RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF Issue

2008-09-03 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 9:12 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF Issue Seems all is OK thank you al for your help Serge - Original Message - From: Andy Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 2

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF Issue

2008-09-01 Thread Andy Schmidt
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Serge Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2008 10:18 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF Issue Hi all I have som SPF issues It was working fine some times back I use Mixrosoft dns I have (same as parent)Text v=spf1 mx ip4:217.64.107.106 -all mail

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF Issue

2008-09-01 Thread Pete McNeil
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com S Sent: Monday, September 01, 2008 12:41 PM S Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF Issue What is the issue? What error message? Was it bounced mail? What did the NDR say? I could be a recipient trying to forward mail to another server, or an end-user trying to send

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF Issue

2008-09-01 Thread Pete McNeil
(unless they have cached information). S - Original Message - S From: Andy Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] S To: declude.junkmail@declude.com S Sent: Monday, September 01, 2008 12:41 PM S Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF Issue What is the issue? What error message? Was it bounced mail

Re[3]: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF Issue

2008-09-01 Thread Sanford Whiteman
The mx should not be naked. Actually, naked mx mechanism is fine. So is -all (deny-all being preferable to anything looser). The cefib.com TXT record is a valid SPF record. The problem is likely to be an NXDOMAIN received by DNSStuff, perhaps due to routing problems. Other remote

[Declude.JunkMail] SPF Issue

2008-08-31 Thread Serge
Hi all I have som SPF issues It was working fine some times back I use Mixrosoft dns I have (same as parent)Text v=spf1 mx ip4:217.64.107.106 -all mailText v=spf1 mx ip4:217.64.107.106 -all What is wrong with above ? TIA --- This E-mail came from the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF Issue

2008-08-31 Thread Sanford Whiteman
I have som SPF issues What issues? Did you validate your TXT record at openspf? --Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SpamAssassin plugs into Declude!

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF issue

2004-10-01 Thread A. Clausen
- Original Message - From: Imail Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 11:47 Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF issue I've been just begging for motivation to upgrade from 7.15 to 8.x, and so far, the only good reason I've found

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF issue

2004-09-30 Thread Imail Admin
and just work around the absence of WHITELIST AUTH. Ben Bednarz BC Web - Original Message - From: Kevin Bilbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 4:42 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF issue No, the probem you are having is with your own

[Declude.JunkMail] SPF issue

2004-09-29 Thread David Dresler
I thought i had a handle on this SPF stuff, but i think i've got something wrong in my understanding. I've set up my SPF record for our domain with the following record: choicenet1.com v=spf1 ip4:207.170.239.11 ip4:207.170.239.4 a mx -all From my understanding of this, the ip4's are

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF issue

2004-09-29 Thread R. Scott Perry
Now, my dialup customers are on a different subnet and log into our imail server using smtp auth. When they send emails out, shouldn't the ip addy of the email then take on the ip addy of the email server in the eyes of the receiving mail server? No. Otherwise, it would defeat the purpose of

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF issue

2004-09-29 Thread Kevin Bilbee
, September 29, 2004 4:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF issue Unfortunately i'm running imail 7.07 and it doesn't look like we'll be going to 8.x anytime soon. So, if i change my spf record to include the ip pool of my dialup users, i should be ok, correct