[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Auto-generated mail]
*TinderBox_Derby* 433085/2006-08-21 01:22:24 CEST
*derbyall*
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform
---
*Jvm: 1.5*
2672670 2 154.08% SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
Additonal Grant and Revoke tests
Key: DERBY-1736
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1736
Project: Derby
Issue Type: Test
Components: Test
Affects Versions: 10.2.1.0
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1736?page=all ]
Yip Ng reassigned DERBY-1736:
-
Assignee: Yip Ng
Additonal Grant and Revoke tests
Key: DERBY-1736
URL:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1708?page=comments#action_12429358 ]
Yip Ng commented on DERBY-1708:
---
derbyall passes, no new regression introduced with this patch.
Unprivileged user can perform lock table statement on a table which
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-418?page=comments#action_12429361 ]
Andreas Korneliussen commented on DERBY-418:
I think that the lack of synchronization when calling
singleUseActivation.markUnused() may cause that
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1712?page=all ]
Andreas Korneliussen resolved DERBY-1712.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Add a JUnit test decorator that starts the NetworkServer at setUp and stops
it at tearDown.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1712?page=all ]
Andreas Korneliussen closed DERBY-1712.
---
Add a JUnit test decorator that starts the NetworkServer at setUp and stops
it at tearDown.
[Auto-generated mail]
*Derby* 432992/2006-08-20 19:46:04 CEST
*derbyall*
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform
---
*Jvm: 1.6*
3715712 0 110.71% SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
Details in
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1558?page=all ]
Andreas Korneliussen updated DERBY-1558:
Attachment: DERBY-1558.diff
DERBY-1558.stat
Attaching patch which enables more testcases in ConcurrencyTest.
The patch makes
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1610?page=comments#action_12429368 ]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-1610:
---
There will be user impact even if only a few of the incompatible combinations
are changed to throw
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1610?page=comments#action_12429374 ]
Tomohito Nakayama commented on DERBY-1610:
--
I see
I think opinion of Knut is proper.
I will rollback DERBY-1535.
Then, this task is regarded as
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1693?page=comments#action_12429382 ]
Kristian Waagan commented on DERBY-1693:
I agree that the values for LOBs should not be printed.
The question is what should be printed instead?
I would go
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1547?page=comments#action_12429383 ]
V.Narayanan commented on DERBY-1547:
The four kinds of pattern strings that need to be searched for in the tests
output while solving this are the following
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1559?page=comments#action_12429384 ]
Tomohito Nakayama commented on DERBY-1559:
--
Hello, Andreas.
Discussion in DERBY-1610 resulted to the answer that we need to solve
DERBY-1610
before
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-418?page=comments#action_12429386 ]
Andreas Korneliussen commented on DERBY-418:
The finalizer thread is as pr javadoc guaranteed to not hold any user-visible
synchronization locks when
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1610?page=comments#action_12429387 ]
Tomohito Nakayama commented on DERBY-1610:
--
I think we need to fix the range of modification.
My plan is making compatibility around setBlob(notNull/null)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1633?page=all ]
A B updated DERBY-1633:
---
Attachment: d1633_v3_code.patch
d1633_v3_tests.patch
DERBY-1633_v3.html
Attaching a third attempt at resolving this issue, d1633_v3_code.patch
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1610?page=comments#action_12429390 ]
Tomohito Nakayama commented on DERBY-1610:
--
I meant setBinaryStream(notNull/null) also ...
Updating column typed as CHAR to value passed via
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1559?page=comments#action_12429394 ]
Andreas Korneliussen commented on DERBY-1559:
-
DERBY-1535 caused conflicts with this patch during development. Now, DERBY-1610
will cause conflicts
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1387?page=all ]
Sanket Sharma updated DERBY-1387:
-
Attachment: derbyjmx.patch
Submitting The Code for Derby's JMX Functionality as part of my Google SOC
project.
The patch addresses the following:
1)
Hi,
As part of my Google SOC project, I've uploaded the JMX code for review in Jira.
Please note the following:
The patch addresses the following:
1) Start derby with monitoring extensions enabled. To start derby with
monitoring extensions, you need to set derby.jmx environment variable
while
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1559?page=comments#action_12429403 ]
Tomohito Nakayama commented on DERBY-1559:
--
Well.
If *you* don't think the difference of DerbyNetClient/parameterMapping.out is
critically harmful,
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1559?page=comments#action_12429406 ]
Andreas Korneliussen commented on DERBY-1559:
-
I will wait for DERBY-1610 being fixed, to avoid the risk.
when receiving a single EXTDTA object
Hello.
Thank you for your carefulness.
Please give your watch on DERBY-1610 and decide when you commit DERBY-1559.
Best regards.
Andreas Korneliussen (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1559?page=comments#action_12429406 ]
Andreas Korneliussen commented
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1535?page=comments#action_12429415 ]
Tomohito Nakayama commented on DERBY-1535:
--
Now, I'm preparing to rollback DERBY-1513_1535_2.patch.
Please see more information in DERBY-1610.
Trial 2
Great -- thank you very much.
Kim
Knut Anders Hatlen (JIRA) wrote On 08/18/06 19:14,:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1717?page=all ]
Knut Anders Hatlen resolved DERBY-1717.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Derby Info: (was: [Patch
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1610?page=comments#action_12429416 ]
Tomohito Nakayama commented on DERBY-1610:
--
By the way, is it really possible to judge the type checks on the client side ?
There are only less
Gokul Soundararajan wrote:
I have placed the code and report on my website at:
Report
http://www.eecg.toronto.edu/~gokul/derby/derby-report-aug-19-2006.pdf
Code
http://www.eecg.toronto.edu/~gokul/derby/code/aug-19-2006/
Gokul,
Thank you very much for your work so far. It would be nice if
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1610?page=comments#action_12429424 ]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-1610:
---
Yes, I think you can decide the correct type on the client side.
ParameterMetaData (which can be obtained
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1610?page=comments#action_12429425 ]
Tomohito Nakayama commented on DERBY-1610:
--
Regarding check on the client side, I found description of PRPSQLSTT in the
spec of drda.
It seems that
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1610?page=comments#action_12429427 ]
Tomohito Nakayama commented on DERBY-1610:
--
Oh...
Our comments were conflicted :)
I see.
Anyway it seems that I need to work on current implementation of
Oystein Grovlen - Sun Norway wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Auto-generated mail]
*TinderBox_Derby* 433085/2006-08-21 01:22:24 CEST
*derbyall*
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform
---
*Jvm: 1.5*
2672670
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-418?page=comments#action_12429430 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-418:
-
I don't think there is any guarantee about the order of finalization, therefore
it is impossible to
Hello Knut.
By the way, I want to figure it out what is the actual range of
modification in DERBY-1610.
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-1610:
Therefore, I think that it is better to fix all of them at once.
What is all of them here ?
Just setBlob and setBinaryStream ?
Or whole case
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1535?page=all ]
Tomohito Nakayama updated DERBY-1535:
-
Attachment: DERBY-1513_1535_rollback.patch
Description of the patch :
Rollback DERBY-1513_1535_2.patch.
Test of the patch :
Execute derbyall
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1387?page=comments#action_12429432 ]
Andreas Korneliussen commented on DERBY-1387:
-
Hi, thanks for providing this patch. I have tried compiling it, and I do have
the following comments:
Tomohito Nakayama commented on DERBY-1610:
--
Oh...
Our comments were conflicted :)
I see.
Anyway it seems that I need to work on current implementation of
NetworkClient.
I will try.
Great! One extra benefit we get when we have the type check on
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1633?page=all ]
A B updated DERBY-1633:
---
Derby Info: [Patch Available, Existing Application Impact, Regression]
(was: [Existing Application Impact, Regression])
Regression: The fields of views are not being
On 8/21/06, Andreas Korneliussen (JIRA) derby-dev@db.apache.org wrote:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1387?page=comments#action_12429432 ]
Andreas Korneliussen commented on DERBY-1387:
-
Hi, thanks for providing this patch. I have
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
On 8/20/06, Satheesh Bandaram (JIRA) derby-dev@db.apache.org wrote:
3) Looks like the code uses generics, which limit the use to JDK 1.5
platforms. While this may be ok, need to document need for JDK 1.5
platform and raise appropriate message if used in earlier
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1730?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-1730:
-
Urgency: Urgent (was: Normal)
Manifest file doesn't contain OSGi attributes
-
Key:
Issue Subscription
Filter: Derby: JIRA issues with patch available (22 issues)
Subscriber: derby-dev
Key Summary
DERBY-1633 Regression: The fields of views are not being calculated properly
since 10.1.2.4
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1633
DERBY-1559 when
Network Server should check for current open and active connections before
shutting down a database
---
Key: DERBY-1737
URL:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-418?page=comments#action_12429438 ]
Andreas Korneliussen commented on DERBY-418:
I am not sure what you mean.
Could you give an example ?
I agree that it is possible to get a deadlock
This is a continuation of a discussion on the users mailing list which I
was advised to transfer here. See:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.db.derby.user/4836/focus=4836
I've applied the patch for dropping columns and confirmed it works in a
basic scenario. Here are some follow
Hi Dan,
Thanks for pointing this out. I will bump the last digit now.
Regards,
-Rick
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
Since there was a snapshot off the 10.2 branch, shouldn't its current
version be 10.2.1.1 beta? I thought after a snapshot the normal practice
was to bump the last digit. Maybe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sanket Sharma wrote:
On 8/21/06, Andreas Korneliussen (JIRA) derby-dev@db.apache.org wrote:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1387?page=comments#action_12429432
]
Andreas Korneliussen commented on DERBY-1387:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1678?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-1678:
-
Attachment: derby-1678-10.2-bumpVersionNumbers_v03.diff
Committing derby-1678-10.2-bumpVersionNumbers_v03.diff, bumping the last digit
of the version id
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Rick Hillegas wrote:
...
Also noticed that on the download page in the left panel, derby
10.1.2.1 is listed instead of 10.1.3.1.
Good catch -- and where to correct that isn't obvious. Here is the file:
derby/site/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/site.xml
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1622?page=all ]
Laura Stewart reopened DERBY-1622:
--
Need to add one more fix
Add documentation for encrypted database using encryptionKey
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-418?page=comments#action_12429442 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-418:
-
The alternate way to phrase it is:
Can you guarantee no deadlocks from using synchronization in the
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1622?page=all ]
Laura Stewart updated DERBY-1622:
-
Attachment: derby1622_html5.zip
derby1622_devguide_5.diff
Updated file tdevdvlp40140 per comments received.
I thought that file
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1622?page=all ]
Laura Stewart updated DERBY-1622:
-
Derby Info: [Patch Available]
Add documentation for encrypted database using encryptionKey
Laura Stewart (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1622?page=all ]
Laura Stewart updated DERBY-1622:
-
Attachment: derby1622_html5.zip
derby1622_devguide_5.diff
Updated file tdevdvlp40140 per comments
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1622?page=comments#action_12429448 ]
Sunitha Kambhampati commented on DERBY-1622:
Thanks Laura for the updates. Changes in derby1622_html5.zip look good and can
be committed.
Add
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1717?page=comments#action_12429449 ]
Stan Bradbury commented on DERBY-1717:
--
Better late than never: I reviewed the revised section and the rework looks
great. Thanks Kim for your attention in
1. Dropping the column seems very slow for large tables.
This is good to know. I don't think anybody has really experimented with
this yet. Can you quantify very slow with some real measurements
you've taken? Do you think it would be reasonable to treat this as
a follow-on improvement to the
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1622?page=all ]
Jean T. Anderson resolved DERBY-1622.
-
Fix Version/s: 10.3.0.0
(was: 10.2.1.0)
Resolution: Fixed
Derby Info: (was: [Patch Available])
Committed patch
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1655?page=comments#action_12429467 ]
A B commented on DERBY-1655:
Thank you Laura for taking the time to port the doc changes in _v1.html into
the Derby 10.2 manuals.
The changes in:
A B (JIRA) wrote:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1655?page=comments#action_12429467
]
A B commented on DERBY-1655:
Thank you Laura for taking the time to port the doc changes in _v1.html into
the Derby 10.2 manuals.
The
An user is able to grant select privilege on a view but the underlying object
is not own by the user.
--
Key: DERBY-1738
URL:
On 8/21/06, Daniel John Debrunner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
On 8/20/06, Satheesh Bandaram (JIRA) derby-dev@db.apache.org wrote:
3) Looks like the code uses generics, which limit the use to JDK 1.5
platforms. While this may be ok, need to document need for JDK 1.5
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-418?page=comments#action_12429473 ]
Andreas Korneliussen commented on DERBY-418:
Assuming the Derby embedded JDBC driver is thread-safe, it should be safe for a
result set to call its own
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1655?page=comments#action_12429474 ]
Jean T. Anderson commented on DERBY-1655:
-
Committed to the trunk derby1655_tuning.diff (revision 433298) and
derby1655_tools_html.diff (revision 433307).
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
On 8/21/06, Daniel John Debrunner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
On 8/20/06, Satheesh Bandaram (JIRA) derby-dev@db.apache.org wrote:
3) Looks like the code uses generics, which limit the use to JDK 1.5
platforms. While this may be ok, need to
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1655?page=comments#action_12429477 ]
Laura Stewart commented on DERBY-1655:
--
Hi Army -
I am working on updating the dev guide now and will include these comments for
the ref manual.
I should
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1547?page=comments#action_12429478 ]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1547:
The above solution has been based on the suggestions received for this issue
in using a property file as the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-418?page=comments#action_12429483 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-418:
-
I'd assumed that you were going to go in at a lower level than
ResultSet.close(). ResultSet.close() is
Hi -
Should there be a semi-colon at the end of the SQL statement examples
in the Derby documentation. In other documentation work that I have
done, this was the standard. I just wanted to check with the Derby
community to see what is appropriate for the Derby docs.
--
Laura Stewart
On 8/21/06, Daniel John Debrunner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is actually engine code, so should not be used by the tools (or the
tests)
Yet there are references to JVMInfo in both ij and sysinfo. Should
these be removed, then?
it would work for some cases (assuming the code was moved),
[Auto-generated mail]
*TinderBox_Derby* 433261/2006-08-21 17:22:24 CEST
*derbyall*
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform
---
*Jvm: 1.5*
1672671 2 149.26% SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
Details in
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1655?page=comments#action_12429486 ]
Laura Stewart commented on DERBY-1655:
--
Regarding the new information about XMLEXISTS, you ask that it be put into the
Built-in function section and yet you
Andreas Korneliussen (JIRA) derby-dev@db.apache.org writes:
Assuming the Derby embedded JDBC driver is thread-safe, it should be
safe for a result set to call its own close() method in its
finalizer. If you get a dead-lock in the finalizer, it proves that
it is also possible to write a
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
On 8/21/06, Daniel John Debrunner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is actually engine code, so should not be used by the tools (or the
tests)
Yet there are references to JVMInfo in both ij and sysinfo. Should
these be removed, then?
Or the code moved into the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1292?page=comments#action_12429487 ]
James F. Adams commented on DERBY-1292:
---
The uploaded patch is ready for review.
ClassCastException in ClientDriver when using CLOB columns and batch
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1738?page=comments#action_12429488 ]
Satheesh Bandaram commented on DERBY-1738:
--
This is a duplicate of the issue Rajesh has already filed. I think that is
DERBY-1686.
An user is able to
Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
Andreas Korneliussen (JIRA) derby-dev@db.apache.org writes:
Assuming the Derby embedded JDBC driver is thread-safe, it should be
safe for a result set to call its own close() method in its
finalizer. If you get a dead-lock in the finalizer, it proves that
it is
Not sure of the guarantee of the unsynchronized field being set. Are you
saying that field will never be seen as set, or that the setting may not be
seen for some time?
It may be seen, however it may also never be seen.
Andreas
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1655?page=comments#action_12429495 ]
A B commented on DERBY-1655:
Okay to refer to it as a function instead of an operator?
Great question. I guess I'm not sure what the answer here should be...
I've
TomohitoNakayama [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello Knut.
By the way, I want to figure it out what is the actual range of
modification in DERBY-1610.
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-1610:
Therefore, I think that it is better to fix all of them at once.
What is all of them here ?
Just
Laura Stewart wrote:
Hi -
Should there be a semi-colon at the end of the SQL statement examples
in the Derby documentation. In other documentation work that I have
done, this was the standard. I just wanted to check with the Derby
community to see what is appropriate for the Derby docs.
I
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1674?page=comments#action_12429501 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1674:
--
Simple stats on class count and sizes in insane mode (from the classes folder,
not size in the jar).
Laura Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi -
Should there be a semi-colon at the end of the SQL statement examples
in the Derby documentation. In other documentation work that I have
done, this was the standard. I just wanted to check with the Derby
community to see what is appropriate for
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1582?page=all ]
Deepa Remesh updated DERBY-1582:
Derby Info: [Patch Available]
REVOKE statement does not generate a warning when no privileges are revoked.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1582?page=all ]
Deepa Remesh updated DERBY-1582:
Attachment: d1582_v2_with_tests.diff
Attaching patch 'd1582_v2_with_tests.diff' which raises a warning when no
privileges are revoked by the revoke statement
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1738?page=all ]
Yip Ng closed DERBY-1738.
-
Resolution: Duplicate
Duplicate to DERBY-1686, link DERBY-1686 to DERBY-1330.
An user is able to grant select privilege on a view but the underlying object
is not own by
On 8/21/06, Bryan Pendleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3. The version from trunk does not appear able to read databases created
with the 10.1.3.1 release. Has the database file syntax changed?
I'm hoping one of the other developers can help with this question.
I think that this is on purpose,
Index column names in CatalogRowFactory implementations are not required
Key: DERBY-1739
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1739
Project: Derby
Issue
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1734?page=comments#action_12429518 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1734:
--
5) No requirement to convert the case for column names, these classes are for
Derby's implementation
I want to keep the community informed on where this issue stands right
now. The short story is that the lawyers are still working on some
solution which will allow us to build our JDBC4 drivers even though Java
SE 6 is still in beta. The lawyers know that we want to build a release
candidate
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1633?page=comments#action_12429520 ]
A B commented on DERBY-1633:
I applied the _v3 patches and ran derbyall on Red Hat Linux with ibm142 against
sane jars with no new failures. So as mentioned in my
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-688?page=all ]
A B updated DERBY-688:
--
Attachment: d688_phase6_v1.patch
Attaching a phase 6 patch, d688_phase6_v1.patch, that changes the SQLSTATEs for
XML errors to match the SQL/XML specification where possible, and
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-688?page=all ]
A B updated DERBY-688:
--
Derby Info: [Patch Available]
Enhancements to XML functionality to move toward XPath/XQuery support...
Change error message to indicate encryptionkey length to be atleast 16
characters instead of 8 characters
-
Key: DERBY-1740
URL:
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
On 5/10/06, Daniel John Debrunner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, I think when a snapshot is posted we should leave the older
snapshots on the download page. Makes it much easier for people to
demonstrate a regression if they can easily show it's in the latest
Deepa Remesh wrote:
On 8/21/06, Bryan Pendleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3. The version from trunk does not appear able to read databases
created
with the 10.1.3.1 release. Has the database file syntax changed?
I'm hoping one of the other developers can help with this question.
I
On 8/21/06, Sunitha Kambhampati [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are the snapshot jars stored in svn someplace ? Where can I get them
from. It would be great if you can point me to the link.
The jars are stored in svn with the website, in the site tree. You can
run svn log on build/site/binaries in
Hi Sunitha,
The 10.2.0.4 alpha snapshot is still visible from the downloads page.
You can get ahold of an older snapshot than that, although it's not
pretty. The snapshots hang off the Derby website and so are checked into
the Derby website repository. You need to create a subversion client
[Auto-generated mail]
*TinderBox_Derby* 433317/2006-08-21 20:32:59 CEST
*derbyall*
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform
---
*Jvm: 1.5*
1672671 2 155.29% SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
Details in
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
or use viewvc to get a download link without having to check out the
site tree.
That helps. Thanks Andrew and Rick.
Sunitha.
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo