Re: [Declude.JunkMail] dynamic.rhs.mailpolice.com config

2004-05-14 Thread Scott Fisher
Looking at yesterday's numbers: About 2200 mails after I added the new MailPolice tests. I had 363 matches on the MailPolice-REVDNS. 362 spam, 1 not spam. The bad news is that all 362 were already over my hold weight. I had 281 matches on the MailPolice-HELO. 281 spam. All 281 MailPolice-HELO's

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] dynamic.rhs.mailpolice.com config

2004-05-14 Thread Matt
Scott, I don't think the results that you found are are that bad actually. Just because something is over your hold weight doesn't mean adding more points isn't valuable. I split my held messages into a range of 10-24 and another that is 25+. I've managed to get about 97% to 98% of the spam

[Declude.JunkMail] dynamic.rhs.mailpolice.com config

2004-05-13 Thread Matt
Here's a working config for MailPolice's dynamic test (PPP/DSL/cable) that test's both the reverse DNS entry and the HELO entry (zombie spamware often uses the reverse DNS entry for the HELO). MAILPOLICE-DYNA-REVDNSdnsbl %REVDNS%.dynamic.rhs.mailpolice.com127.0.0.200