\)
At 09:23 AM 1/12/2004, R. Scott Perry wrote: The *ONLY* changes that were made were [1] To move the Msg failed logging from LOGLEVEL LOW to LOGLEVEL HIGH, and [2] To add a one-line summary to LOGLEVEL LOW. No other changes were made. LOGLEVEL MID is not involved (except that it will also get

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 1.77i12 Bug: Aliases Counted in BYPASSMULTIRECP

2004-01-12 Thread Andy Schmidt
Scott: My config file reads (and always had): LOGFILE D:\imail\spool\dec.log LOGLEVELMID LOG_OK NONE That lead me to assume that I was running LogLevel MID. On January 7, I reported a problem with the log files after upgrading to version i12. See the enclosed log

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 1.77i12 Bug: Aliases Counted in BYPASSMULTIRECP

2004-01-12 Thread R. Scott Perry
I think I heard mention at one time for there to be a line added to the LOGLEVEL LOW for the total weight of the message. As anymore thought gone into this? Yes, the one-line summary is going to start with Tests failed [weight=WEIGHT]: .

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 1.77i12 Bug: Aliases Counted in BYPASSMULTIRECP

2004-01-12 Thread R. Scott Perry
My config file reads (and always had): LOGLEVELMID LOG_OK NONE That lead me to assume that I was running LogLevel MID. Correct (minus the OK messages). On January 7, I reported a problem with the log files after upgrading to version i12. See the enclosed log snippet - it clearly

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 1.77i12 Bug: Aliases Counted in BYPASSMULTIRECP

2004-01-12 Thread R. Scott Perry
any news on this matter? The issue with 1.77i12 and the bypasswhitelist option has been fixed in v1.77i15 at http://www.declude.com/interim . So if a user sends an E-mail with one recipient that is an alias that expands to 5 addresses, the bypasswhitelist option will only count it as one

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 1.77i12 Bug: Aliases Counted in BYPASSMULTIRECP

2004-01-12 Thread Frederick Samarelli
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 1.77i12 Bug: Aliases Counted in BYPASSMULTIRECP any news on this matter? The issue with 1.77i12 and the bypasswhitelist option has been fixed in v1.77i15 at http://www.declude.com/interim . So if a user sends an E-mail with one recipient that is an alias

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 1.77i12 Bug: Aliases Counted in BYPASSMULTIRECP

2004-01-11 Thread Andy Schmidt
Title: Message Hi Scott: any news on this matter? Dito - any news with respect to the log entries in medium mode? Best RegardsAndy SchmidtPhone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)Fax: +1 201 934-9206 -Original Message-From: Andy Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

[Declude.JunkMail] 1.77i12 Bug: Aliases Counted in BYPASSMULTIRECP

2004-01-08 Thread Andy Schmidt
Title: Message Hi Scott: I just went back to i8. Somewhere between i8 and i12, the handling of aliases broke. Situation: a) User sends a single email to a single alias:"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" b) The alias distributes to 12 mailboxes c) Declude (with Interim I12) counts it as 12 recipients

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 1.77i12 Bug: Aliases Counted in BYPASSMULTIRECP

2004-01-08 Thread R. Scott Perry
I just went back to i8. Somewhere between i8 and i12, the handling of aliases broke. Situation: a) User sends a single email to a single alias: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] b) The alias distributes to 12 mailboxes c) Declude (with Interim I12) counts it as 12 recipients when