[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1279?page=comments#action_12416715 ]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-1279:
---
As far as I can see, getColums() doesn't return any column named SCOPE_CATLOG
or SCOPE_CATALOG (but it should return
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1156?page=all ]
Suresh Thalamati updated DERBY-1156:
Attachment: reencrypt_3.diff
DERBY -1156 (partial)
This patch adds some code required to support reconfigure(rencryption) of
an already existing
[Auto-generated mail]
*Derby* 415160/2006-06-18 19:46:38 CEST
*derbyall*
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform
---
*Jvm: 1.6*
15715700 0 106.20% SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
Details in
sysinfo does not write Java SE and JDBC version when running under JDK 1.6
--
Key: DERBY-1427
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1427
Project: Derby
Type: Bug
Components: Tools
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1341?page=all ]
Anurag Shekhar updated DERBY-1341:
--
Attachment: derby-1341.diff
This diff is only for review of aprocah I am taking to resolve this issue.
I have introduced 3 new class in this patch.
Generating derby properties on the fly can lead to non-deterministic engine
startup behavior
Key: DERBY-1428
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1428
Project: Derby
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1384?page=all ]
Bernt M. Johnsen resolved DERBY-1384:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 415328.
Increase default BLOB/CLOB length to maximum supported (2G?)
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1384?page=comments#action_12416763 ]
Bernt M. Johnsen commented on DERBY-1384:
-
Docs Committed revision 415329.
Increase default BLOB/CLOB length to maximum supported (2G?)
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1374?page=comments#action_12416770 ]
Andreas Korneliussen commented on DERBY-1374:
-
I will run tests on the patch and commit it.
compatibility test fails with 'PROTOCOL Data Stream Syntax Error'
Additional vulnerability to non-deterministic startup behavior when
applications generate derby properties on the fly
-
Key: DERBY-1429
URL:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1428?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-1428:
-
Description:
A Heisenbug can arise if more than one embedded Derby application runs in the
same VM and at least one of them generates derby properties on
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-930?page=comments#action_12416775 ]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-930:
-
Adding a release note for this issue:
PROBLEM
If an embedded Derby application generates its own Derby properties on the fly,
and
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1429?page=comments#action_12416778 ]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-1429:
--
We could separate out the booting of the engine from the registration of the
embedded driver. This would eliminate this bug in
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-930?page=comments#action_12416781 ]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-930:
-
Here is a second rev of the release note. This attempts to clarify the extra
exposure introduced by jdk1.6.
PROBLEM
If an embedded
Hi Bryan,
Thanks for the quick response. I have revised the release note.
Hopefully, it now describes the VM-specific issues better.
Regards,
-Rick
Bryan Pendleton wrote:
Rick Hillegas (JIRA) wrote:
Adding a release note for this issue:
Hi Rick, thanks for writing the release note.
Kathey Marsden wrote:
David Van Couvering wrote:
- Log a bug
- Work on fixing it by booting on first connection rather than when
the driver is loaded.
It would be good to get input from the user community as well. One
possible approach would be to log the bug, mark it as a regression,
Hi Brent,
Sounds like you're off to a good start. From the initial bug report, it
looks like there's a good idea about which heuristic is being
mis-applied here. Once you've studied the optimizer papers, I recommend
that you post some high-level candidate solutions. Try to avoid
optimizer
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1241?page=all ]
Suresh Thalamati reassigned DERBY-1241:
---
Assign To: Suresh Thalamati
logmirror.ctrl is getting accessed outside the privileged block when the
checkpoint instant is invalid on log
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Rick Hillegas wrote:
Kathey Marsden wrote:
David Van Couvering wrote:
- Log a bug
- Work on fixing it by booting on first connection rather than when
the driver is loaded.
It would be good to get input from the user community as well. One
Kathey Marsden wrote:
Rick Hillegas wrote:
I'm afraid I don't understand why we would want to revert our tests
to the old behavior. It seems to me that our tests are practicing
stunts which we strongly discourage: changing Derby properties on the
fly. In general, there will always be
I am working on reducing the number of tests failing when running with
JDK 1.6. Some of the tests are now failing due to jdk16 specific
master files that have not been updated after introduction of textual
changes. To solve some of these failing tests I try eliminate the need
for jdk16 specific
Rick Hillegas wrote:
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Rick Hillegas wrote:
...
Does the precedence for properties documentation need to be updated to
mention jdbc 4/jdk 1.6 behavior?
http://db.apache.org/derby/docs/dev/tuning/ctunsetprop23308.html
I don't see that the precedence of properties has
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-578?page=comments#action_12416803 ]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-578:
-
Thanks, Manish. As you said, the fix looks pretty simple. I'm running
regression tests now. I have a couple questions:
1) I don't
Hi Olav,
Thanks for digging into this. The differences in the embedded output are
caused by JDBC4's introduction of SQLException subclasses. These now
replace Derby's hand-rolled subclass of SQLException. The old Derby
subclass overrode the getMessage() method. That's why you used to see
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1428?page=comments#action_12416810 ]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-1428:
--
Kathey adds the following:
I think DERBY-1428 and DERBY-149 are not really related to generating
derby.properties on the fly
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Rick Hillegas wrote:
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Rick Hillegas wrote:
...
Does the precedence for properties documentation need to be updated to
mention jdbc 4/jdk 1.6 behavior?
http://db.apache.org/derby/docs/dev/tuning/ctunsetprop23308.html
I don't see that the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1338?page=comments#action_12416817 ]
Dag H. Wanvik commented on DERBY-1338:
--
From: Bryan Pendleton, Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 16:17:59 -0700
The shutdown of the server *has* interrupted the thread, in
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1338?page=all ]
Dag H. Wanvik updated DERBY-1338:
-
Attachment: derby-1338.stat
derby-1338.diff
Here is a simple patch which preloads the class causing the problem.
It makes the tests run
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1108?page=comments#action_12416823 ]
A B commented on DERBY-1108:
I'm not very well acquainted with this code, but based on the example of
escape analysis posted by the JVM team, I think I understand why this test
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1108?page=comments#action_12416825 ]
Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-1108:
---
Thanks Army for the comment. I think I understand escape analysis better now
and how it relatest to this issue and I think
1)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1338?page=all ]
Dag H. Wanvik updated DERBY-1338:
-
Derby Info: [Patch Available]
Client tests DerbyNetNewServer and NSinSameVM fail with NoClassDefFoundError:
DRDAProtocolExceptionInfo when run from
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1338?page=all ]
Dag H. Wanvik updated DERBY-1338:
-
Component: Network Server
(was: Regression Test Failure)
Environment:
Sun JDK 1.4.2, Sun JDK 1.5 on Solaris
was:
Sun JDK
Rick Hillegas wrote:
This topic was raised in an earlier email thread
(http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.db.derby.devel/20899) but
it does not appear that we agreed on a solution. I would like to re-open
this topic and hopefully we can converge on how we want to handle this
issue.
Hiya Rick,
Thanks for you helpful reply! I spent some time over the weekend
snooping around (mostly) InListOperatorNode and OptimizerImpl, but
never found out _where_ the table scan was chosen over an index scan
for finding the IN matches...I really wanted to find it before begging
for
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1338?page=comments#action_12416840 ]
Bryan Pendleton commented on DERBY-1338:
Hi Dag,
I looked at your patch. Unless anybody else has a better suggestion, I think we
should go ahead and use your patch,
35 matches
Mail list logo