Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ANN: SMTP Gateway

2006-01-27 Thread Don Brown
Scott was not assaulted on the Imail list and even if he was, it is not relevant to what is appropriate and acceptable on this list. Never-the-less, Scott had a working relationship with Imail and Declude was not a competitor to Imail until Imail introduced their own Spam solution (which was poor

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ANN: SMTP Gateway

2006-01-27 Thread Darin Cox
] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 3:20 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ANN: SMTP Gateway Scott was not assaulted on the Imail list and even if he was, it is not relevant to what is appropriate and acceptable on this list. Never-the-less, Scott had a working

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ANN: SMTP Gateway

2006-01-26 Thread Brian
Anyone willing to share more info on this? Timetable? Thanks, Brian T. - Original Message - From: John T (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 9:33 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ANN: SMTP Gateway Plans for a gateway version

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ANN: SMTP Gateway

2006-01-26 Thread Lists - Declude JunkMail
Posted To: Lists - Declude JunkMail Conversation: [Declude.JunkMail] ANN: SMTP Gateway Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ANN: SMTP Gateway I can't believe what is apparently permissible on this list. Has no one realized that this product is a commercial competitor to IMail or SmarterMail

[Declude.JunkMail] ANN: SMTP Gateway

2006-01-25 Thread Brian
Hi Everyone, A couple of weeks ago I posted a message regarding our SMTP Gateway. Several users responded and have been using the beta version with no major issues. I appreciate the responses. We now have the Alligate SMTP Gateway available for evaluation for anyone that is interested. We

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ANN: SMTP Gateway

2006-01-25 Thread Sanford Whiteman
I can't believe what is apparently permissible on this list. Has no one realized that this product is a commercial competitor to IMail or SmarterMail, with no relevance to Declude? Don't try that mail is stopped before Declude has to deal with it attempt at association. It is what it

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ANN: SMTP Gateway

2006-01-25 Thread Markus Gufler
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 12:35 AM To: Brian Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ANN: SMTP Gateway I can't believe what is apparently permissible on this list. Has no one realized that this product is a commercial

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ANN: SMTP Gateway

2006-01-25 Thread Nick Hayer
Sanford Whiteman wrote: Has no one realized that this product is a commercial competitor to IMail or SmarterMail, with no relevance to Declude? I missed the post. .I actually had to look in my deleted emails to find the email to which you were referring.. Obviously you are right - I

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ANN: SMTP Gateway

2006-01-25 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Sandy, I agree with you. That fact that I was going to be silent has to do with my perception of the users on this list, as compared to other lists that I participate on that I am well know to posts rants. The fact of the matter is I was one of the ones heavily (to my knowledge) involved in

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ANN: SMTP Gateway

2006-01-25 Thread Matt
Judging by the responses, I suppose that it is inappropriate, at least without approaching Barry about promoting this product here. I don't however believe that the intentions were to snipe customers away from Declude, but instead to provide a value-added solution to those of us that require

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ANN: SMTP Gateway

2006-01-25 Thread John T \(Lists\)
: [Declude.JunkMail] ANN: SMTP Gateway Judging by the responses, I suppose that it is inappropriate, at least without approaching Barry about promoting this product here. I don't however believe that the intentions were to snipe customers away from Declude, but instead to provide a value-added

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] ANN: SMTP Gateway

2006-01-25 Thread Sanford Whiteman
I don't however believe that the intentions were to snipe customers away from Declude, No? Not to get some people out of the Declude upgrade path, so they could spend their limited budgets elsewhere? Not to upsell a gateway solution that takes the heat off a Declude infrastructure? The

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ANN: SMTP Gateway

2006-01-25 Thread Evans Martin
PM To: Brian Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ANN: SMTP Gateway I can't believe what is apparently permissible on this list. Has no one realized that this product is a commercial competitor to IMail or SmarterMail, with no relevance to Declude? Don't try that mail is stopped before