[Declude.JunkMail] Declude 1.82 deleting whitelisted e-mail -

2005-05-19 Thread Marc Catuogno
Here are the log entries of the missing message: 05:18 09:11 SMTPD(04B8) Authenticated [EMAIL PROTECTED], session treated as local. 05:18 09:11 SMTPD(0B170142) [68.236.184.7] MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05:18 09:11 SMTPD(0B170142) [68.236.184.7] RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05:18

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spool and Overflow Folders...

2005-05-19 Thread Will
Just to be certain I have had the spool problem, but diag only produces one of the lines in question. Im assuming that I do not make a change, correct? Declude 2.0.6 (C) Copyright 2000-2004 Computerized Horizons. Compilation Platform: IMail -- Information JunkMail: Config file

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spool and Overflow Folders...

2005-05-19 Thread Ralph Krausse
No Will, that configuration looks fine. You want to see 1, just not 3. You shouldnt have to do anything. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Will Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 9:16 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]

[Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Features (or lack thereof?)

2005-05-19 Thread Jonathan
So, we've been looking quite a bit at SmarterMail for the past few months ... everyone in here seems to rant and rave about it, wishing they had switched sooner. However, when I really dig into it, it seems like it's missing a lot of common functionality. Here's a couple examples that I

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Verizon Faced With Lawsuits Over Blocking eMail From Foreign IP Addresses

2005-05-19 Thread Don Brown
One of the expenses of living in a democracy is that the courts are open to everyone; even to the spammers and the other parasites of society. It's not cause for alarm when it's recognized that there will always be those who take unfair advantage and abuse privilege. That reality is a good reason

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Features (or lack thereof?)

2005-05-19 Thread Michael Graveen
At 01:08 PM 5/19/2005, you wrote: So, we've been looking quite a bit at SmarterMail for the past few months ... everyone in here seems to rant and rave about it, wishing they had switched sooner. However, when I really dig into it, it seems like it's missing a lot of common functionality.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Features (or lack thereof?)

2005-05-19 Thread Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango
I totally agree. Here is a link with some of the features missing http://forums.smartertools.com/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=8767 However its webmail is very nice. I hope we have that in IMAIL. Luis Arango -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Features (or lack thereof?)

2005-05-19 Thread Jonathan
Rats. I was hoping I was totally off-base, and all these features were actually hidden in the program or configs somewhere. Not really sure how thrilled I am about moving our customers' servers over without some of these items. Jonathan Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango wrote: I