[Declude.Virus] Postmaster notice sent to postmaster@copyall_account

2003-01-23 Thread John Tolmachoff
I am noticing that on domains that are not local on Imail, but the server is acting as a gateway for, that when viruses are found, the Postmaster.eml is sent to postmaster@copyall_account. (The copy all mail option in Imail is enabled.) As that is not a valid account that Imail recognizes, it is

[Declude.Virus] Conflicting Encoding Vulnerability

2003-01-23 Thread Steve Flook
Scott / list, I'm wondering if I can somehow disable this test, or possibly weaken it etc as I'm getting a couple of false positives from a particular client that is sending emails to herself from her AOL address. A declude -diag shows I'm running v1.65. The headers are below. I can send more

RE: [Declude.Virus] Conflicting Encoding Vulnerability

2003-01-23 Thread John Tolmachoff
In case Scott does not answer right away, can you post a log snippet? John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.Virus- [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of

Re: [Declude.Virus] Conflicting Encoding Vulnerability

2003-01-23 Thread R. Scott Perry
I'm wondering if I can somehow disable this test, or possibly weaken it etc Your only option is to disable vulnerability detection completely, which will almost certainly allow future viruses through. When it comes to vulnerabilities, it is best to just fix the problem. The headers are

RE: [Declude.Virus] Conflicting Encoding Vulnerability

2003-01-23 Thread Steve Flook
Sure - should of thought to give that on the first shot... My log level was set to MID. I have set the log level to HIGH now for the time being. Here is 2 of them that were sent back to back. 01/23/2003 09:35:18 Qfda5036201b8bde7 Conflicting Encoding vulnerability in [7bit]. 01/23/2003

RE: [Declude.Virus] Conflicting Encoding Vulnerability

2003-01-23 Thread R. Scott Perry
Sure - should of thought to give that on the first shot... Actually, I should have caught this without looking at the logs -- for some reason, I was thinking of a different issue. The problem is: --=_NextPart_000_0005_01C2045D.33A4E770 Content-Type: text/plain;

RE: [Declude.Virus] server-based encryption

2003-01-23 Thread Declude Forum
Keep in mind, it would only apply for certain destination addresses, not all outgoing messages. My company is very interested in this ability. What would it take to get this done? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jonathan Sent:

RE: [Declude.Virus] Postmaster notice sent to postmaster@copyall_ accountaccount

2003-01-23 Thread Steve Flook
Thanks Scott - man your on it! Steve -Original Message- From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 11:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Postmaster notice sent to postmaster@copyall_account I am noticing that on domains that

RE: [Declude.Virus] Conflicting Encoding Vulnerability

2003-01-23 Thread Steve Flook
hmm ok, thanks for the information. Now I'm wondering how I can explain THAT to the client :) Steve -Original Message- From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 11:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Conflicting Encoding

RE: [Declude.Virus] server-based encryption

2003-01-23 Thread Doug McKee
We actually can offer this service at this time. Contact me off list. [EMAIL PROTECTED] I apologize for the blatant sales plug. Doug McKee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Declude Forum Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 10:27 AM To: [EMAIL