Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG

2008-06-23 Thread Bonno Bloksma
Hi, (Open mail request) Dear Declude people. I have asked this before and with the current spam levels kan we PLEASE have this feature now ASAP? We all want to use AVAFTERJM but could you PLEASE make it scan all mail which is not deleted? If that is a to big step at first becasue of all the

[Declude.Virus] automated response

2008-06-23 Thread dave.czoper
I will be on vacation 6/23 through 6/27 and will not have access to email. = However, I will be available by cell phone if needed @ 412-418-8008. Earl Dean ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) from Oxford International will be help= ing out the IT department until I return. Please see John Hultgren or Earl =

RE: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG

2008-06-23 Thread David Barker
Dear Bonno, It is not that we can't do this. We have chosen not to do this otherwise your users will end up with viruses in their junkmail folders. AVAFTERJM will skip messages on DELETE and HOLD actions only. David From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG

2008-06-23 Thread Bonno Bloksma
Hi David, Could you explain this: We have chosen not to do this otherwise your users will end up with viruses in their junkmail folders By NOT scanning held junkmail the virus WILL end up in a users mailbox if I have to reque the mail because it was a FP. Of course you don't have to scan

RE: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG

2008-06-23 Thread David Barker
Correct if you send held email directly to the spool there is a potential for a virus to bypass if running AVAFTERJM this is why it is important to correct the issue that caused the false positive then reprocess via Declude. OR alternately ensure you virus scan your HOLD folders. If you are

RE: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG

2008-06-23 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
For what it's worth, I never move messages from HOLD to SPOOL. When I do move false positives out, I fix the problem in my configuration, so that the same circumstance doesn't happen again, and then I move the files from the HOLD to the PROC folder. By re-scanning them, they get virus scanned

RE: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG

2008-06-23 Thread Kevin Bilbee
I have complained about this for a while now. This process of fix the configuration the place in the proc folder only works if you are constantly pouring through your hold folders. We do not do that. We send an email to our users with the message they have in their hold. They then have the

RE: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG

2008-06-23 Thread David Barker
I will see what we can do for a new directive for the HOLD to be excluded or included by the admin. David From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 2:17 PM To: declude.virus@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs

Re[2]: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG

2008-06-23 Thread Pete McNeil
On Monday, June 23, 2008, 2:16:47 PM, Kevin wrote: I have complained about this for a while now. This process of fix the configuration the place in the proc folder only works if you are constantly pouring through your hold folders. We do not do that. We send an email to our users with

Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG

2008-06-23 Thread Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
One side note - if this feature is added please make sure this feature is configurable so we can disable it if we choose (which I would). I have customers who hold all spam for a certain period of time and than we delete. If anything needs to be returned to the queue it is scanned manually