RE: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG

2008-07-07 Thread David Barker
On the devlist but not to be expected soon David B From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 7:43 PM To: declude.virus@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG Any update or information on this? John T

Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG

2008-07-04 Thread John T
Any update or information on this?John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent 6/23/2008 11:36:40 AM To: declude.virus@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o\:* {behavior:url(#default

Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG

2008-06-24 Thread Bonno Bloksma
040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Colbeck, Andrew To: declude.virus@declude.com Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 6:56 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG For what it's worth, I never move messages from

Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG

2008-06-23 Thread Bonno Bloksma
- Original Message - From: Kevin Bilbee To: declude.virus@declude.com Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 5:25 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG Be careful with this setting. If a message gets held as spam it will not be virus scanned. Make sure you scan any

RE: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG

2008-06-23 Thread David Barker
Of Bonno Bloksma Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 4:20 AM To: declude.virus@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG Hi, (Open mail request) Dear Declude people. I have asked this before and with the current spam levels kan we PLEASE have this feature now ASAP? We all

Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG

2008-06-23 Thread Bonno Bloksma
@declude.com Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 4:28 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG Dear Bonno, It is not that we can't do this. We have chosen not to do this otherwise your users will end up with viruses in their junkmail folders. AVAFTERJM will skip messages

RE: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG

2008-06-23 Thread David Barker
: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG Hi David, Could you explain this: We have chosen not to do this otherwise your users will end up with viruses in their junkmail folders By NOT scanning held junkmail the virus WILL end up in a users mailbox if I have to reque the mail

RE: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG

2008-06-23 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
for viruses saves me a lot of processing power. Andrew. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 9:00 AM To: declude.virus@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG Correct

RE: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG

2008-06-23 Thread Kevin Bilbee
to VIRUSSCANONHOLD. This would make everyone happy. Kevin Bilbee From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 9:57 AM To: declude.virus@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG For what it's worth, I

RE: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG

2008-06-23 Thread David Barker
an option to VIRUSSCANONHOLD. This would make everyone happy. Kevin Bilbee From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 9:57 AM To: declude.virus@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG For what

Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG

2008-06-23 Thread Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
@declude.com *Sent:* Friday, June 13, 2008 5:25 PM *Subject:* RE: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG Be careful with this setting. If a message gets held as spam it will not be virus scanned. Make sure you scan any message moved back into the delivery queue for viruses

Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG

2008-06-16 Thread Brian Lin
@declude.com Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2008 11:05 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG Ahh... so the solution is to use Declude Junkmail instead of IMail's poor anti-spam. Then you could use the AVAFTERJM to work effectively with AV scanning. Darin. - Original Message

Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG

2008-06-14 Thread Brian Lin
I have bought declude anti-virus, not declude anti-spam. - Original Message - From: Darin Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.virus@declude.com Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2008 12:55 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG The reason for it not working

Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG

2008-06-14 Thread Darin Cox
AM Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG I have bought declude anti-virus, not declude anti-spam. - Original Message - From: Darin Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.virus@declude.com Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2008 12:55 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV

Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG

2008-06-13 Thread Brian Lin
I just terminate my F-Prot 6, and installed ClamAV SOSDG Before that, my CPU usage is always run to skyhigh, at around 70%-100%, now using ClamAV, reduce to 5%-20%, still catching all the testing virus. F-prot 6 do not provide option like noboot, nomem, I guess these become the default

Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG

2008-06-13 Thread Darin Cox
Interesting that you are also seeing the 70-100% CPU with F-Prot 6, where we are not. Are you running AVAFTERJM? Darin. - Original Message - From: Brian Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.virus@declude.com Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 5:23 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs

Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG

2008-06-13 Thread Brian Lin
No, I am still using antique version declude and imail. - Original Message - From: Darin Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.virus@declude.com Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 8:07 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG Interesting that you are also seeing the 70-100% CPU

Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG

2008-06-13 Thread Darin Cox
: Brian Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.virus@declude.com Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 8:55 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG No, I am still using antique version declude and imail. - Original Message - From: Darin Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.virus

RE: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG

2008-06-13 Thread Kevin Bilbee
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 6:10 AM To: declude.virus@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG AVAFTERJM has been around a long time. I don't remember what version, but it was a 1.x version. Are you familiar with the setting

Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG

2008-06-13 Thread Matt
Of Darin Cox Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 6:10 AM To: declude.virus@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG AVAFTERJM has been around a long time. I don't remember what version, but it was a 1.x version. Are you familiar with the setting? It tells Declude to run Anti

Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG

2008-06-13 Thread Darin Cox
@declude.com Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 9:10 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG AVAFTERJM has been around a long time. I don't remember what version, but it was a 1.x version. Are you familiar with the setting? It tells Declude to run Anti-Virus after Junkmail