How about a per-domain config... You can turn off AUTOWHITELIST for that
customer.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2008 11:31 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail]
OK, please ignore. This strange message was the result of our issues that
we had over the weekend.
Thanks to Linda at Declude, we are pretty much back to normal (or as close
as we can get)!
Todd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd
While I can't *guarantee* that it was working right with higher than
10 returns from spamd, here is what I see now.
'-et 10' means 'return an exit code of 10 if the SPAMD total weight
was greater than 10.' I like to look at it in terms of what SPAMC32
returns, not anything it can't
...
It appears this is at least partially on the SA side. Any ideas??
Thanks,
Geoff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 10:31 AM
To: Geoff Varney
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Problems with SPAMC32
This sounds like an awesome idea. If
there is anything that I can do or if you need any programming done to support
it, please dont hesitate to contact me.
Thanks,
Evans Martin
EVANS MARTIN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HOSTING: http://www.martek.net
PROGRAMMING: http://www.martekware.com
Known problem as posted on the Imail list. I actually sent out a broadcast
earlier informing them of possible problems.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran Jovanovic
Sent: Friday, July 08,
And me not monitoring the imail list. What were the problems (in summary)?
-Original Message-
From: John Tolmachoff \(Lists\) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 14:49:52
To:Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Problems with Network Solutions DNS Servers
@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Problems with Network Solutions DNS
Servers
Known problem as posted on the Imail list. I actually sent out a broadcast
earlier informing them of possible problems.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
: [Declude.JunkMail] Problems with Network Solutions DNS
Servers
And me not monitoring the imail list. What were the problems (in summary)?
-Original Message-
From: John Tolmachoff \(Lists\) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 14:49:52
To:Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Problems with Network Solutions DNS
Servers
And me not monitoring the imail list. What were the problems (in summary)?
-Original Message-
From: John Tolmachoff \(Lists\) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 14:49:52
This appears to be an issue with your IMail settings. It is unsafe to
use Mail From rejection for domains that fail a lookup unless you expect
everyone else's DNS to be operational and accessible 100% of the time
and perfectly configured. My suggestion would be to turn this off in
the IMail
i use a combo-filter DOMAINFAELSCHER, there are only 3 lines in this filter:
TESTSFAILED END CONTAINS SERVEROK
TESTSFAILED END NOTCONTAINS DIREKTANUNS
TESTSFAILED 5 CONTAINS SPAMDOMAINS
Are you running the latest interim release (which is required for
NOTCONTAINS to work)?
It appears that you may have forgotten to mention the TEXT of the error
message that appears in the logs. Knowing what error is reported may be the
key in pin-pointing the cause.
Best Regards
Andy
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This
- 570 - 1765
Fax: 434 - 572 - 1981
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Andy Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 12:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Problems with Errors in Logs
It appears that you may have forgotten
The messages are as follows:
Error; failure opening (message ID) in the declude junkmail file
Error opening mime file (message ID) in the declude antivirus file
Sorry for the generic message, but the log files are gone.
The best way to determine what is happening here is to use the debug mode.
- 572 - 1981
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 12:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Problems with Errors in Logs
The messages are as follows:
Error; failure opening (message ID
R. Scott Perry wrote:
Again, REDIRECT works fine in username.JunkMail files, but not in
$default$.JunkMail. Might it be a bug in 1.70 beta?
It looks like you are correct that there is a bug in the 1.70 beta.
There is an interim release 1.70i20 at
The problem is: REDIRECT doesn't seem to work in the $default$.JunkMail
files. However, it works fine in username.domain.tld.JunkMail files.
You may already know this, but just in case: The REDIRECT command will
only work in the configuration file that Declude JunkMail uses for a
recipient.
R. Scott Perry wrote:
The problem is: REDIRECT doesn't seem to work in the
$default$.JunkMail files. However, it works fine in
username.domain.tld.JunkMail files.
You may already know this, but just in case: The REDIRECT command will
only work in the configuration file that Declude JunkMail
We have a \IMail\Declude\$default$.JunkMail file that basically ignores
all spam tests. Then, for customers who want spam filtering, we have
IMail\Declude\domain1.tld, \IMail\Declude\domain2.tld etc.
What I would recommend that you try in this case is to have the REDIRECT
lines in the
Again, REDIRECT works fine in username.JunkMail files, but not in
$default$.JunkMail. Might it be a bug in 1.70 beta?
It looks like you are correct that there is a bug in the 1.70 beta. There
is an interim release 1.70i20 at
http://www.declude.com/release/170i/declude.exe that should take
Yes,
I am only able to reply now.
I spent all day to extract email addresses (from/to/subject) from the
Declude.log and then write a mail-merge to send customized notifications to
each sender and recipient - 5,800 in all.
Once I turned on the WeightRange - it deleted 99% of the incoming
Once I turned on the WeightRange - it deleted 99% of the incoming messages -
and I never noticed it for QUITE a while because a FEW made it through.
07/11/2002 00:02:05 Q03370ca200f0ae47 nWEIGHT10:19 nWEIGHT8:9 . Total
weight = 28
07/11/2002 00:02:05 Q03370ca200f0ae47 Msg failed WEIGHTKILL
PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 2:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Problems with weightrange - CAUTION
Once I turned on the WeightRange - it deleted 99% of the incoming
messages -
and I never noticed it for QUITE a while because
, February 08, 2002 8:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Problems with SpamReview Software
I've had some similar problems so I quit using it.
The problem seems to be related to the amount of content in the folder.
I
have a lot of captured spam.
_M
| -Original Message
25 matches
Mail list logo
