Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MX, DNS and other weird stuff

2012-11-27 Thread Sanford Whiteman
> The link you provide is what I found before: it's a Windows port but it's > uncompiled. Lacking a compiler, I was looking for something precompiled. Ah, didn't notice that -- maybe search for a p0f 2.x binary because that's the last time I used it. I have a 2.04 binary that I'll send you off li

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MX, DNS and other weird stuff

2012-11-27 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Update: NetworkMiner (http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/networkminer/index.php?title=NetworkMiner) uses the p0f OS fingerprint database and should work for you. -- S. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, a

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Fw: Deciphering Comcast reply on weird DNS stuff

2012-11-27 Thread Sanford Whiteman
> In the end, he seems to be saying that we have a name server > giving wrong results, which would make sense, except I can't figure > out which name servers he's referring to. You'll see below where he > says "the NS0 name server points to NS1 and that will point to > mail2.bcwebhost.net and you

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Fw: Deciphering Comcast reply on weird DNS stuff

2012-11-27 Thread SM Admin
I remember Len Conrad from way back when, and I believe he could "hand him his" Where would there be a DNS-centric list or forum where Len hangs out? Thanks, Ben - Original Message - From: Sanford Whiteman To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 4:3

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Fw: Deciphering Comcast reply on weird DNS stuff

2012-11-27 Thread SM Admin
Hi Sandy, Actually, you did catch something. The section that starts with "Authority". In his email he says "Answer ns0.xname.org" which I take to mean that he is getting that authorotative response from nso0.xname.org and not ns1.xname.org as you assume below. Which doesn't make sense to me

Re: Fw: [Declude.JunkMail] Fw: Deciphering Comcast reply on weird DNS stuff

2012-11-27 Thread Sanford Whiteman
> To answer Shaun's question, you'll see that we only have ns0 and > ns2 for xname.org and ns1.xname.org is removed. So it shouldn't be > a problem. It isn't close to a problem. It isn't helping matters to have your ostensible allies misread one hostname as another! > Actually, I tried nslookup

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Fw: Deciphering Comcast reply on weird DNS stuff

2012-11-27 Thread SM Admin
Hi Sandy, Actually, you did catch something. The section that starts with "Authority". In his email he says "Answer ns0.xname.org" which I take to mean that he is getting that authorotative response from nso0.xname.org and not ns1.xname.org as you assume below. Which doesn't make sense to me

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Fw: Deciphering Comcast reply on weird DNS stuff

2012-11-27 Thread Sanford Whiteman
> Actually, you did catch something. The section that starts with > "Authority". In his email he says "Answer ns0.xname.org" which I > take to mean that he is getting that authorotative response from > nso0.xname.org and not ns1.xname.org as you assume below. It means "ns0.xname.org" is part of

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Fw: Deciphering Comcast reply on weird DNS stuff

2012-11-27 Thread Sanford Whiteman
> I remember Len Conrad from way back when, and I believe he could > "hand him his" Where would there be a DNS-centric list or forum where > Len hangs out? Maybe the big ISC BIND newsgroup or something? But it doesn't have to be him, it could be someone on the DNSStuff forums, too. -- S.