Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamD/SpamC for Declude

2004-01-13 Thread Russ Uhte \(Lists\)
At 05:05 PM 1/12/2004, Sanford Whiteman wrote: I guess that was a noble try... but it didn't work. Well, it probably worked, just not enough. :) Yeah, I'll buy that! :) I'm going to try to separate the spamd/spamc processes and see how that goes. That will alleviate the utilization

Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamD/SpamC for Declude

2004-01-12 Thread Sanford Whiteman
I guess that was a noble try... but it didn't work. Well, it probably worked, just not enough. :) I'm going to try to separate the spamd/spamc processes and see how that goes. That will alleviate the utilization issue, for sure. Depending on the age of your server, you should think