Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SA help -

2004-11-10 Thread Nick Hayer
On 9 Nov 2004 at 22:54, Bill Landry wrote: Nick, I cannot think of any RHSBLs that would be candidates for urirhssub, other than the SURBLs that currently use bitmasked responses. I did not have any in mind but I was looking over the setups and this scenerio came to mind.. Thanks for you

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SA help -

2004-11-09 Thread Nick
On 9 Nov 2004 at 11:12, Bill Landry wrote: Bill, How do you handle if a particular rhsbl returns multiple return codes like 127.0.0 2; 127.0.0 4, etc and you want to pick which one to use - is it: urirhsbl URIBL_EX multiple.example.com. A 127.0.0.4 or urirhssub URIBL_EX multiple.example.com.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SA help -

2004-11-09 Thread Bill Landry
- Original Message - From: Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED] How do you handle if a particular rhsbl returns multiple return codes like 127.0.0 2; 127.0.0 4, etc and you want to pick which one to use - is it: urirhsbl URIBL_EX multiple.example.com. A 127.0.0.4 or urirhssub URIBL_EX