virus.cfg:
BANEXT PIF
If you also want to block them in zips and encrypted zip:
BANZIPEXTS ON
BANEZIPEXTS ON
Uwe
- Original Message -
From: Dan Geiser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 3:26 PM
Subject: [Declude.Virus] Blocking PIF
Darin,
Would you add these to virus.cfg? Similir to BANEXT?
Thanks,
Dan
- Original Message -
From: Darin Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 5:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] New Virus Strain Pounding my systems
For those of us
I opened the zip file and it contained one file called 1.cpl (without the
quotes). Some sort of malicious Control Panel applet?
- Original Message -
From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 11:55 AM
Subject: RE:
for Declude And
Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration,
MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.
Dan Geiser writes:
Hi, Again,
I was able to find the ALLOWVULNERABILITIESFROM in the Declude Release
Notes, http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=122. It looks like
questions or comments on the list
get formal response by Declude nowadays, so email to their support address
is the only way to get a response. There's just not the same level of
service or customer attention.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Dan Geiser [EMAIL PROTECTED
like to monitor things closely myself. Perhaps evidence of any issues
will show up in the log file?
---
Thanks, Much!
Dan
- Original Message -
From: Dan Geiser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 4:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring
Space Gap' Vulnerability.
Is there anyway that I can turn off checking for the Outlook 'Boundary
Space Gap' Vulnerability on either a specific incoming e-mail address or a
specific incoming e-mail domain?
Thanks In Advance,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED
to upgrade
to 2.0 at least. Is 2.0.6 a safe version to upgrade to in light of the
issues people have added with bugs and the like? If so, is there a special
place where I can go to get instructions on doing a Manual Upgrade to 2.0.6?
Thanks In Advance,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED
.
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Geiser
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 3:13 PM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.Virus] BANCRVIRUSES OFF for 1 Domain
Hello, All,
An e-mail hosting customer
incoming and outgoing e-mail?
Thanks,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Sign up for virus-free and spam-free e-mail with Nexus Technology Group
http://www.nexustechgroup.com/mailscan
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses
was generated by Declude.
Thanks In Advance,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Sign up for virus-free and spam-free e-mail with Nexus Technology Group
http://www.nexustechgroup.com/mailscan
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses
When messages with Encrypted Zip Attachments are caught where do the
messages end up? Is it in the SPAM directory, the VIRUS directory or
somewhere else?
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 9:10 AM
Subject: Re:
In Advance,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
n Symantec
or the usual virus discussion arenas.
Thanks In Advance,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I feel that Blars is free to put whomever he wants
on his blacklist. He basically says that he uses the list to block spam
being sent to him. He makes the blacklist publically available for others
that want to use it. No one is forced to usehis
blacklist.
As far as getting removed from the
one customer who doesn't want to receive the "Vulnerability"
warnings any longer.
Thanks In Advance,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
thought that
the MCUPDATE.EXE program is what would do that but it doesn't appear to have
that functionality.
Does anyone know if there's a command line virus definition updater that I
can use in the above scenario?
Thanks In Advance,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From
I'm confused. Why is it a worse situation?
- Original Message -
From: Mitch Hegstad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 1:01 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Deactivation
I can't argue with that. I just wish I wasn't left in a worse situation
than
,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 6:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Sort of OT: Blank Folding Vulnerability in
Backup Exec 9.1 Notifications
We have a customer who is running
on. I believe that space is being added
by Backup Exec. Would that cause the message to be undeliverable?
I think this client just upgraded from Backup Exec
9.0 to Backup Exec 9.1 and I'm thinking that maybe Veritas has unintentionally
introduced the Blank Folding Vulnerability from one version t
Scott,
Am I correct that if we don't have a current service agreement then we can't
upgrade to any version above 1.75?
Thanks,
Dan
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 10:39 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus]
Scott,
The current version number that we are running is 1.75. Our service
agreement expired on 12/31/03. What is the highest version number we can
upgrade to?
Thanks, Much!
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Can anyone share the McAfee definition files for this? Our's is currently
at 4286 and I can't get in manually or automatically to download the current
definition files.
Thanks,
Dan
- Original Message -
From: Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19,
Forget it. I finally got through to McAfee's web site.
Sorry for bothering y'all!!!
- Original Message -
From: Dan Geiser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Sobig.F
Can anyone share the McAfee definition files
of recip.eml?
Is that correct?
Thanks In Advance,
Dan Geiser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think we're thinking about two different things here: Blocking all
notifications versus blocking the vulnerability notifications. I'm
suggesting the later.
That's just it. The customer doesn't want to receive
) will allow you to prevent the
notifications from getting sent out for specific users or domains.
Given that they don't want any notifications, is my only option to use
SKIPIFRECIP then?
Thanks for your feedback!
Take Care,
Dan Geiser [EMAIL PROTECTED
if there is a way that I can
isolate their domain name and stop Declude Virus from sending these
WARNING: YOU WERE SENT A VIRUS messages to just the one domain.
Thanks In Advance For Any and All Feedback
Take Care,
Dan Geiser [EMAIL PROTECTED
notifications.
If that doesn't work, you can use SKIPIFRECIP to pervent the E-mail
notification from getting sent out for specific recipient(s), but that
probably won't be necessary with the SKIPIFVIRUSNAMEHAS Vulnerability
option.
And this would allow me to isolate specific recipients?
Thanks,
Dan
as it is a vulnerability which
could indicate a virus? Is it common practice to block for these or is this
something that can be safely passed through? Is there any way to fix this
from the sender's side? Any tips on how to persuade the sender to actually
fix the issue?
Thanks In Advance,
Dan Geiser
on the server?
All comments are appreciated.
Thanks In Advance,
Dan Geiser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This E-mail is scanned and free from viruses. www.nexustechgroup.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http
30 matches
Mail list logo
