Re: [Declude.Virus] Bagle now at U

2004-03-26 Thread E. Ballerini
John Tolmachoff (Lists) wrote: 5 letters left. Then we'll get W32/Bagle.aa, W32/Bagle.ab etc, like we had with Yaha. Erminio --- [This E-mail has been scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came

[Declude.Virus] Bagle.U from open relays

2004-03-26 Thread Rick Davidson
Maybe some hard evidence this was spread by spammers At around 3:40AM to 4:00AM ET I caught over 125 Bagle.U viruses in my spam folder that catches mail held by the CBL blacklist, they were all sent through open relays like spam and were caught because the hosts they were sent through were

RE: [Declude.Virus] netsky p ?

2004-03-26 Thread Douglas Cohn
Is there any thought about changing this? IE removing the attachment and passing the email through. Or is the case I gave very rare?? IE a legitimate email with the Quarantined Attachment.txt. And if not blocked it will come through, I am aware as I do not block them. Why add Quarantined

[Declude.Virus] Banning files by size

2004-03-26 Thread Scott Fisher
I was researching a pif file that got banned today and found it to be a length=0 file. I remember a discussion that the Netsky variant was generating these 0 length files. I wondering if an Declude change to give the option to ban length 0 files would be any good. While we are on the topic of

[Declude.Virus] How to stop BANNAME notifications in BANnotify.eml

2004-03-26 Thread Scott Fisher
I know Matt @ Mailpure has suggested this in the past. I would also like to vote for this feature in an upcoming release. Matt's original e-mail: I have a problem. I just noticed that since adding the line BANNAME DELETED0.TXT to my Virus.cfg, my BANnotify.eml file is bouncing notifications in

[Declude.Virus] BANEXT EXE

2004-03-26 Thread Jay Calvert
Hi all we just had a case where an email was banned because Declude said it had an exe in the email, when it only had a TXT. What happened here? Thanks. --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

RE: [Declude.Virus] netsky p ?

2004-03-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
Is there any thought about changing this? IE removing the attachment and passing the email through. That is not likely to happen soon, as it requires MIME encoding (which Declude doesn't do at all -- it only does MIME decoding). -Scott ---

RE: [Declude.Virus] BANEXT EXE

2004-03-26 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Double check the D file. There might be more than one attachment. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay Calvert Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 8:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Declude.Virus] How to stop BANNAME notifications in BANnotify.eml

2004-03-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
I have a problem. I just noticed that since adding the line BANNAME DELETED0.TXT to my Virus.cfg, my BANnotify.eml file is bouncing notifications in response to these files. I tried SKIPIFVIRUSNAMEHAS DELETED0.TXT, but that didn't work. The problem of course is that these files aren't in fact

Re: [Declude.Virus] BANEXT EXE

2004-03-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
Hi all we just had a case where an email was banned because Declude said it had an exe in the email, when it only had a TXT. What happened here? What happened is that either it contained an .exe file, or it had multiple extensions (in which case Declude Virus assumes the worst, that it is an

Re: [Declude.Virus] BANEXT EXE

2004-03-26 Thread Jay Calvert
Scott, I just sent it to you, please look for it, it came from our systems account. Jay - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 9:17 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] BANEXT EXE Hi all we just had a case where an

Re: [Declude.Virus] BANEXT EXE

2004-03-26 Thread Rick Davidson
I have several examples of that from last night as well, all the txt attachments were anti-virus generated attachments 03/25/2004 19:11:00 Q751409530072c4c8 MIME file: DELETED0.TXT [quoted-printable; Length=113 Checksum=12852] 03/25/2004 19:11:00 Q751409530072c4c8 Banning file deleted0.txt.

Re: [Declude.Virus] BANEXT EXE

2004-03-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
I have several examples of that from last night as well, all the txt attachments were anti-virus generated attachments 03/25/2004 19:11:00 Q751409530072c4c8 MIME file: DELETED0.TXT [quoted-printable; Length=113 Checksum=12852] 03/25/2004 19:11:00 Q751409530072c4c8 Banning file deleted0.txt.

Re: [Declude.Virus] BANEXT EXE

2004-03-26 Thread Jay Calvert
Scott, Did you receive the second email? Jay - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 9:39 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] BANEXT EXE I have several examples of that from last night as well, all the txt

Re: [Declude.Virus] BANEXT EXE

2004-03-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
Hi all we just had a case where an email was banned because Declude said it had an exe in the email, when it only had a TXT. What happened here? The problem here is that the mail client (a program whose name is as poor as its MIME handling: Mail A.01.77) is giving out 2 different names for the

Re: [Declude.Virus] BANEXT EXE

2004-03-26 Thread Jay Calvert
But if this is the case, how will a file be caught if somebody renames a .zip to a .zio? Will declude know the difference. Would be wonderful if it did! Jay - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 10:50 AM Subject:

Re: [Declude.Virus] BANEXT EXE

2004-03-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
The problem here is that the mail client (a program whose name is as poor as its MIME handling: Mail A.01.77) is giving out 2 different names for the file. In one location, it calls the file EPM11002.FILES.CANJET, in the other location it calls it EPM11002.TXT. While Declude Virus knows

Re: [Declude.Virus] BANEXT EXE

2004-03-26 Thread Jay Calvert
I was just thinking, is there a way instead of having BANEXT, to allowed EXT? We want to cut down on employees bypassing the filters by renaming an attachment Maybe if it isn't in the list it is held for review Will this stop blah.txt.exe files though if we wanted .txt's to get through Jay

[Declude.Virus] New Virus Alert mailing list for urgent virus information

2004-03-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
FYI, at the request of our customers, we have just set a new mailing list called Virus Alert. The list is designed to let our customers know as soon as we find out about new, fast-spreading viruses. The goal is to help you be as protected as possible before virus definitions are updated.

Re: [Declude.Virus] New Virus Alert mailing list for urgent virus information

2004-03-26 Thread Darin Cox
Sounds good. Now the question of the day is...how do we subscribe? Darin. - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 3:29 PM Subject: [Declude.Virus] New Virus Alert mailing list for urgent virus information FYI, at

Re: [Declude.Virus] New Virus Alert mailing list for urgent virus information

2004-03-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
Sounds good. Now the question of the day is...how do we subscribe? Oops. :) You can send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with subscribe virusalert Your Name in the body of the E-mail. -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam

RE: [Declude.Virus] New Virus Alert mailing list for urgent virus information

2004-03-26 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Thanks. Oh, how does one sign up on this list? John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 12:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

RE: [Declude.Virus] New Virus Alert mailing list for urgent virus information

2004-03-26 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
You can send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with subscribe virusalert Your Name in the body of the E-mail. BUT, that will not work for everything, such as a alpha/numeric pager or a cell phone which only had SMS on it, not e-mail. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You

RE: [Declude.Virus] New Virus Alert mailing list for urgent virus information

2004-03-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
You can send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with subscribe virusalert Your Name in the body of the E-mail. BUT, that will not work for everything, such as a alpha/numeric pager or a cell phone which only had SMS on it, not e-mail. In that case, you can just E-mail me the address you want added

RE: [Declude.Virus] New Virus Alert mailing list for urgent virus information

2004-03-26 Thread Tim Northrup
You can send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with subscribe virusalert Your Name in the body of the E-mail. BUT, that will not work for everything, such as a alpha/numeric pager or a cell phone which only had SMS on it, not e-mail. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For

RE: [Declude.Virus] New Virus Alert mailing list for urgent virus information

2004-03-26 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
BUT, that will not work for everything, such as a alpha/numeric pager or a cell phone which only had SMS on it, not e-mail. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You Most cell phone services provide an email address for sending SMS messages to your phone. ATT for

Re: [Declude.Virus] New Virus Alert mailing list for urgent virus information

2004-03-26 Thread Darin Cox
We set up emergency support aliases for exactly this purpose. They send to phones/pagers and copy standard support aliases. So you could create one and subscribe to the virus alert list with it. Darin. - Original Message - From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL

Re: [Declude.Virus] New Virus Alert mailing list for urgent virus information

2004-03-26 Thread Dale McDiarmid
Excellent idea. Thank you very much. D. At 01:29 PM 3/26/2004, you wrote: FYI, at the request of our customers, we have just set a new mailing list called Virus Alert. The list is designed to let our customers know as soon as we find out about new, fast-spreading viruses. The goal is to

Re: [Declude.Virus] New Virus Alert mailing list for urgent virus information

2004-03-26 Thread serge
we need a similar emergency list for spam tests going down, requiring changes in global.cfg - Original Message - From: Dale McDiarmid [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 10:37 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] New Virus Alert mailing list for urgent virus

RE: [Declude.Virus] New Virus Alert mailing list for urgent virus information

2004-03-26 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
we need a similar emergency list for spam tests going down, requiring changes in Global.cfg Not really, as those (in the past) have not occurred so rapidly that a problem occurred. There is almost always a few days notice and is discussed on the JunkMail list. John Tolmachoff

Re: [Declude.Virus] New Virus Alert mailing list for urgent virus information

2004-03-26 Thread serge
For those of us who are not full time postmasters, we may spend days, sometime more than a couple of weeks without reading these lists. and when we come back, we usualy do not have the time to catch up so an emergency junkmail list would be welcomed, not necessarly to route to sms/pager, but at

RE: [Declude.Virus] New Virus Alert mailing list for urgent virus information

2004-03-26 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
For those of us who are not full time postmasters, we may spend days, sometime more than a couple of weeks without reading these lists. and when we come back, we usualy do not have the time to catch up so an emergency junkmail list would be welcomed, not necessarly to route to sms/pager, but